Schwagmeier R, Schmidt A, Nolte H
Institut für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum Minden.
Reg Anaesth. 1990 Sep;13(7):148-52.
Unanimity has not yet been reached on the influence of injection speed and needle size on the spread of sensory blockade in spinal anesthesia. While McClure et al. [6] proved that a change in injection speed had no effect on the spread of the blockade, Lanz et al. [4] showed in their investigation that increasing injection speed increases the spread of the blockade. The influence of needle size has hardly been investigated so far. Moore et al. [7] report that the needle size alone has no effect on the spread of the blockade. In this study the influence of injection speed and that of needle size on spread of sensory blockade were considered separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Spinal puncture was performed via the midline approach at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in a sitting position. Immediately after the induction of anesthesia the patients were placed in the supine position again. As local anesthetic 15 mg (3 ml) bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine 1:200000 was administered. The aim of the study was to find out how far injection speed and size of the spinal needle influenced the sensory spread in isobaric spinal anesthesia. The height of sensory blockade was assessed by means of the pin-prick method in the midline, and the onset of analgesia was determined as height of spread. The injection speeds for the local anesthetic solution were 0.25, 0.5 and 1 ml per second. The needle sizes were 22, 25, and 29 gauge. Each group consisted of 15 patients. RESULTS. It turned out that slow (0.25 ml/s) and the fast (1 ml s) injection was associated with a significantly higher level of analgesia than the medium one (0.5 ml/s). Cephalad spread was to T7 in the first two groups, while the medium injection speed only achieved a level of T9. The results are statistically significant (P less than 0.05). The comparison of different needle sizes (22, 25, and 29 gauge) used for spinal anesthesia showed a higher spread of the sensory blockade with increased diameter of the spinal needle given a constant injection speed. With the 22-gauge needles (n = 15) sensory blockade extended on average to T7, with 25-gauge needles (n = 15) to T9, and with 29-gauge needles (n = 15) to T10. It has to be mentioned, however, that with the 29-gauge needle the standard injection speed of 0.5 ml/s could not be achieved because of the small inner diameter. The differences between 22- and 25-gauge needles are statistically significant (P less than 0.05). DISCUSSION. No direct relation could be proved between the different injection speeds and the spread of the blockade. Our results are hardly comparable with those of other investigators, since other groups have used different local anesthetics or performed investigations in vitro. The use of large spinal needles is associated with spread of the spinal block to a significantly higher level than is achieved with thinner needles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
关于注射速度和针的尺寸对脊髓麻醉中感觉阻滞范围的影响,目前尚未达成一致意见。虽然麦克卢尔等人[6]证明注射速度的改变对阻滞范围没有影响,但兰茨等人[4]在其研究中表明,增加注射速度会增加阻滞范围。到目前为止,针的尺寸的影响几乎未被研究。摩尔等人[7]报告说,仅针的尺寸对阻滞范围没有影响。在本研究中,分别考虑了注射速度和针的尺寸对感觉阻滞范围的影响。材料与方法。患者取坐位,通过L3 - 4椎间隙的中线入路进行脊髓穿刺。麻醉诱导后立即将患者再次置于仰卧位。给予15毫克(3毫升)含1:200000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因作为局部麻醉剂。本研究的目的是找出注射速度和脊髓针的尺寸在等比重脊髓麻醉中对感觉扩散的影响程度。通过中线的针刺法评估感觉阻滞的高度,并将镇痛起效确定为扩散高度。局部麻醉剂溶液的注射速度为每秒0.25、0.5和1毫升。针的尺寸为22、25和29号。每组由15名患者组成。结果。结果表明,缓慢(0.25毫升/秒)和快速(1毫升/秒)注射与比中等速度(0.5毫升/秒)显著更高的镇痛水平相关。前两组的头端扩散至T7,而中等注射速度仅达到T9水平。结果具有统计学意义(P小于0.05)。对用于脊髓麻醉的不同针尺寸(22、25和29号)的比较表明,在注射速度恒定的情况下,随着脊髓针直径的增加,感觉阻滞的扩散更高。使用22号针(n = 15)时,感觉阻滞平均扩展至T7,使用25号针(n = 15)时扩展至T9,使用29号针(n = 15)时扩展至T10。然而,必须提到的是,由于内径小,使用29号针时无法达到0.5毫升/秒的标准注射速度。22号和25号针之间的差异具有统计学意义(P小于0.05)。讨论。不同注射速度与阻滞范围之间未能证明有直接关系。我们的结果很难与其他研究者的结果进行比较,因为其他组使用了不同的局部麻醉剂或在体外进行研究。使用大的脊髓针与脊髓阻滞扩散到比细针显著更高的水平相关。(摘要截断于400字)