• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为测试灵敏度和测试特异性函数的诊断测试的通道容量。

The channel capacity of a diagnostic test as a function of test sensitivity and test specificity.

作者信息

Benish William A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):1044-52. doi: 10.1177/0962280212439742. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1177/0962280212439742
PMID:22368178
Abstract

We apply the information theory concept of "channel capacity" to diagnostic test performance and derive an expression for channel capacity in terms of test sensitivity and test specificity. The expected value of the amount of information a diagnostic test will provide is equal to the "mutual information" between the test result and the disease state. For the case in which only two test results and two disease states are considered, mutual information, I(D;R), is a function of sensitivity, specificity, and the pretest probability of disease. The channel capacity of the test is the maximal value of I(D;R) for a given sensitivity and specificity. After deriving an expression for I(D;R) in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and pretest probability, we solve for the value of pretest probability that maximizes I(D;R). Channel capacity is obtained by using this value of pretest probability to calculate I(D;R). Channel capacity provides a convenient and meaningful single parameter measure of diagnostic test performance. It quantifies the upper limit of the amount of information a diagnostic test can be expected to provide about a patient's disease state.

摘要

我们将“信道容量”这一信息论概念应用于诊断测试性能,并根据测试灵敏度和测试特异性推导出信道容量的表达式。诊断测试将提供的信息量的期望值等于测试结果与疾病状态之间的“互信息”。对于仅考虑两种测试结果和两种疾病状态的情况,互信息I(D;R)是灵敏度、特异性和疾病预测试概率的函数。测试的信道容量是给定灵敏度和特异性下I(D;R)的最大值。在根据灵敏度、特异性和预测试概率推导出I(D;R)的表达式后,我们求解使I(D;R)最大化的预测试概率值。通过使用此预测试概率值来计算I(D;R),从而获得信道容量。信道容量为诊断测试性能提供了一种方便且有意义的单参数度量。它量化了诊断测试有望提供的关于患者疾病状态信息量的上限。

相似文献

1
The channel capacity of a diagnostic test as a function of test sensitivity and test specificity.作为测试灵敏度和测试特异性函数的诊断测试的通道容量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):1044-52. doi: 10.1177/0962280212439742. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
2
Intuitive and axiomatic arguments for quantifying diagnostic test performance in units of information.以信息单位量化诊断测试性能的直观且公理式论据。
Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(6):552-7. doi: 10.3414/ME0627. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
3
Mutual information as an index of diagnostic test performance.互信息作为诊断试验性能指标。
Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(3):260-4.
4
The use of information graphs to evaluate and compare diagnostic tests.使用信息图评估和比较诊断测试。
Methods Inf Med. 2002;41(2):114-8.
5
Relative entropy as a measure of diagnostic information.作为诊断信息度量的相对熵
Med Decis Making. 1999 Apr-Jun;19(2):202-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900211.
6
Beyond the 2×2 -contingency table: a primer on entropies and mutual information in various scenarios involving m diagnostic categories and n categories of diagnostic tests.超越 2×2 contingency 表:涉及 m 个诊断类别和 n 个诊断测试类别的各种场景中熵和互信息的入门介绍。
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Oct 21;425:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Informational analysis: a Shannon theoretic approach to measure the performance of a diagnostic test.信息分析:一种用于衡量诊断测试性能的香农理论方法。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Sep;53(9):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1294-7. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.运用证据确定诊断试验的效能。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
9
Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.理解诊断测试2:似然比、检验前概率和检验后概率及其在临床实践中的应用。
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Apr;96(4):487-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00179.x. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
10
Diagnostic testing, pre- and post-test probabilities, and their use in clinical practice.诊断测试、测试前和测试后的概率及其在临床实践中的应用。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Sep;23(9):1187-98.

引用本文的文献

1
An information-oriented paradigm in evaluating accuracy and agreement in radiology.一种面向信息的医学影像学准确性和一致性评估范式。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2023 Mar 20;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00327-y.
2
Fifty years of Shannon information theory in assessing the accuracy and agreement of diagnostic tests.五十年来香农信息理论在评估诊断试验准确性和一致性中的应用。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022 Apr;60(4):941-955. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02494-9. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
3
Mutual Information as a Performance Measure for Binary Predictors Characterized by Both ROC Curve and PROC Curve Analysis.
以ROC曲线和PROC曲线分析为特征的二元预测器的互信息作为一种性能度量
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Aug 26;22(9):938. doi: 10.3390/e22090938.
4
A Review of the Application of Information Theory to Clinical Diagnostic Testing.信息论在临床诊断测试中的应用综述
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jan 14;22(1):97. doi: 10.3390/e22010097.
5
Beyond kappa: an informational index for diagnostic agreement in dichotomous and multivalue ordered-categorical ratings.超越卡帕:二分类和多值有序分类评分诊断一致性的信息指标。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020 Dec;58(12):3089-3099. doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02261-2. Epub 2020 Nov 3.