Departamento de Psicología Social, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, s/n. 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Mar;15(1):244-55. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37316.
The general purpose of this work is to analyze the overlap between organizational identification and commitment. Specifically, our study focuses on the analysis of the differences and similarities between sense of belonging (a dimension of organizational identification) and affective commitment (a dimension of organizational commitment). In order to do this, we analyzed their discriminant validity and raised their relationship with variables that previous research had showed like precedent and subsequent variables of them: value congruence, perceived support, organizational citizenship behavior, and intention to continue in the organization. A total of 292 people at one organization completed surveys measuring the variables previously described. The results showed that sense of belonging and affective commitment are different concepts and they have different relationships with relation to precedent and subsequent variables. Affective commitment seems to be more useful than sense of belonging to predict organizational citizenship behavior aimed at the organization and intention to continue. Some practical implications are described.
本研究旨在分析组织认同和承诺的重叠。具体来说,我们的研究重点是分析归属感(组织认同的一个维度)和情感承诺(组织承诺的一个维度)之间的差异和相似之处。为此,我们分析了它们的判别效度,并探讨了它们与先前研究表明的变量(如它们的前因和后续变量:价值一致性、感知支持、组织公民行为和继续留在组织的意愿)的关系。共有 292 人在一个组织中完成了测量先前描述的变量的调查。结果表明,归属感和情感承诺是不同的概念,它们与前因和后续变量的关系也不同。情感承诺似乎比归属感更能有效地预测针对组织的组织公民行为和继续留在组织的意愿。描述了一些实际意义。