• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公立与私立:医疗保险选择的证据

Public versus private: evidence on health insurance selection.

作者信息

Pardo Cristian, Schott Whitney

机构信息

Department of Economics, Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, PA 19131, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Mar;12(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9105-2. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-012-9105-2
PMID:22374192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3367436/
Abstract

This paper models health insurance choice in Chile (public versus private) as a dynamic, stochastic process, where individuals consider premiums, expected out-of pocket costs, personal characteristics and preferences. Insurance amenities and restrictions against pre-existing conditions among private insurers introduce asymmetry to the model. We confirm that the public system services a less healthy and wealthy population (adverse selection for public insurance). Simulation of choices over time predicts a slight crowding out of private insurance only for the most pessimistic scenario in terms of population aging and the evolution of education. Eliminating the restrictions on pre-existing conditions would slightly ameliorate the level (but not the trend) of the disproportionate accumulation of less healthy individuals in the public insurance program over time.

摘要

本文将智利的医疗保险选择(公共保险与私人保险)建模为一个动态随机过程,在此过程中,个人会考虑保费、预期自付费用、个人特征和偏好。私人保险公司的保险福利以及对已有疾病的限制给该模型引入了不对称性。我们证实,公共保险体系服务于健康状况较差且较为富裕的人群(公共保险存在逆向选择)。对随时间变化的选择进行模拟预测,只有在人口老龄化和教育发展最悲观的情况下,私人保险才会出现轻微的挤出效应。消除对已有疾病的限制会在一定程度上缓解随着时间推移公共保险项目中健康状况较差的个人不成比例积累的程度(但不会改变趋势)。

相似文献

1
Public versus private: evidence on health insurance selection.公立与私立:医疗保险选择的证据
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Mar;12(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9105-2. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
2
Health care reform, adverse selection and health insurance choice.医疗改革、逆向选择与医疗保险选择。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
3
The mandatory health insurance system in Chile: explaining the choice between public and private insurance.智利的强制性医疗保险制度:解读公共保险与私人保险之间的选择
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):97-110. doi: 10.1023/a:1012886810415.
4
Health insurance selection in Chile: a cross-sectional and panel analysis.智利的医疗保险选择:横断面与面板分析
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):302-12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt017. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
[What does the decision to opt for private health insurance reveal about public provision?].选择购买私人医疗保险的决定能揭示出关于公共医疗服务的哪些信息?
Gac Sanit. 2019 Sep-Oct;33(5):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Out-of-pocket health expenditure differences in Chile: Insurance performance or selection?智利的自付医疗支出差异:保险绩效还是选择?
Health Policy. 2018 Feb;122(2):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Public and private health insurance in Germany: the ignored risk selection problem.德国的公共和私人健康保险:被忽视的风险选择问题。
Health Econ. 2014 Jun;23(6):670-87. doi: 10.1002/hec.2942. Epub 2013 May 21.
8
Risk Selection under Public Health Insurance with Opt-Out.可选择退出的公共医疗保险下的风险选择
Health Econ. 2016 Sep;25(9):1163-81. doi: 10.1002/hec.3351. Epub 2016 May 30.
9
Are market-oriented health insurance reforms possible in Latin America? The cases of Argentina, Chile and Colombia.拉丁美洲能否进行以市场为导向的医疗保险改革?阿根廷、智利和哥伦比亚的案例。
Health Policy. 1999 Apr;47(1):19-36. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00006-8.
10
Regulating self-selection into private health insurance in Chile and the United States.智利和美国对私人医疗保险自我选择的监管。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):e219-34. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2321. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Equity and efficiency effects of flat premiums.统一保费的公平性与效率影响。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):27-49. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
What Are the Determinants of the Decision to Purchase Private Health Insurance in China?中国购买商业健康保险的决定因素有哪些?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 24;17(15):5348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155348.
3
Health insurance selection in Chile: a cross-sectional and panel analysis.智利的医疗保险选择:横断面与面板分析
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):302-12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt017. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico: Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility.评估墨西哥学校补贴计划的影响:利用社会实验验证儿童教育和生育的动态行为模型。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Dec;96(5):1384-1417. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1384.
2
Price elasticity of expenditure across health care services.医疗服务支出的价格弹性。
J Health Econ. 2012 Dec;31(6):824-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
3
Crowd-out 10 years later: have recent public insurance expansions crowded out private health insurance?十年后的挤出效应:近期公共保险的扩张是否挤出了私人医疗保险?
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):201-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
4
The impact of SCHIP on insurance coverage of children.儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)对儿童保险覆盖范围的影响。
Inquiry. 2005 Fall;42(3):232-54. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.3.232.
5
The effect of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on health insurance coverage.儿童健康保险计划对医疗保险覆盖范围的影响。
J Health Econ. 2004 Sep;23(5):1059-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.006.
6
The mandatory health insurance system in Chile: explaining the choice between public and private insurance.智利的强制性医疗保险制度:解读公共保险与私人保险之间的选择
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):97-110. doi: 10.1023/a:1012886810415.
7
Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the National Medical Expenditure Survey.健康保险中的信息不对称:来自国家医疗支出调查的证据。
Rand J Econ. 2001 Autumn;32(3):408-27.
8
Did the Medicaid expansions for children displace private insurance? An analysis using the SIPP.儿童医疗补助计划的扩大是否取代了私人保险?一项使用收入动态调查面板数据(SIPP)的分析。
J Health Econ. 2000 Jan;19(1):33-60. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00020-x.
9
Medicaid expansions and the crowding out of private health insurance among children.医疗补助计划的扩张与儿童私人健康保险的挤出效应
Inquiry. 2000 Spring;37(1):23-32.
10
Did Medicaid expansions for pregnant women crowd out private coverage?为孕妇扩大医疗补助计划是否挤出了私人保险?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):185-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.185.