• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助保留神经的广泛子宫颈切除术:可行性和技术。

Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique.

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):206-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.454. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.454
PMID:22374890
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this research was to evaluate the feasibility of robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy.

METHODS

A 41 year-old patient was diagnosed with invasive cervical adenocarcinoma after simple hysterectomy. Hysterectomy margins were negative. A robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy was offered and performed 5 weeks later.

RESULTS

Total operating time was 330 min, blood loss was 145 ml and length of hospitalization 2 days. Pathology revealed no residual tumour. Normal bladder function resumed on postoperative day 9. At a follow-up of 16 months, the patient remains with no evidence of disease and with normal bladder and bowel function.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy is safe and feasible and can be offered to patients with indications for radical parametrectomy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估简单子宫切除术后行机器人辅助保留神经的根治性宫旁切除术治疗宫颈癌的可行性。

方法

一位 41 岁的患者在接受简单子宫切除术后被诊断为浸润性宫颈腺癌。子宫切除切缘阴性。我们为其提供并实施了机器人辅助保留神经的根治性宫旁切除术,手术时间为 5 周后。

结果

总手术时间为 330 分钟,术中出血量为 145 毫升,住院时间为 2 天。术后第 9 天,患者膀胱功能恢复正常。随访 16 个月,患者无疾病证据,且膀胱和肠道功能正常。

结论

机器人辅助保留神经的根治性宫旁切除术安全可行,可适用于有根治性宫旁切除术指征的患者。

相似文献

1
Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique.机器人辅助保留神经的广泛子宫颈切除术:可行性和技术。
Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):206-9. doi: 10.1002/rcs.454. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
2
Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results.机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术的保留神经技术:结果。
Int J Med Robot. 2013 Sep;9(3):339-44. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1480. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
3
[Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].[腹腔镜下保留神经的宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术:37例临床分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May;44(5):359-63.
4
Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer.浸润性宫颈癌患者的机器人根治性子宫旁组织切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):18-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
5
[Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].[宫颈癌患者行单侧或双侧保留神经根治性子宫切除术的可行性及术后膀胱和直肠功能恢复情况评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;33(1):53-7.
6
Robotic radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer.机器人辅助根治性子宫颈切除术治疗宫颈癌。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(3):179-82. doi: 10.1159/000324499. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
7
A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术的多机构经验。
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 May;113(2):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
8
Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?早期宫颈癌患者的机器人根治性子宫切除术,与全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术病例的结果比较。未来已来?
Int J Med Robot. 2007 Sep;3(3):224-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.152.
9
Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.宫颈癌外科治疗的最新进展
Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Dec;76(6):567-76. doi: 10.1002/msj.20149.
10
[A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].[宫颈癌患者保留神经的根治性子宫切除术的前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;43(8):606-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted radical parametrectomy in patients with malignant gynecological tumors.机器人辅助下妇科恶性肿瘤患者根治性宫旁组织切除术
J Robot Surg. 2013 Dec;7(4):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0387-7. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
2
Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留神经的宫颈癌根治术的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e94116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094116. eCollection 2014.