• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中途终止临床试验,入组患者不足。

Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects.

机构信息

Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek, Research Ethics Committee, PO Box 9101, Internal Code 578, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul;38(7):413-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100020. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2011-100020
PMID:22375078
Abstract

Medical research involving human subjects can be risky and burdensome. Therefore, such research must be reviewed and approved by a Research Ethics Committee (REC). To guarantee the safety of the subjects, it is very important that these studies be conducted in accordance with the approved protocol. An important issue in this respect is whether studies include the requisite number of subjects based on the research question. The research question is unlikely to be answered reliably if the requisite number of subjects is not met. In such cases, subjects are exposed to unnecessary risks and burdens. In this descriptive study, the authors evaluated how frequently studies are completed with the required number of subjects. Moreover, the authors identified the characteristics of research that does and does not include the required number of subjects. The results of this study show that a considerable proportion of studies (41/107) were terminated although they failed to recruit a sufficient number of subjects. Furthermore, the authors found that investigator-initiated studies have significantly (p=0.028) more problems in recruiting the requisite number of subjects than studies initiated by pharmaceutical companies. Potential solutions are discussed to reduce the number of studies that do not include a sufficient number of subjects.

摘要

医学研究涉及人类受试者可能存在风险和负担。因此,此类研究必须经过研究伦理委员会 (Research Ethics Committee, REC) 的审查和批准。为了保障受试者的安全,按照批准的方案进行这些研究非常重要。在这方面,一个重要的问题是研究是否根据研究问题包含了必要数量的受试者。如果没有达到必要的受试者数量,研究问题就不可能得到可靠的回答。在这种情况下,受试者会面临不必要的风险和负担。在这项描述性研究中,作者评估了研究完成所需数量受试者的频率。此外,作者还确定了包含和不包含必要数量受试者的研究的特征。本研究结果表明,尽管未能招募到足够数量的受试者,但相当一部分研究(41/107)已经终止。此外,作者发现,与由制药公司发起的研究相比,由研究者发起的研究在招募所需数量的受试者方面存在更多问题(p=0.028)。讨论了潜在的解决方案,以减少不包含足够数量受试者的研究数量。

相似文献

1
Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects.中途终止临床试验,入组患者不足。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul;38(7):413-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100020. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
2
The ethics of clinical research.临床研究的伦理
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Feb;36(2):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.012.
3
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
4
Does uncle Sam really want you? A response to "Rethinking research Ethics" by Rosamond Rhodes (AJOB 5:1).山姆大叔真的需要你吗?对罗莎蒙德·罗兹的《重新思考研究伦理》(《美国生物伦理学杂志》第5卷第1期)的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):W22-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160590944111.
5
[Clinical trials with minors in Germany--effects of the 12th amendment to the German Drug Code on the numbers of applications to Institutional Review Boards (IRB)].[德国针对未成年人的临床试验——《德国药品法典》第12次修订对向机构审查委员会(IRB)提交申请数量的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Mar;71(3):127-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103279. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
6
Ethical problems in the use of controls in medical research.医学研究中对照使用的伦理问题。
N Z Med J. 1988 Sep 28;101(854):608-10.
7
Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research.在需要者和贪婪者之间:寻求公正和公平的临床研究伦理。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):500-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032656.
8
Why the exclusion of older people from clinical research must stop.为何必须停止将老年人排除在临床研究之外的做法。
BMJ. 2012 May 21;344:e3445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3445.
9
Bias in surgical research.外科研究中的偏倚
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf4b.
10
Industry funded clinical trials: bias and quality.行业资助的临床试验:偏倚与质量。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jan;28(1):23-5. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.628651. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Competition for recruitment in SARS-CoV-2 Trials in the United States: a longitudinal cohort analysis.美国 SARS-CoV-2 临床试验中的招募竞争:一项纵向队列分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Dec 12;15(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06263-1.
2
The challenge of recruiting multimorbid older patients identified in a hospital database to a randomised controlled trial.从医院数据库中招募患有多种合并症的老年患者参加随机对照试验面临的挑战。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Dec;34(12):3115-3121. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02263-0. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
3
Analysis of the reasons for screening failure in phase I clinical trials in China: a retrospective study of the clinical trials screening process.
中国I期临床试验筛选失败原因分析:对临床试验筛选过程的回顾性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Oct;9(20):1564. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-5010.
4
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety disorders: results and lessons learned from the Danish cluster-randomized Collabri trials.合作治疗抑郁和焦虑障碍:丹麦整群随机对照 Collabri 试验的结果和经验教训。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01299-3.
5
Alternative Consent Models in Pragmatic Palliative Care Clinical Trials.实用主义姑息治疗临床试验中的替代同意模式。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Barriers to recruitment of children with cerebral palsy in a trial of home-based training.一项居家训练试验中招募脑瘫儿童的障碍
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 2;15:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100371. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Recruitment for exercise or physical activity interventions: a protocol for systematic review.运动或身体活动干预的招募:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e019546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019546.
8
Patients' beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials.患者对低风险实用临床试验知情同意的看法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0424-3.
9
Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study.瑞士主要公共资助机构支持的随机临床试验的终止和未发表情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e016216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016216.
10
Analysis of Requirements for the Medication Profile to Be Used in Clinical Research: Protocol Feasibility Studies and Patient Recruitment.临床研究中使用的用药档案要求分析:方案可行性研究与患者招募
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:932935. doi: 10.1155/2015/932935. Epub 2015 Oct 11.