Suppr超能文献

两种自锁托槽的粘结失败率:一项随机临床试验

Bond failure rates of two self-ligating brackets: a randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Chapman J Luke

出版信息

Aust Orthod J. 2011 Nov;27(2):139-44.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the bond failure rates of two self-ligating appliance systems bonded with a self-etching primer.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to either Group SC (SmartClip, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) or Group IR (In-Ovation R, GAC International, Bohemia, NY, USA) appliance groups. Seven hundred and sixty six brackets were bonded with Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer and Transbond Plus Color Change Adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions. Over a 12-month period, the survival rates of the brackets were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The survival distributions for the appliance systems, dental arch and position in the dental arch were compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The bond failure rate for SC was significantly lower than IR (p = 0.022). There were no differences in failure rates between either the maxillary and mandibular arches or between the anterior and posterior brackets.

CONCLUSION

SC provided a more reliable bond than IR over the 12-month observation period, however, both brackets had clinically acceptable bond failure rates.

摘要

目的

评估两种使用自酸蚀底漆粘结的自锁矫治器系统的粘结失败率。

方法

40名患者被随机分为两组,分别使用SC矫治器组(SmartClip,3M Unitek公司,美国加利福尼亚州蒙罗维亚)或IR矫治器组(In-Ovation R,GAC International公司,美国纽约州波希米亚)。根据制造商的说明,用Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆和Transbond Plus变色粘合剂粘结766个托槽。在12个月的时间里,采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估托槽的留存率。使用对数秩检验比较矫治器系统、牙弓以及牙弓内位置的留存分布情况。

结果

SC组的粘结失败率显著低于IR组(p = 0.022)。上颌和下颌牙弓之间以及前牙和后牙托槽之间的失败率没有差异。

结论

在12个月的观察期内,SC比IR提供了更可靠的粘结,然而,两种托槽的粘结失败率在临床上都可接受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验