• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正畸治疗期间正畸托槽脱落的发生率:一项系统评价

Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review.

作者信息

Almosa Naif, Zafar Hamayun

机构信息

Dr. Naif Almosa, BDS, NSBO, PhD. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Dr. Hamayun Zafar, PT, PhD. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences and Rehabilitation Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Department of Odontology, Clinical Oral Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umea University, Sweden.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):744-750. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.15012.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.343.15012
PMID:30034451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6041531/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

Using electronic databases; eligible studies up to January 2018 were retrieved, independently reviewed, and screened. The Coleman Methodology Scoring System (CMS) and Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to assess quality and risk of bias in the included studies.

RESULTS

Of the seventeen studies included in the final synthesis, thirteen were categorized as randomized clinical trials (RCTs), one prospective cohort and retrospective survey each, whereas two studies could not be categorized. The number of patients in the selected studies ranged between 19 and 153; the mean age was between 10.5 to 38.7 years, and male to female ratio was 353:495. Almost all studies had a high risk of bias, and more than half of the studies had CMS score of 70 or above. The numbers of brackets examined in the studies ranged between 361 and 3336. The incidence of brackets detachment ranged from 0.6 to 28.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment is high.

摘要

目的

评估正畸治疗期间正畸托槽脱落的发生率。

方法

利用电子数据库;检索截至2018年1月符合条件的研究,进行独立评审和筛选。采用科尔曼方法评分系统(CMS)和Cochrane协作网的工具来评估纳入研究的质量和偏倚风险。

结果

在最终纳入的17项研究中,13项被归类为随机临床试验(RCT),1项为前瞻性队列研究,1项为回顾性调查,而2项研究无法归类。所选研究中的患者人数在19至153之间;平均年龄在10.5至38.7岁之间,男女比例为353:495。几乎所有研究都有较高的偏倚风险,超过一半的研究CMS评分为70或以上。研究中检查的托槽数量在361至3336之间。托槽脱落的发生率在0.6%至28.3%之间。

