Penfornis Alfred, Blicklé Jean Frédéric, Fiquet Béatrice, Quéré Stéphane, Dejager Sylvie
Department of Endocrinology-Metabolism and Diabetology-Nutrition, Jean Minjoz Hospital, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Department of Internal Medicine and Diabetology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Jun 13;10:341-52. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S60312. eCollection 2014.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequent in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and therapeutic management of diabetes is more challenging in patients with renal impairment (RI). The place of metformin is of particular interest since most scientific societies now recommend using half the dosage in moderate RI and abstaining from use in severe RI, while the classic contraindication with RI has not been removed from the label. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic management, in particular the use of metformin, of T2DM patients with CKD in real life.
This was a French cross-sectional observational study: 3,704 patients with T2DM diagnosed for over 1 year and pharmacologically treated were recruited in two cohorts (two-thirds were considered to have renal disease [CKD patients] and one-third were not [non-CKD patients]) by 968 physicians (81% general practitioners) in 2012.
CKD versus non-CKD patients were significantly older with longer diabetes history, more diabetic complications, and less strict glycemic control (mean glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] 7.5% versus 7.1%; 25% of CKD patients had HbA1c ≥8% versus 15% of non-CKD patients). Fifteen percent of CKD patients had severe RI, and 66% moderate RI. Therapeutic management of T2DM was clearly distinct in CKD, with less use of metformin (62% versus 86%) but at similar mean daily doses (~2 g/d). Of patients with severe RI, 33% were still treated with metformin, at similar doses. For other oral anti-diabetics, a distinct pattern of use was seen across renal function (RF): use of sulfonylureas (32%, 31%, and 20% in normal RF, moderate RI, and severe RI, respectively) and DPP4-i (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) (41%, 36%, and 25%, respectively) decreased with RF, while that of glinides increased (8%, 14%, and 18%, respectively). CKD patients were more frequently treated with insulin (40% versus 16% of non-CKD patients), and use of insulin increased with deterioration of RF (19%, 39%, and 61% of patients with normal RF, moderate RI, and severe RI, respectively). Treatment was modified at the end of the study-visit in 34% of CKD patients, primarily to stop or reduce metformin. However, metformin was stopped in only 40% of the severe RI patients.
Despite a fairly good detection of CKD in patients with T2DM, RI was insufficiently taken into account for adjusting anti-diabetic treatment.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中很常见,而糖尿病的治疗管理在肾功能损害(RI)患者中更具挑战性。二甲双胍的使用情况尤其受到关注,因为现在大多数科学协会建议在中度RI患者中使用一半剂量,在重度RI患者中避免使用,而RI的经典禁忌证仍未从药品标签中去除。本研究旨在评估现实生活中CKD的T2DM患者的治疗管理,特别是二甲双胍的使用情况。
这是一项法国横断面观察性研究:2012年,968名医生(81%为全科医生)招募了3704名诊断为T2DM超过1年且接受药物治疗的患者,分为两个队列(三分之二被认为患有肾脏疾病[CKD患者],三分之一没有[非CKD患者])。
与非CKD患者相比,CKD患者年龄显著更大,糖尿病病史更长,糖尿病并发症更多,血糖控制更不严格(平均糖化血红蛋白[HbA(1c)]分别为7.5%和7.1%;25%的CKD患者HbA1c≥8%,而非CKD患者为15%)。15%的CKD患者有重度RI,66%有中度RI。CKD患者的T2DM治疗管理明显不同,二甲双胍的使用较少(62%对86%),但平均日剂量相似(约2g/d)。在重度RI患者中,33%仍接受二甲双胍治疗,剂量相似。对于其他口服抗糖尿病药物,不同肾功能(RF)的使用模式不同:磺脲类药物(正常RF、中度RI和重度RI患者中分别为32%、31%和20%)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4-i)(分别为41%、36%和25%)的使用随RF降低,而格列奈类药物的使用增加(分别为8%、14%和18%)。CKD患者更常接受胰岛素治疗(40%对非CKD患者的16%),胰岛素的使用随RF恶化而增加(正常RF、中度RI和重度RI患者中分别为19%、39%和61%)。在研究访视结束时,34%的CKD患者的治疗方案发生了改变,主要是停用或减少二甲双胍。然而,只有40%的重度RI患者停用了二甲双胍。
尽管对T2DM患者的CKD检测情况相当不错,但在调整抗糖尿病治疗时,RI未得到充分考虑。