Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Neurosurgery. 2012 Jul;71(1):80-5. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182517aa1.
The Rotterdam computed tomography (CT) score was developed for prognostic purposes in traumatic brain injury (TBI).
To examine the prognostic discrimination and prediction of the Rotterdam CT score in the case of patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy (DC) for TBI.
The CT scans with the worst findings before DC were scored according to the Rotterdam CT classification. Mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale score at the end of follow-up were used as outcome measures. Unfavorable and favorable outcomes were defined by a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 1 to 3 and 4 to 5, respectively. We used binary logistic and proportional odds regression for prognostic analyses.
The relationship between the Rotterdam CT score and prognosis was quantified, and higher scores indicated worse patient outcomes. Univariate analysis showed that the Rotterdam CT score was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio: 3.117, 95% confidence interval: 1.867-5.386; P < .001) and unfavorable outcomes (odds ratio: 2.612, 95% confidence interval: 1.733-3.939; P < .001). After adjustment for published outcome predictors of TBI in multivariate regression, the Rotterdam CT score remained an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (odds ratio: 1.830, 95% confidence interval: 1.043-3.212; P = .035).
For head-injured patients undergoing DC, the Rotterdam CT score provides great prognostic discrimination and is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. We suggest that the Rotterdam CT score be included as a prognosticator in the overall assessment of clinical condition of TBI patients before DC.
鹿特丹计算机断层扫描(CT)评分是为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的预后目的而开发的。
检查 Rotterdam CT 评分在 TBI 患者行去骨瓣减压术(DC)时的预后区分度和预测能力。
根据 Rotterdam CT 分类对 DC 前最差 CT 发现进行评分。死亡率和随访结束时的格拉斯哥结局量表评分(GOS)用作结局指标。通过格拉斯哥结局量表评分(GOS)将不良和良好结局定义为 1 到 3 分和 4 到 5 分。我们使用二元逻辑回归和比例优势比回归进行预后分析。
量化了 Rotterdam CT 评分与预后之间的关系,较高的评分表明患者的结局较差。单因素分析表明,Rotterdam CT 评分与死亡率(优势比:3.117,95%置信区间:1.867-5.386;P<0.001)和不良结局(优势比:2.612,95%置信区间:1.733-3.939;P<0.001)显著相关。在多变量回归中调整 TBI 的已发表结局预测因素后,Rotterdam CT 评分仍然是不良结局的独立预测因子(优势比:1.830,95%置信区间:1.043-3.212;P=0.035)。
对于行 DC 的头部受伤患者,Rotterdam CT 评分具有良好的预后区分度,是不良结局的独立预测因子。我们建议在 TBI 患者行 DC 前的整体临床状况评估中,将 Rotterdam CT 评分纳入预后预测因子。