• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病早期干预服务出院后的结果。

Outcomes post-discharge from an early intervention in psychosis service.

机构信息

Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, National Health Service, Ashington, UK.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;6(4):465-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2012.00349.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1111/j.1751-7893.2012.00349.x
PMID:22380405
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the effectiveness of an early intervention in psychosis (EIP) service on engagement and hospital bed usage, post-discharge. A secondary aim was to identify if there was a subgroup of patients with 'poor outcomes'.

METHOD

A naturalistic study comparing engagement and hospital bed day usage of individuals who received treatment from an EIP service (n = 75) with those who presented before the service was established (n = 113).

RESULTS

The EIP service demonstrated better engagement with service users in year 5 (P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed on hospital bed day usage. When 'poor outcome' cases were removed, a trend towards lower bed usage in EIP services emerged (P = 0.139).

CONCLUSION

EIP services improve engagement with service users. There was not a significant reduction in hospital bed usage. However, advantages could be masked by a relatively small number of individuals with 'poor outcomes'.

摘要

目的

调查精神病早期干预(EIP)服务对出院后参与度和住院床位使用的效果。次要目的是确定是否存在“预后不良”的患者亚组。

方法

一项自然主义研究比较了接受 EIP 服务治疗的个体(n=75)与该服务建立之前就诊的个体(n=113)的参与度和住院床位使用情况。

结果

EIP 服务在第 5 年表现出更好的服务使用者参与度(P=0.001)。在住院床位使用方面未观察到显著差异。当去除“预后不良”病例时,EIP 服务中出现了住院床位使用量降低的趋势(P=0.139)。

结论

EIP 服务提高了对服务使用者的参与度。住院床位使用量没有显著减少。然而,由于“预后不良”个体数量相对较少,优势可能被掩盖。

相似文献

1
Outcomes post-discharge from an early intervention in psychosis service.精神病早期干预服务出院后的结果。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;6(4):465-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2012.00349.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
2
Service-users' experiences of an early intervention in psychosis service: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.服务使用者对早期精神病干预服务的体验:一种阐释现象学分析。
Psychol Psychother. 2012 Dec;85(4):456-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02043.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
3
An exploration of what service users value about early intervention in psychosis services.对服务使用者认为精神病早期干预服务有价值之处的探索。
Psychol Psychother. 2015 Dec;88(4):468-80. doi: 10.1111/papt.12051. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
4
A descriptive study of 'non-cases' and referral rates to an early intervention for psychosis service.非病例描述性研究及向精神病早期干预服务转诊率。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;6(3):276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00328.x. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Discharges from an early intervention in psychosis service: where do patients stand after 3 years?精神病早期干预服务的出院情况:3年后患者的状况如何?
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;9(1):48-52. doi: 10.1111/eip.12148. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
6
Economic impact of early intervention in psychosis services: results from a longitudinal retrospective controlled study in England.早期干预精神病服务的经济影响:来自英国一项纵向回顾性对照研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 20;6(10):e012611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012611.
7
Implementing the access and waiting time standard for early intervention in psychosis in the United Kingdom: An evaluation of referrals and post-assessment outcomes over the first year of operation.在英国实施精神病早期干预的就诊及等待时间标准:对运营第一年转诊及评估后结果的评估
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):979-986. doi: 10.1111/eip.12548. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
8
Initial predictors of outcome in an early intervention in psychosis service.首发精神病早期干预服务结局的预测因子。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;7(3):311-4. doi: 10.1111/eip.12028. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
9
Does early intervention for psychosis work? An analysis of outcomes of early intervention in psychosis based on the critical period hypothesis, measured by number of admissions and bed days used over a period of six years, the first three in an early intervention service, the second three in a community mental health team.早期精神病干预是否有效?根据关键期假说,通过对 6 年内的入院次数和住院天数进行分析,对早期精神病干预的结果进行评估,前 3 年在早期干预服务中,后 3 年在社区心理健康团队中。
Psychiatr Danub. 2010 Nov;22 Suppl 1:S72-84.
10
The Somerset team for early psychosis.萨默塞特早期精神病学团队。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;3(3):231-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2009.00138.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Rates of Inpatient and Emergency Room Use Before and After Discharge Among Medicaid Enrollees in OnTrackNY.在 TrackNY 项目中,医疗补助计划参保者在出院前后的住院和急诊室使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Nov 1;72(11):1328-1331. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000791. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Defining disengagement from mental health services for individuals experiencing first episode psychosis: a systematic review.定义首次出现精神病症状的个体脱离心理健康服务:系统综述。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01750-6. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
3
Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services.
精神病早期干预服务治疗后的出院途径及复发情况。
BJPsych Open. 2018 Aug 30;4(5):368-374. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.50. eCollection 2018 Sep.