• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统一保费的公平性与效率影响。

Equity and efficiency effects of flat premiums.

作者信息

Pardo Cristian, Sabat Jorge

机构信息

Department of Economics, Saint Joseph's University, 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA.

Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):27-49. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x
PMID:39702625
Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of flat premiums on equity and efficiency within a regulated market. We examine the consequences of shifting from a risk-adjusted premium model to a flat premium system, particularly focusing on how this shift affects different income groups and market efficiency. Using a combination of theoretical modeling and empirical analysis, we find that flat premiums may lead to increased cross-subsidization among participants, with notable effects on both equity and efficiency. Our results suggest that while flat premiums simplify the regulatory framework, they also introduce trade-offs that policymakers must carefully consider.

摘要

本文分析了统一保费对受监管市场中公平性和效率的影响。我们研究了从风险调整保费模式转向统一保费制度的后果,特别关注这种转变如何影响不同收入群体和市场效率。通过理论建模和实证分析相结合的方法,我们发现统一保费可能会导致参与者之间交叉补贴增加,对公平性和效率都有显著影响。我们的结果表明,虽然统一保费简化了监管框架,但它们也带来了政策制定者必须仔细考虑的权衡。

相似文献

1
Equity and efficiency effects of flat premiums.统一保费的公平性与效率影响。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar;25(1):27-49. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09388-x. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
A functional model for monitoring equity and effectiveness in purchasing health insurance premiums for the poor: evidence from Cambodia and the Lao PDR.监测贫困人群购买健康保险保费公平性和有效性的功能模型:来自柬埔寨和老挝人民民主共和国的证据。
Health Policy. 2011 Oct;102(2-3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 May 6.
3
What should be the basis for compulsory and optional health insurance premiums? Opinions of Swiss doctors.强制性和选择性健康保险费的依据应该是什么?瑞士医生的意见。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Feb 4;144:w13918. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13918.
4
Growth and variability in health plan premiums in the individual insurance market before the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施之前个人保险市场中健康保险计划保费的增长与变化情况
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Jun;11:1-12.
5
Access to coverage for high-risks in a competitive individual health insurance market: via premium rate restrictions or risk-adjusted premium subsidies?在竞争激烈的个人健康保险市场中,为高风险人群提供保险覆盖:通过保费费率限制还是风险调整后的保费补贴?
J Health Econ. 2000 May;19(3):311-39. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00028-4.
6
Assessing potential enrollment and budgetary effects of SCHIP premiums: findings from Arizona and Kentucky.评估儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)保费的潜在参保影响和预算影响:来自亚利桑那州和肯塔基州的研究结果
Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 2):2354-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00772.x.
7
Insurer Competition In Federally Run Marketplaces Is Associated With Lower Premiums.联邦运营的医保市场中的保险公司竞争与更低的保费相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2027-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0548.
8
SCHIP premiums, enrollment, and expenditures: a two state, competing risk analysis.儿童健康保险计划保费、参保人数和支出:两州竞争风险分析。
Health Econ. 2010 Jul;19(7):772-91. doi: 10.1002/hec.1514.
9
Analysis of private health insurance premium growth rates: 1985-1992.1985 - 1992年私人医疗保险保费增长率分析
Med Care. 1995 Oct;33(10):1035-50. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199510000-00005.
10
Employer contribution and premium growth in health insurance.雇主在健康保险方面的缴费及保费增长。
J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;39:228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Health care reform, adverse selection and health insurance choice.医疗改革、逆向选择与医疗保险选择。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102221. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice.健康计划选择中的定价与福利
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Dec;102(7):3214-48. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3214.
3
Life cycle responses to health insurance status.
J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;49:76-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
Health insurance selection in Chile: a cross-sectional and panel analysis.智利的医疗保险选择:横断面与面板分析
Health Policy Plan. 2014 May;29(3):302-12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt017. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
Public versus private: evidence on health insurance selection.公立与私立:医疗保险选择的证据
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Mar;12(1):39-61. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9105-2. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
6
ESTIMATING WELFARE IN INSURANCE MARKETS USING VARIATION IN PRICES.利用价格变化估计保险市场中的福利
Q J Econ. 2010 Aug 1;125(3):877-921. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.877.
7
Precautionary Saving and Consumption Smoothing Across Time and Possibilities.跨时间和可能性的预防性储蓄与消费平滑
J Money Credit Bank. 2009;41(2):245-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00205.x.
8
The mandatory health insurance system in Chile: explaining the choice between public and private insurance.智利的强制性医疗保险制度:解读公共保险与私人保险之间的选择
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2001 Jun;1(2):97-110. doi: 10.1023/a:1012886810415.
9
Self-selection and moral hazard in Chilean health insurance.智利医疗保险中的自我选择与道德风险。
J Health Econ. 2003 May;22(3):459-76. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00121-2.
10
Time preferences for health gains: an empirical investigation.健康收益的时间偏好:一项实证研究。
Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):257-65. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020309.