Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jul;23(4):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
BACKGROUND: China has launched methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and needle and syringe exchange programmes (NSEP) as part of the country's HIV prevention strategy amongst injection drug users. MMT is expanding, with backing from multiple government ministries, however, NSEP have received less political support and funding. METHODS: Semi-structured, serial interviews were conducted with key informants, knowledgeable about China's harm reduction policies. Concurrent content analysis allowed for revision of the interview guide throughout the data collection process. This was combined with a systematic analysis of official government policy documents on NSEP and MMT, including white papers, legal documents, and policy statements. FINDINGS: Early consensus between public security and public health sectors regarding methadone's dual use in HIV prevention as well as method of drug control created broad institutional support for MMT programmes amongst policy makers. In contrast, NSEP were seen as satisfying only the HIV prevention goals of the public health sector, and were perceived as condoning illicit drug use. Furthermore, NSEP's roots in China, as an experimental collaboration with international groups, created suspicion regarding its role in China's drug control policy. NSEP and MMT's distinct paths to policy development are reflected in the complex and occasionally contradictory nature of China's harm reduction strategy. CONCLUSIONS: These discrepancies highlight the need for a more politically sustainable and comprehensive integration of harm reduction projects. Recommendations include improved evaluation methods for NESP, NSEP-MMT cross-referral system, and stronger NSEP advocacy within the non-profit and public health sectors.
背景:中国已启动美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)和针具交换计划(NSEP),作为其针对注射吸毒者的艾滋病毒预防战略的一部分。在中国,MMT 正在扩大,得到了多个政府部门的支持,然而,NSEP 获得的政治支持和资金却较少。
方法:对了解中国减少伤害政策的主要知情者进行了半结构式、连续访谈。同期内容分析允许在整个数据收集过程中对访谈指南进行修订。这与对 NSEP 和 MMT 的官方政府政策文件进行系统分析相结合,包括白皮书、法律文件和政策声明。
发现:公共安全和公共卫生部门之间就美沙酮在艾滋病毒预防方面的双重用途以及药物管制方法达成的早期共识,为决策者在 MMT 方案中创造了广泛的机构支持。相比之下,NSEP 被视为仅满足公共卫生部门的艾滋病毒预防目标,并被视为纵容非法药物使用。此外,NSEP 在中国的根源是与国际团体的实验性合作,这引发了对其在中国毒品管制政策中作用的怀疑。NSEP 和 MMT 的政策发展路径截然不同,反映了中国减少伤害战略的复杂性和有时相互矛盾的性质。
结论:这些差异突出表明需要更具政治可持续性和更全面地整合减少伤害项目。建议包括改进 NESP 的评估方法、NSEP-MMT 交叉转介系统,以及在非营利部门和公共卫生部门内加强 NSEP 的宣传。
Int J Drug Policy. 2012-2-28
Int J Drug Policy. 2007-3
Bull World Health Organ. 2013-2-1
Int J Drug Policy. 2009-7
Harm Reduct J. 2012-7-9
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019-10-16
Int J Drug Policy. 2014-11
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013-6
Int J Drug Policy. 2012-5-11
Lancet. 2010-11-27
Int J STD AIDS. 2009-6
Int J Drug Policy. 2009-7