Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 986 MCLM 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Jun;62(7):2354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
Many antidepressant drugs, including the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine (DMI), are broadly understood to function by modulating central noradrenergic neurotransmission. α(2) adrenergic receptors (α(2)ARs) are key regulators of the noradrenergic system, and previous work has implicated α(2)ARs in mediating the antidepressant activity of DMI in the rodent forced swim test (FST). However, little is known about intracellular regulators of antidepressant drug action. α(2)AR function is tightly regulated by its intracellular interacting partners arrestin and the dendritic protein spinophilin. We have previously established the competitive and reciprocal nature of these interacting proteins at the α(2)AR in the context of classic agonist effects, and have shown DMI to be a direct arrestin-biased ligand at the receptor. In the present study, we report that mice deficient in the α(2A)AR subtype lack DMI-induced antidepressant behavioral effects in the FST. As well, mice deficient in arrestin3 lack antidepressant response to DMI, while spinophilin-null mice have enhanced antidepressant response to DMI compared with wild-type controls, indicating that this α(2A)AR-mediated response is reciprocally regulated by arrestin and spinophilin. The characteristic of α(2A)AR-dependence and arrestin3 involvement was shared by the antidepressant effect of the classic α(2)AR agonist clonidine but not the non-tricyclic norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine, supporting a model whereby DMI exerts its antidepressant effect through direct engagement of the α(2A)AR and arrestin3. Our results implicate arrestin- and spinophilin-mediated regulation of the α(2A)AR in the pharmacology of the noradrenergic antidepressant DMI, and suggest that manipulation of this mode of receptor regulation may represent a novel and viable therapeutic strategy.
许多抗抑郁药,包括三环类抗抑郁药去甲替林(DMI),被广泛认为通过调节中枢去甲肾上腺素能神经传递起作用。α(2)肾上腺素能受体(α(2)AR)是去甲肾上腺素能系统的关键调节剂,先前的工作表明α(2)AR 参与介导 DMI 在啮齿动物强迫游泳试验(FST)中的抗抑郁作用。然而,对于抗抑郁药作用的细胞内调节剂知之甚少。α(2)AR 功能受其细胞内相互作用伙伴抑制素和树突状蛋白 spinophilin 的紧密调节。我们之前已经在经典激动剂效应的背景下确定了这些相互作用蛋白在 α(2)AR 上的竞争和相互作用性质,并表明 DMI 是受体的直接抑制素偏向配体。在本研究中,我们报告说,缺乏 α(2A)AR 亚型的小鼠在 FST 中缺乏 DMI 诱导的抗抑郁行为效应。同样,缺乏抑制素 3 的小鼠对 DMI 没有抗抑郁反应,而 spinophilin 缺失的小鼠对 DMI 的抗抑郁反应增强,与野生型对照相比,表明这种 α(2A)AR 介导的反应受到抑制素和 spinophilin 的相互调节。经典 α(2)AR 激动剂可乐定的抗抑郁作用和 arrestin3 的参与具有 α(2A)AR 依赖性,而非三环类去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂瑞波西汀则不具有,支持 DMI 通过直接结合 α(2A)AR 和 arrestin3 发挥其抗抑郁作用的模型。我们的结果表明,arrestin 和 spinophilin 介导的 α(2A)AR 调节参与了去甲肾上腺素能抗抑郁药 DMI 的药理学,并且表明这种受体调节方式的操纵可能代表一种新的可行的治疗策略。