Dong Hui-Yu, Qiang Zhi-Min, Wang Wei-Dong, Jin Hui
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Aquatic Chemistry, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China.
J Environ Monit. 2012 Jul;14(7):1906-13. doi: 10.1039/c2em10976j. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
With the rapid urbanization and industrialization in China, wastewater treatment in rural areas has become an increasing national concern. The selection of appropriate treatment processes closely based on the actual local status is crucial for the prevention of water quality deterioration in rural areas of China. This study presents a full year survey on the performances of various rural wastewater treatment processes at a county level in eastern China including seven three-chamber septic tanks (ST), five micro-power biological facilities (MP), seven constructed wetlands (CW), three stabilization ponds (SP) and five centralized activated sludge treatment plants (AS). It was found that although ST could remove a notable portion of total suspended solids (TSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD(Cr)), it was ineffective in reducing nutrients and pathogens. Reliability and stability analyses showed that the centralized AS and decentralized CW processes outperformed the SP and MP processes. There were obvious discrepancies between the mean design concentrations, which ensure that 95% of the effluents meet the discharge standards, and the actual effluent concentrations determined for each process. The expected compliance with the tentatively adopted second-grade discharge standards (GB 18918-2002) was unsatisfactory for most of the water quality parameters examined, indicating an urgent need to design more practical discharge standards for decentralized treatment processes. Based on an overall assessment of reliability, stability and cost-effectiveness, the centralized AS was suitable for densely populated towns while the decentralized CW was suitable for sparsely populated villages.
随着中国快速的城市化和工业化进程,农村地区的污水处理已日益受到全国关注。根据当地实际情况选择合适的处理工艺对于防止中国农村地区水质恶化至关重要。本研究对中国东部某县级地区的多种农村污水处理工艺进行了为期一年的调查,这些工艺包括七个三格化粪池(ST)、五个微动力生物处理设施(MP)、七个人工湿地(CW)、三个稳定塘(SP)和五个集中式活性污泥处理厂(AS)。研究发现,尽管三格化粪池能够去除相当一部分总悬浮固体(TSS)和化学需氧量(COD(Cr)),但在减少营养物质和病原体方面效果不佳。可靠性和稳定性分析表明,集中式活性污泥处理工艺和分散式人工湿地工艺优于稳定塘工艺和微动力生物处理设施工艺。各工艺的平均设计浓度(确保95%的出水达到排放标准)与实际出水浓度之间存在明显差异。对于大多数检测的水质参数而言,预期达到暂定的二级排放标准(GB 18918 - 2002)的情况并不理想,这表明迫切需要为分散式处理工艺设计更切实可行的排放标准。基于对可靠性、稳定性和成本效益的综合评估,集中式活性污泥处理工艺适合人口密集的城镇,而分散式人工湿地工艺适合人口稀少的村庄。