• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决定心房颤动复律成功与否的因素及能量需求

Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Dalzell G W, Anderson J, Adgey A A

机构信息

Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland.

出版信息

Q J Med. 1990 Sep;76(281):903-13.

PMID:2236476
Abstract

Factors thought to affect the success of and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation were studied in 80 (49 male, 31 female) patients aged 21-88 (mean 61.5 years). Transthoracic impedance was measured in advance of the countershock using a 30 kHz low amplitude AC current passed through self-adhesive ECG/defibrillator pads (diameters 8-12 cm) applied to the chest in the antero-posterior (AP) position in 57 patients and the anteroapical (AA) position in 23 patients. Mean transthoracic impedance for all patients was 69.3 +/- 16 (SD) ohms (range 39-131 ohms), but transthoracic impedance was significantly greater in the AA than the AP position (75.4 +/- 13 vs. 66.7 +/- 16 ohms, p = 0.02). Initial energy was 50 J (delivered) and was gradually increased to a maximum of 360 J if required. Cardioversion was successful in 73 of 80 (91.2 per cent), and low energy shocks (less than or equal to 200 J) were successful in 45 of 80 (56.2 per cent) patients. Using single factor analysis, sex, left atrial enlargement, electrode pad positions, aetiology of atrial fibrillation, presence of left ventricular failure, and prior treatment with verapamil or beta-adrenergic blockers were not significant determinants of cardioversion success or success of low energy shocks but prior treatment with digoxin was, both for cardioversion success and success at low energies. In patients with transthoracic impedance less than or equal to 70 ohms, low energy shocks were more often successful (33 or 50, 66 per cent) than in patients with transthoracic impedance greater than 70 ohms (12 of 30, 40 per cent), p = 0.04. Using univariate analysis, cardioversion success with low energy shocks was not only significantly associated with prior treatment with digoxin but also with the duration of atrial fibrillation (24 hours to one month and one month to three years) and for shocks of less than or equal to 100 J, with prior treatment with amiodarone. Multifactorial linear regression analysis selected, in rank order, only duration of atrial fibrillation of 24 hours to less than one month and one month to three years as significant predictors of both cardioversion success irrespective of shock strength, and success of low energy shocks.

摘要

在80例年龄21 - 88岁(平均61.5岁)的患者(49例男性,31例女性)中,对可能影响心房颤动复律成功率及能量需求的因素进行了研究。在电击复律前,通过将30kHz低振幅交流电流通过自粘性心电图/除颤器电极片(直径8 - 12cm)来测量经胸阻抗,其中57例患者电极片置于胸部前后位(AP),23例患者置于心尖前位(AA)。所有患者的平均经胸阻抗为69.3±16(标准差)欧姆(范围39 - 131欧姆),但AA位的经胸阻抗显著高于AP位(75.4±13对66.7±16欧姆,p = 0.02)。初始能量为50J(已输送),如有需要可逐渐增加至最大360J。80例患者中有73例(91.2%)复律成功,80例患者中有45例(56.2%)低能量电击(小于或等于200J)成功。采用单因素分析,性别、左心房扩大、电极片位置、心房颤动病因、左心室衰竭的存在以及维拉帕米或β - 肾上腺素能阻滞剂的既往治疗并非复律成功或低能量电击成功的显著决定因素,但地高辛的既往治疗对复律成功及低能量复律均有影响。在经胸阻抗小于或等于70欧姆的患者中,低能量电击成功的比例(33/50,66%)高于经胸阻抗大于70欧姆的患者(12/30,40%),p = 0.04。采用单变量分析,低能量电击复律成功不仅与地高辛的既往治疗显著相关,还与心房颤动的持续时间(24小时至1个月以及1个月至3年)相关,对于小于或等于100J的电击,还与胺碘酮的既往治疗相关。多因素线性回归分析按重要性顺序选择,仅心房颤动持续时间24小时至小于1个月以及1个月至3年是复律成功(无论电击强度如何)和低能量电击成功的显著预测因素。

