Girometti Rossano, Fabris Francesco
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Biologiche, Istituto di Radiologia Diagnostica, Università degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy.
Dipartimento di Matematica e Geoscienze, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Sep;53(9):899-910. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1294-7. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
Diagnostic test accuracy, based on sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (dichotomous case), and on ROC analysis (continuous case), should be expressed with a single, coherent index. We propose to modelize the diagnostic test as a flow of information between the disease, that is, a hidden state of the patient, and the physicians. We assume that (1) sensitivity, specificity, and false-positive/false-negative rates are the probabilities of a binary asymmetric channel; (2) the diagnostic channel information is measured by mutual information. We introduce two summary measures of accuracy, namely the information ratio (IR) for the dichotomous case, and the global information ratio (GIR) for the continuous case. We apply our model to a study by Pisano et al. (N Engl J Med 353(17):1773-1783, 2005), who compared digital versus film mammography, in diagnosing breast cancer in a screening population of 42,760 women. In film mammography, the maximum IR (0.178) corresponds to the standard cutoff of sensitivity and specificity provided by the ROC analysis (GIR 0.200). Maximum IR and GIR for digital mammography are higher (0.201 and 0.229, respectively), but IR corresponds to a cutoff with higher sensitivity but lower specificity, thus suggesting that larger information provided by digital mammography carries the risk of more false-positive cases.
基于灵敏度、特异度、阳性/阴性预测值(二分法病例)以及ROC分析(连续型病例)的诊断试验准确性,应以单一、连贯的指标来表示。我们建议将诊断试验建模为疾病(即患者的隐藏状态)与医生之间的信息流。我们假设:(1)灵敏度、特异度以及假阳性/假阴性率是二元不对称通道的概率;(2)诊断通道信息通过互信息来衡量。我们引入了两种准确性的汇总指标,即二分法病例的信息比(IR)和连续型病例的全局信息比(GIR)。我们将我们的模型应用于Pisano等人的一项研究(《新英格兰医学杂志》353(17):1773 - 1783, 2005),该研究比较了数字乳腺摄影与胶片乳腺摄影在42760名女性筛查人群中诊断乳腺癌的情况。在胶片乳腺摄影中,最大IR(0.178)对应于ROC分析提供的灵敏度和特异度的标准截断值(GIR 0.200)。数字乳腺摄影的最大IR和GIR更高(分别为0.201和0.229),但IR对应的截断值具有更高的灵敏度但更低的特异度,因此表明数字乳腺摄影提供的更多信息伴随着更多假阳性病例的风险。