结论

正畸治疗期间托槽脱落的发生率较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ed/6041531/782b7eb61c63/PJMS-34-744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ed/6041531/896bdc6d0d99/PJMS-34-744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ed/6041531/782b7eb61c63/PJMS-34-744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ed/6041531/896bdc6d0d99/PJMS-34-744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9ed/6041531/782b7eb61c63/PJMS-34-744-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review.正畸治疗期间正畸托槽脱落的发生率:一项系统评价
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):744-750. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.15012.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.托槽结扎对接受正畸治疗的青少年牙周状况的影响。系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
Fluorides for the prevention of early tooth decay (demineralised white lesions) during fixed brace treatment.在固定矫治器治疗期间使用氟化物预防早期龋齿(脱矿白色病变)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12(12):CD003809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003809.pub3.
5
Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.直接和间接托槽粘结技术在时间长度和托槽脱落方面的比较研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):51-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600009.
6
Adhesive precoated bracket systems and operator coated bracket systems: Is there any difference? .黏结剂预涂托槽系统和医师涂胶托槽系统:两者有区别吗?
Angle Orthod. 2019 May;89(3):495-504. doi: 10.2319/051818-373.1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces.用于粘结固定正畸矫治器的牙釉质酸蚀处理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 25;2013(11):CD005516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005516.pub2.
8
Fluorides for preventing early tooth decay (demineralised lesions) during fixed brace treatment.氟化物用于预防固定矫治器治疗期间的早期龋齿(脱矿病变)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 17;2019(11):CD003809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003809.pub4.
9
Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets.固定正畸托槽用胶粘剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 9;4(4):CD002282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002282.pub2.
10
The best method of reconditioning ceramic brackets to get an optimum shear bond strength compared with new ceramic brackets - Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.与新陶瓷托槽相比,修复陶瓷托槽以获得最佳剪切粘结强度的最佳方法-体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthod. 2023 Sep;21(3):100788. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100788. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Peritraumatic distress and its relationship to appliance-related orthodontic emergencies in orthodontic patients during the COVID-19 lockdown in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study.中国上海新冠疫情封控期间正畸患者的创伤后应激及其与正畸器械相关急症的关系:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 22;15(8):e095959. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095959.
2
Factors Related to Bracket Bond Failure during Orthodontic Treatment: A Single-Centre Single-Operator Study.正畸治疗期间托槽粘结失败的相关因素:一项单中心单操作者研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 24;12(10):300. doi: 10.3390/dj12100300.
3
Effect of different mouthwash solutions on the surface morphology, nanohardness and flexural modulus of nickel-titanium orthodontic wire.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective survey of the causes of bracket- and tube-bonding failures.一项关于托槽和颊面管粘结失败原因的回顾性调查。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Jan;87(1):111-117. doi: 10.2319/021616-136.1. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Orthodontic bonding with and without primer: a randomized controlled trial.使用和不使用底漆的正畸粘结:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2016 Oct;38(5):503-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv075. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
3
A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial.
不同漱口水溶液对镍钛正畸丝表面形态、纳米硬度和弯曲模量的影响
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Oct;40(9):2090-2095. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.9428.
4
Metallic vs Ceramic Bracket Failures After 12 Months of Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Trial.金属托槽与陶瓷托槽在治疗 12 个月后的失败率:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Int Dent J. 2024 Dec;74(6):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.023. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Does surface priming increase the bond strength of orthodontic brackets? An experimental study.表面预处理能否提高正畸托槽的粘接强度?一项实验研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e888. doi: 10.1002/cre2.888.
6
Survival rate of indirectly bonded brackets using single vs. two-component orthodontic adhesive: A 12-month split-mouth clinical trial.使用单组分与双组分正畸粘合剂时间接粘结托槽的存活率:一项为期12个月的半口临床试验。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Sep;35(6):657-662. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Composites Containing Silver and Amorphous Tricalcium Phosphate Nanoparticles: an Study.含银和无定形磷酸三钙纳米颗粒的正畸复合材料剪切粘结强度的比较:一项研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2023 Sep;24(3):285-292. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2022.94075.1760.
8
Effect of Different Types of Adhesive Agents on Orthodontic Bracket Shear Bond Strength: A Cyclic Loading Study.不同类型黏结剂对正畸托槽剪切黏结强度的影响:一项循环加载研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;16(2):724. doi: 10.3390/ma16020724.
9
Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive.比较四种粘结剂(树脂改良型玻璃离聚物粘结剂、复合树脂粘结剂、液体复合树脂粘结剂和一步光固化粘结剂)在 120 颗新鲜拔除的成年牛下中切牙牙釉质上的正畸托槽粘结强度。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Dec 21;28:e938867. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938867.
10
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after adding silver nanoparticles to a nano-bond adhesive at different thermal cycles and cyclic loading- An study.在不同热循环和循环加载条件下向纳米粘结剂中添加银纳米颗粒后正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度——一项研究
J Orthod Sci. 2022 May 4;11:28. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_183_21. eCollection 2022.
一项关于采用直接粘接技术与间接粘接技术粘接正畸托槽的粘接失败情况的15个月评估:一项临床试验。
Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9.
4
Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period.正畸患者下颌固定保持器的间接粘接与直接粘接:一项单中心随机对照试验,比较6个月期间的放置时间和失败情况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Dec;146(6):701-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.015.
5
Incidence of bracket failure during orthognathic surgery: a comparison of two techniques to establish interim maxillomandibular fixation.正颌手术中托槽脱落的发生率:两种建立临时颌间固定技术的比较
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;19(2):143-7. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0468-z. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
6
How and why of orthodontic bond failures: An in vivo study.正畸粘结失败的方式与原因:一项体内研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Jul;6(Suppl 1):S85-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.137394.
7
Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation.对Cochrane协作网随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具的评价:焦点小组、在线调查、建议及实施情况
Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 15;3:37. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-37.
8
Survival analysis of brackets and tubes: A twelve-month assessment.托槽与弓丝的生存分析:一项为期十二个月的评估。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):1034-40. doi: 10.2319/122613-946.1. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer.临床黏结失败率的黏结剂预涂自锁托槽采用自酸蚀底胶。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):155-60. doi: 10.2319/022013-149.1. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Clinical evaluation of the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with orthodontic composites.金属托槽与正畸复合材料粘结失败率的临床评估
Braz Dent J. 2012;23(4):399-402. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000400015.