Suppr超能文献

学习基础腹腔镜技能:一项比较箱式训练器、虚拟现实模拟器和心理训练的随机对照研究。

Learning basic laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled study comparing box trainer, virtual reality simulator, and mental training.

机构信息

King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were (1) to compare different methods of learning basic laparoscopic skills using box trainer (BT), virtual reality simulator (VRS) and mental training (MT); and (2) to determine the most effective method of learning laparoscopic skills.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

King's College, London.

METHODS

41 medical students were included in the study. After randomization, they were divided into 5 groups. Group 1 was the control group without training; group 2 was box trained; group 3 was also box trained with an additional practice session; group 4 was VRS trained; and group 5 was solely mentally trained. The task was to cut out a circle marked on a stretchable material. All groups were assessed after 1 week on both BT and VRS. Four main parameters were assessed, namely time, precision, accuracy, and performance.

RESULTS

Time: On BT assessment, the box-trained group with additional practice group 3 was the fastest, and the mental-trained group 5 was the slowest. On VRS assessment, the time difference between group 3 and the control group 1 was statistically significant. Precision: On BT assessment, the box-trained groups 2 and 3 scored high, and mental trained were low on precision. On VRS assessment, the VRS-trained group ranked at the top, and the MT group was at the bottom on precision. Accuracy: On BT assessment, the box-trained group 3 was best and the mental-trained group was last. On VRS assessment, the VRS-trained group 4 scored high closely followed by box-trained groups 2 and 3. Performance: On BT assessment, the box-trained group 3 ranked above all the other groups, and the mental-trained group ranked last. On VRS assessment, the VRS group 4 scored best, followed closely by box-trained groups 2 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The skills learned on box training were reproducible on both VRS and BT. However, not all the skills learned on VRS were transferable to BT. Furthermore, VRS was found to be a reliable and the most convenient method of assessment. MT alone cannot replace conventional training.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是(1)比较使用箱式训练器(BT)、虚拟现实模拟器(VRS)和心理训练(MT)学习基本腹腔镜技能的不同方法;(2)确定学习腹腔镜技能最有效的方法。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

伦敦国王学院。

方法

将 41 名医学生纳入研究。随机分组后,他们被分为 5 组。第 1 组为无训练对照组;第 2 组为箱式训练组;第 3 组为额外练习的箱式训练组;第 4 组为 VRS 训练组;第 5 组为单独的心理训练组。任务是在可拉伸材料上切割一个标记的圆圈。所有组在 BT 和 VRS 评估后 1 周均进行评估。评估了 4 个主要参数,即时间、精度、准确性和性能。

结果

时间:BT 评估时,额外练习箱式训练组 3 最快,心理训练组 5 最慢。VRS 评估时,组 3 与对照组 1 之间的时间差异具有统计学意义。精度:BT 评估时,箱式训练组 2 和 3 得分较高,而心理训练组得分较低。VRS 评估时,VRS 训练组排名最高,而 MT 组排名最低。准确性:BT 评估时,箱式训练组 3 最佳,心理训练组最后。VRS 评估时,VRS 训练组 4 得分最高,其次是箱式训练组 2 和 3。性能:BT 评估时,箱式训练组 3 排名高于其他所有组,而心理训练组排名最后。VRS 评估时,VRS 组 4 得分最高,其次是箱式训练组 2 和 3。

结论

箱式训练中习得的技能在 VRS 和 BT 上均可重复。然而,并非所有在 VRS 上习得的技能都可转移到 BT 上。此外,VRS 被发现是一种可靠且最方便的评估方法。单独的 MT 不能替代传统训练。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验