King's College London, School of Medicine, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London, School of Medicine, Department of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e79266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079266. eCollection 2014.
End-of-life cancer patients commonly receive more than one type of strong opioid. The three-step analgesic ladder framework of the World Health Organisation (WHO) provides no guidance on multiple opioid prescribing and there is little epidemiological data available to inform practice. This study aims to investigate the time trend of such cases and the associated factors.
Strong opioid prescribing in the last three months of life of cancer patients were extracted from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). The outcome variable was the number of different types of prescribed non-rescue doses of opioids (1 vs 2-4, referred to as a complex case). Associated factors were evaluated using prevalence ratios (PR) derived from multivariate log-binomial model, adjusting for clustering effects and potential confounding variables.
Overall, 26.4% (95% CI: 25.6-27.1%) of 13,427 cancer patients (lung 41.7%, colorectal 19.1%, breast 18.6%, prostate 15.5%, head and neck 5.0%) were complex cases. Complex cases increased steadily over the study period (1.02% annually, 95%CI: 0.42-1.61%, p = 0.048) but with a small dip (7.5% reduction, 95%CI: -0.03 to 17.8%) around the period of the Shipman case, a British primary care doctor who murdered his patients with opioids. The dip significantly affected the correlation of the complex cases with persistent increasing background opioid prescribing (weighted correlation coefficients pre-, post-Shipman periods: 0.98(95%CI: 0.67-1.00), p = 0.011; 0.14 (95%CI: -0.85 to 0.91), p = 0.85). Multivariate adjusted analysis showed that the complex cases were predominantly associated with year of death (PRs vs 2000: 1.05-1.65), not other demographic and clinical factors except colorectal cancer (PR vs lung cancer: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.12-1.37).
These findings suggest that prescribing behaviour, rather than patient factors, plays an important role in multiple opioid prescribing at the end of life; highlighting the need for training and education that goes beyond the well-recognised WHO approach for clinical practitioners.
临终癌症患者通常会接受不止一种强效阿片类药物。世界卫生组织(WHO)的三步镇痛阶梯框架对多种阿片类药物的处方没有提供指导,并且几乎没有可供实践参考的流行病学数据。本研究旨在调查此类病例的时间趋势及其相关因素。
从全科医学研究数据库(GPRD)中提取癌症患者生命最后三个月内的强效阿片类药物处方。因变量是开具的非急救剂量阿片类药物的不同类型数量(1 种与 2-4 种,称为复杂病例)。使用多变量对数二项式模型得出的患病率比(PR)评估相关因素,该模型调整了聚类效应和潜在混杂变量的影响。
总体而言,26.4%(95%CI:25.6-27.1%)的 13427 名癌症患者(肺癌 41.7%、结直肠癌 19.1%、乳腺癌 18.6%、前列腺癌 15.5%、头颈部癌 5.0%)为复杂病例。在研究期间,复杂病例的比例呈稳步上升趋势(每年增加 1.02%,95%CI:0.42-1.61%,p=0.048),但在希普曼案件期间略有下降(7.5%,95%CI:-0.03 至 17.8%),希普曼是一位英国初级保健医生,他用阿片类药物谋杀了他的病人。这一下降显著影响了复杂病例与持续增加的背景阿片类药物处方之间的相关性(希普曼案前后的加权相关系数:0.98(95%CI:0.67-1.00),p=0.011;0.14(95%CI:-0.85 至 0.91),p=0.85)。多变量调整分析表明,复杂病例主要与死亡年份相关(2000 年相比,PR 为 1.05-1.65),而不是其他人口统计学和临床因素,除了结直肠癌(2000 年相比,PR 为 1.24,95%CI:1.12-1.37)。
这些发现表明,在生命末期开具多种阿片类药物处方主要与处方行为有关,而不是患者因素,这突显了对临床医生进行超越世卫组织公认方法的培训和教育的必要性。