Suppr超能文献

保密性:反对伪装,赞成同意。

Confidentiality: against disguise, for consent.

机构信息

William Alanson White Institute of Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and Psychology.

出版信息

Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012 Mar;49(1):16-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027145.

Abstract

I am in favor of asking patients for permission to publish clinical material about them, but am against disguising clinical material. Altering facts to disguise a patient's identity is like publishing false scientific data. Instead, details should be omitted unless they are crucial. While there are quite a few reports of patients who were offended by publications with their clinical material, some patients may be offended if the clinician does not use their material. Whatever the procedure for requesting consent, the tone and mindset of the therapist are critical. There must be clarity, in the clinician's mind and communications, that the patient can refuse consent with no adverse consequences.

摘要

我赞成向患者征求发布其临床资料的许可,但反对伪装临床资料。为了伪装患者身份而篡改事实,就如同发表虚假的科学数据。相反,除非这些资料至关重要,否则应该省略。虽然有相当多的报道称,一些患者对发表他们的临床资料感到不满,但如果临床医生不使用他们的资料,有些患者也可能会感到不满。无论征求同意的程序如何,治疗师的态度和心态都至关重要。在治疗师的想法和沟通中,必须明确表示,患者可以拒绝同意,而不会产生任何不利后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验