Department of Gynecology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Mar;23(3):567-75. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31828703fd.
To identify groups of patients who derive clinical benefit from postoperative adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), we retrospectively investigated the survival outcomes of surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer patients.
We reviewed the medical records of 316 patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer who had been treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) (n = 124, RT group) or adjuvant CCRT (n = 192, CCRT group) after radical hysterectomy between January 1996 and December 2009. Of these, 187 patients displayed high-risk prognostic factors (high-risk group), and 129 displayed intermediate-risk prognostic factors (intermediate-risk group). Sixty patients with 1 intermediate-risk prognostic factor who received no adjuvant therapy were also identified and used as controls (NFT group). Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
In the high-risk group, adjuvant CCRT was significantly superior to RT alone with regard to recurrence rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. In the intermediate-risk group, CCRT was superior to RT with regard to recurrence rate and PFS in patents with 2 or more risk factors. Among the patients with only 1 intermediate-risk factor, although no survival benefit of CCRT over RT was observed, addition of adjuvant treatment resulted in significantly improved PFS compared with the NFT group in patients with deep stromal invasion (log-rank, P = 0.012).
Postoperative CCRT improved the prognosis of FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer patients in the high-risk group and patients who displayed 2 or more intermediate-risk factors. Patients who displayed deep stromal invasion alone also derived clinical benefit from adjuvant treatment.
为了确定术后辅助同步放化疗(CCRT)能使哪些患者获得临床获益,我们回顾性分析了接受根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者的生存结局。
我们回顾性分析了 1996 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间接受辅助放疗(RT)(n = 124,RT 组)或辅助 CCRT(n = 192,CCRT 组)治疗的 316 例国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期 IB1-IIB 宫颈癌患者的病历。其中,187 例患者具有高危预后因素(高危组),129 例患者具有中危预后因素(中危组)。还纳入了 60 例具有 1 个中危预后因素但未接受辅助治疗的患者作为对照组(NFT 组)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存率,并采用对数秩检验进行比较。
在高危组中,与单独接受 RT 相比,辅助 CCRT 显著降低了复发率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。在中危组中,对于具有 2 个或更多危险因素的患者,CCRT 优于 RT。在仅有 1 个中危因素的患者中,虽然 CCRT 并未提高 RT 的生存率,但与 NFT 组相比,深肌层浸润患者的辅助治疗明显改善了 PFS(对数秩检验,P = 0.012)。
CCRT 改善了高危组和具有 2 个或更多中危因素的 FIGO 分期 IB1-IIB 宫颈癌患者的预后。单纯深肌层浸润的患者也能从辅助治疗中获益。