Chapman J Luke
Aust Orthod J. 2011 Nov;27(2):139-44.
To evaluate the bond failure rates of two self-ligating appliance systems bonded with a self-etching primer.
Forty patients were randomly assigned to either Group SC (SmartClip, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) or Group IR (In-Ovation R, GAC International, Bohemia, NY, USA) appliance groups. Seven hundred and sixty six brackets were bonded with Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer and Transbond Plus Color Change Adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions. Over a 12-month period, the survival rates of the brackets were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The survival distributions for the appliance systems, dental arch and position in the dental arch were compared with the log-rank test.
The bond failure rate for SC was significantly lower than IR (p = 0.022). There were no differences in failure rates between either the maxillary and mandibular arches or between the anterior and posterior brackets.
SC provided a more reliable bond than IR over the 12-month observation period, however, both brackets had clinically acceptable bond failure rates.
评估两种使用自酸蚀底漆粘结的自锁矫治器系统的粘结失败率。
40名患者被随机分为两组,分别使用SC矫治器组(SmartClip,3M Unitek公司,美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)或IR矫治器组(In-Ovation R,GAC International公司,美国纽约州波希米亚)。根据制造商的说明,用Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆和Transbond Plus变色粘合剂粘结766个托槽。在12个月的时间里,采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估托槽的留存率。使用对数秩检验比较矫治器系统、牙弓以及牙弓内位置的留存分布情况。
SC组的粘结失败率显著低于IR组(p = 0.022)。上颌和下颌牙弓之间以及前牙和后牙托槽之间的失败率没有差异。
在12个月的观察期内,SC比IR提供了更可靠的粘结,然而,两种托槽的粘结失败率在临床上都可接受。