相似文献

1
Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.决定心房颤动复律成功与否的因素及能量需求
Q J Med. 1990 Sep;76(281):903-13.
2
Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: revised version.心房颤动复律成功的决定因素及能量需求:修订版
Q J Med. 1991 Jan;78(285):85-95.
3
Impedance compensated biphasic waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a multi-centre comparison of antero-apical and antero-posterior pad positions.用于心房颤动经胸心脏复律的阻抗补偿双相波:前后位与前尖位电极片位置的多中心比较
Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1298-302. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi196. Epub 2005 Apr 11.
4
Efficacy of biphasic shock for transthoracic cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: can we predict energy requirements?双相波电击用于持续性心房颤动经胸心脏复律的疗效:我们能否预测能量需求?
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Jun;27(6 Pt 1):764-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00525.x.
5
[Double sequential electrical transthoracic shocks for refractory atrial fibrillation].[双序列经胸电休克治疗难治性心房颤动]
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2005 Jul-Sep;75 Suppl 3:S3-69-80.
6
Determinants of thoracic electrical impedance in external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 1;98(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.065. Epub 2006 May 5.
7
Low energy biphasic waveform cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias in pediatric patients and young adults.小儿患者和年轻成人房性心律失常的低能量双相波电复律
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Dec;29(12):1383-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00551.x.
8
Biphasic energy selection for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The BEST AF Trial.心房颤动经胸心脏复律的双相能量选择。BEST AF试验。
Heart. 2008 Jul;94(7):884-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.120782. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
9
Can short-term verapamil therapy reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful low energy intracardiac cardioversion?短期维拉帕米治疗能否降低低能量心内电复律成功后房颤的复发率?
Ital Heart J. 2001 Jul;2(7):513-8.
10
A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.一项比较单相和双相波形电击用于心房颤动体外复律的随机试验。
Am Heart J. 2004 May;147(5):e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.049.

引用本文的文献

1
External electrical and pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardias: a network meta-analysis.体外电复律和药物复律治疗心房颤动、心房扑动或房性心动过速的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 3;6(6):CD013255. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013255.pub2.
2
Investigating the efficacy of chest pressure for direct current cardioversion in atrial fibrillation: a randomised control trial protocol (Pressure-AF).研究胸外按压在心房颤动直流电复律中的疗效:一项随机对照试验方案(Pressure-AF)。
Open Heart. 2021 Sep;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001739.
3
Direct Current Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmias in Adults With Cardiac Amyloidosis.
成人心脏淀粉样变伴心律失常的直流电复律。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):589-597. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.079.
4
Improvement of the myocardial performance index in atrial fibrilation patients treated with amiodarone after cardioversion.胺碘酮治疗心房颤动患者复律后心肌性能指数的改善
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar;42(2):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9965-0. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Predictors of long-term maintenance of normal sinus rhythm after successful electrical cardioversion.成功电复律后正常窦性心律长期维持的预测因素。
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):381-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.22276. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
6
Current status of internal cardioversion in atrial fibrillation.心房颤动内部心脏复律的现状
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2002 Apr 1;2(2):40-4.
7
Atrial fibrillation: choosing an antiarrhythmic drug.心房颤动:选择一种抗心律失常药物。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2006 Sep;8(5):370-6. doi: 10.1007/s11886-006-0077-z.
8
Rate-control or rhythm-control: where do we stand?心率控制还是节律控制:我们目前的状况如何?
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2005 Oct 1;5(4):296-304.
9
The role of biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.双相电击在心房颤动经胸心脏复律中的作用。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2005 Oct 1;5(4):289-95.
10
Higher energy monophasic DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation: is it time to start at 360 joules?用于持续性心房颤动的高能量单相直流电复律:是时候从360焦耳开始了吗?
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003 Apr;8(2):121-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1542-474x.2003.08205.x.