Pain and Palliation Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;68(8):1147-56. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1228-3. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
Our aim was to compare pharmacological aspects of two switching strategies from morphine/oxycodone to methadone; the stop and go (SAG) strategy in which methadone is started directly after the initial opioid has been stopped, and the 3-days switch (3DS), in which morphine/oxycodone is gradually changed to methadone by cross-tapering over 3 days.
Forty-two cancer patients with pain and/or opioid side effects were assessed in this randomised trial. Trough serum concentrations of methadone, morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and oxycodone were measured on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14. Primary outcome was number of patients with methadone concentrations in apparent C(SS) on day 4. Secondary outcomes were exposure to opioids during the first 3 days, interindividual variation of opioid concentrations, and correlation between methadone concentrations and pain intensity (PI) day 3.
Thirty-five patients received methadone (16 in the SAG group, 19 in the 3DS group). The median preswitch morphine equivalent doses were 620 (range 350-2000) mg/day in the SAG group and 800 (range 90-3600) mg/day in the 3DS group (p = 0.43);42% reached C(SS) for methadone in the SAG group on day 4 compared with 22% in the 3DS group (p = 0.42). The SAG group was significantly less exposed to morphine/M6G/oxycodone and significantly more exposed to methadone in the first 3 days. Methadone showed a low correlation with PI. More patients dropped out after intervention in the SAG group than in the 3DS group (38% vs. 5%; p = 0.032). One SAG patient suffered from respiratory depression on day 5.
The SAG group was initially more exposed to methadone and less to the replaced opioids but without observed clinical benefit and with a higher dropout rate. Patients switched to methadone should be followed closely for the first 5 days, regardless of switching strategy.
本研究旨在比较两种从吗啡/羟考酮转换为美沙酮的策略的药理学方面:停止和开始(SAG)策略,即停用初始阿片类药物后直接开始使用美沙酮,以及 3 天转换(3DS)策略,通过 3 天交叉逐渐将吗啡/羟考酮转换为美沙酮。
在这项随机试验中,对 42 名患有疼痛和/或阿片类药物副作用的癌症患者进行了评估。在第 1、2、3、4、7 和 14 天,测量美沙酮、吗啡、吗啡-6-葡萄糖醛酸(M6G)和羟考酮的血清浓度。主要结果是第 4 天有多少患者出现美沙酮的表观 C(SS)浓度。次要结果是第 1 天至第 3 天期间的阿片类药物暴露量、阿片类药物浓度的个体间差异以及美沙酮浓度与疼痛强度(PI)第 3 天的相关性。
35 名患者接受了美沙酮治疗(SAG 组 16 例,3DS 组 19 例)。SAG 组的转换前吗啡等效剂量中位数为 620mg/天(范围 350-2000mg/天),3DS 组为 800mg/天(范围 90-3600mg/天)(p=0.43);SAG 组第 4 天有 42%的患者达到美沙酮的 C(SS),而 3DS 组为 22%(p=0.42)。SAG 组在前 3 天内,吗啡/M6G/羟考酮的暴露量明显减少,而美沙酮的暴露量明显增加。美沙酮与 PI 相关性较低。SAG 组在干预后比 3DS 组有更多的患者退出(38%比 5%;p=0.032)。SAG 组有 1 例患者在第 5 天出现呼吸抑制。
SAG 组最初接触美沙酮的频率更高,而接触替代阿片类药物的频率更低,但未观察到临床益处,且退出率更高。无论采用哪种转换策略,接受美沙酮转换的患者在前 5 天都应密切监测。