Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Dec;165(12):3565-3572. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05868-0. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
A cornerstone of surgical residency training is an educational program that produces highly skilled and effective surgeons. Training structures are constantly being revised due to evolving program structures, shifting workforces, and variability in the clinical environment. This has resulted in significant heterogeneity in all surgical resident education, training tools utilized, and measures of training efficacy.
We systematically reviewed educational interventions for technical skills in neurosurgery published across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science over four decades. We extracted general characteristics of each surgical training tool while categorizing educational interventions by modality and neurosurgical application.
We identified 626 studies which developed surgical training tools across eight different training modalities: textbooks and literature (11), online resources (53), didactic teaching and one-on-one instruction (7), laboratory courses (50), cadaveric models (63), animal models (47), mixed reality (166), and physical models (229). While publication volume has grown exponentially, a majority of studies were cited with relatively low frequency. Most training programs were published in the development and validation phase with only 2.1% of tools implemented long-term. Each training modality expressed unique strengths and limitations, with limited data reported on the educational impact connected to each training tool.
Numerous surgical training tools have been developed and implemented across residency training programs. Though many creative and cutting-edge tools have been devised, evidence supporting educational efficacy and long-term application is lacking. Increased utilization of novel surgical training tools will require validation of metrics used to assess the training outcomes and optimized integration with clinical practice.
外科住院医师培训的基石是一个能够培养出高技能、高效率外科医生的教育项目。由于项目结构不断演变、劳动力转移以及临床环境的变化,培训结构也在不断修订。这导致所有外科住院医师教育、所使用的培训工具以及培训效果的衡量标准都存在显著的异质性。
我们系统地回顾了过去四十年在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 上发表的神经外科技术技能教育干预措施的文献。我们在对教育干预措施进行分类时,提取了每种外科培训工具的一般特征,包括模式和神经外科应用。
我们确定了 626 项研究,这些研究开发了 8 种不同培训模式的外科培训工具:教科书和文献(11 项)、在线资源(53 项)、教学和一对一指导(7 项)、实验室课程(50 项)、尸体模型(63 项)、动物模型(47 项)、混合现实(166 项)和物理模型(229 项)。尽管出版物数量呈指数级增长,但大多数研究的引用频率相对较低。大多数培训计划都处于开发和验证阶段,只有 2.1%的工具得到了长期实施。每种培训模式都有其独特的优势和局限性,关于与每种培训工具相关的教育效果的报道有限。
许多外科培训工具已经在住院医师培训项目中得到了开发和实施。虽然已经设计出许多富有创意和前沿的工具,但缺乏对教育效果和长期应用的证据。要增加对新型外科培训工具的利用,需要对评估培训结果的指标进行验证,并优化与临床实践的整合。