• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性子宫切除术加辅助放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移多个的预后意义。

The prognostic significance of multiple pelvic node metastases in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Mar;22(3):490-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823c369b.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823c369b
PMID:22367323
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the prognostic significance of multiple pelvic node metastases in cervical cancer patients who were treated with radical hysterectomy plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 311 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy plus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) between January 1998 and December 2008. Of these, 119 received adjuvant RT and 192 received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) postoperatively. Multivariate analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to investigate the prognostic significance of pelvic node metastases in the 2 treatment groups. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated pelvic node metastasis to be an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS in both treatment groups. When the node-positive patients were analyzed according to the number of positive pelvic nodes, we found that the patients with multiple pelvic node metastases (≥3) displayed significantly shorter PFS than those with 1 or 2 pelvic node metastases in the RT group. In contrast, in the CCRT group, the PFS of the patients with multiple pelvic node metastases (≥3) was similar to that observed of the patients with 1 or 2 pelvic node metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of multiple pelvic node metastases was not an independent predictor of shorter PFS in the CCRT group.

摘要

目的

我们研究了接受根治性子宫切除术加辅助放化疗的宫颈癌患者中多个盆腔淋巴结转移的预后意义。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 1998 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间接受根治性子宫切除术加辅助放疗(RT)治疗的 311 例国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IB1-IIB 期宫颈癌患者的病历。其中 119 例接受辅助 RT,192 例术后接受辅助同期放化疗(CCRT)。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型对无进展生存期(PFS)进行多变量分析,以探讨 2 种治疗组中盆腔淋巴结转移的预后意义。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存率,并采用对数秩检验进行比较。

结果

多变量分析表明,在 2 种治疗组中,盆腔淋巴结转移均是 PFS 较短的独立预后因素。当根据阳性盆腔淋巴结数量对淋巴结阳性患者进行分析时,我们发现 RT 组中存在多个盆腔淋巴结转移(≥3)的患者 PFS 明显短于存在 1 或 2 个盆腔淋巴结转移的患者。相比之下,在 CCRT 组中,存在多个盆腔淋巴结转移(≥3)的患者的 PFS 与存在 1 或 2 个盆腔淋巴结转移的患者相似。

结论

在 CCRT 组中,多个盆腔淋巴结转移不是 PFS 较短的独立预测因素。

相似文献

1
The prognostic significance of multiple pelvic node metastases in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy plus adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.根治性子宫切除术加辅助放化疗治疗宫颈癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移多个的预后意义。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Mar;22(3):490-7. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823c369b.
2
Impact of the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to pelvic radiotherapy in surgically treated stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk factors: a 13-year experience.手术治疗的 IB1 期-IIB 期宫颈癌伴中危或高危因素患者中,同期放化疗对盆腔放疗的影响:13 年经验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Mar;23(3):567-75. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31828703fd.
3
Long-term survival in patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis with systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma.系统腹膜后淋巴结清扫术联合辅助化疗治疗子宫内膜癌合并腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者的长期生存。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Aug;20(6):1000-5. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181d80aff.
4
Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes.切除的盆腔淋巴结数目作为 FIGO 期 IB1 淋巴结阴性宫颈癌的预后标志物。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):946-952. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.根治性子宫切除术和系统淋巴结清扫术后高危宫颈癌的辅助化疗与同期放化疗比较。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;21(4):741-747. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0955-3. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Prognostic factors affecting the outcome of early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and post-operative adjuvant therapy.影响早期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除及术后辅助治疗结局的预后因素。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Mar;17(2):174-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00831.x.
7
Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.早期宫颈癌经腹与腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较:手术和疾病结局无差异。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Jan;22(1):107-14. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822c273d.
8
Adjuvant therapy after radical surgery for stage IB-IIB cervical adenocarcinoma with risk factors.伴有危险因素的ⅠB - ⅡB期宫颈腺癌根治术后的辅助治疗。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;47(1):32-38. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw145. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
10
Concurrent chemotherapy and adjuvant extended field irradiation after radical surgery for cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastases.对于有淋巴结转移的宫颈癌患者,在根治性手术后进行同步化疗和辅助扩大野照射。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):779-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01088.x. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk stratification of node-positive early-stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy followed by chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective single-center study.根治性子宫切除术后同步放化疗治疗的淋巴结阳性早期宫颈癌的风险分层:一项回顾性单中心研究
Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 13;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02655-2.
2
Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors.FIGO 2018 期 IIIC 宫颈癌不同局部肿瘤因素的治疗。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 9;23(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w.
3
Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer: efficacy, toxicity and prognosis.
国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IIIC1期宫颈癌患者的图像引导调强放疗:疗效、毒性和预后
J Cancer. 2023 Apr 9;14(6):1001-1010. doi: 10.7150/jca.81953. eCollection 2023.
4
Significance of the Number and the Location of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Locally Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Salvage Hysterectomy plus Lymphadenectomy.挽救性子宫切除术加淋巴结切除术治疗局部复发性或持续性宫颈癌患者的转移淋巴结数量和位置的意义。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;29(7):4856-4867. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070385.
5
Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study.基于肿瘤学结局探讨2018年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)宫颈癌IIIC期分期的合理性:一项队列研究
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(2):122. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6374.
6
Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathological Factors Influencing Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.影响宫颈癌患者总生存和无事件生存的临床病理因素的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Mar 9;28:e934588. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934588.
7
Diagnostic Value of F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer.¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI对2018年FIGO修订版宫颈癌分期的诊断价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;11(2):202. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020202.
8
A low preoperative albumin-to-globulin ratio is a negative prognostic factor in patients with surgically treated cervical cancer.术前白蛋白与球蛋白比值低是手术治疗宫颈癌患者的不良预后因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 May;26(5):980-985. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-01861-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
9
Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?转移性盆腔淋巴结的数量是否应纳入2018年FIGO早期宫颈癌分期分类?
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;12(6):1552. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061552.
10
A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.2018FIGO 分期系统中 IIIC1 期宫颈癌患者的风险分层。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):362. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3.