• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国神经创伤数据库系统介绍及第二个项目成果报告

Introduction to the Korean Neurotrauma Data Bank System and Report on the Results of the Second Project.

作者信息

Kim Ji-Na, Eom Ki Seong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and pain medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Iksan, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Jan;68(1):25-36. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0156. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

DOI:10.3340/jkns.2024.0156
PMID:39662961
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725463/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2006, the Korean Neurotraumatology Society (KNTS) established the 1st Korean Neurotrauma Data Bank Committee (KNTDBC) and developed the Korean Neurotrauma Data Bank System (KNTDBS). Full-scale registration of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient data began in September 2010. Since then, KNTS has conducted two trauma-related data registration projects and is now in its 5th term of the KNTDBC. This study aimed to introduce the KNTDBS of the KNTS and report the results of the second project.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and June 2021, 1109 TBI patients were registered from 18 hospitals. The inclusion criteria were 1) patients who visited the hospital with TBI, 2) patients with severe TBI with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of 8 or lower, and 3) adult patients aged 19 years or older. Exclusion criteria were 1) patients under 18 years of age, 2) patients with a GCS score of 9 or higher, and 3) patients with a history of previous craniotomy or craniectomy. Data from the second project were registered into seven major categories : patient registration, neuroimaging, neuromonitoring, hypothermia, surgical treatment, medical treatment, and patient evaluation.

RESULTS

The characteristics of TBI patients in this study were not significantly different from those in previous studies, including the 1st project of KNTS. The GCS had a large number of severe patients with scores of 3 and 4, which was associated with the highest proportion of patients having bilateral pupils with unrecordable responses. Most TBI patients had severe or critical injuries (score 4 or 5) concentrated in the Abbreviated incentive scale head but had minor injuries to other regions of the body. Rotterdam computed tomography scores of 5 and 6 primarily indicated acute subdural hematomas. Surgical treatment was performed in 36.2% of all TBI cases. Most hospitals used levetiracetam and valproate as prophylactic antiepileptic drugs. Neuromonitoring, hypothermia, and coma therapy were not actively performed. The overall mortality rate was 33.3%, and among 740 survivors, 3.9% underwent shunt surgery.

CONCLUSION

The creation of a database for TBI patient data facilitated the collection of objective and valid information on trauma. Utilizing data from the KNTDBS will significantly aid in the treatment and prevention of TBI and contribute to the improvement of healthcare in the country.

摘要

目的

2006年,韩国神经创伤学会(KNTS)成立了首届韩国神经创伤数据库委员会(KNTDBC),并开发了韩国神经创伤数据库系统(KNTDBS)。创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者数据的全面登记于2010年9月开始。从那时起,KNTS开展了两个与创伤相关的数据登记项目,目前正处于KNTDBC的第五个任期。本研究旨在介绍KNTS的KNTDBS并报告第二个项目的结果。

方法

2018年1月至2021年6月,18家医院登记了1109例TBI患者。纳入标准为:1)因TBI到医院就诊的患者;2)格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8分的重度TBI患者;3)年龄≥19岁的成年患者。排除标准为:1)年龄<18岁的患者;2)GCS评分≥9分的患者;3)既往有开颅手术或颅骨切除术史的患者。第二个项目的数据登记分为七个主要类别:患者登记、神经影像学、神经监测、低温治疗、手术治疗、药物治疗和患者评估。

结果

本研究中TBI患者的特征与以往研究(包括KNTS的第一个项目)中的患者特征无显著差异。GCS评分3分和4分的重度患者数量较多,这与双侧瞳孔反应无法记录的患者比例最高相关。大多数TBI患者有严重或危急损伤(评分4或5),集中在简明损伤定级标准头部,但身体其他部位损伤较轻。鹿特丹计算机断层扫描评分5分和6分主要提示急性硬膜下血肿。36.2%的TBI病例接受了手术治疗。大多数医院使用左乙拉西坦和丙戊酸盐作为预防性抗癫痫药物。神经监测、低温治疗和昏迷治疗未积极开展。总死亡率为33.3%,在740名幸存者中,3.9%接受了分流手术。

结论

创建TBI患者数据库有助于收集关于创伤的客观和有效信息。利用KNTDBS的数据将显著有助于TBI的治疗和预防,并有助于该国医疗保健的改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/28683dadb822/jkns-2024-0156f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/8039ee366ed9/jkns-2024-0156f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/91952650546b/jkns-2024-0156f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/49689e008470/jkns-2024-0156f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/08b01b04dde0/jkns-2024-0156f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/28683dadb822/jkns-2024-0156f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/8039ee366ed9/jkns-2024-0156f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/91952650546b/jkns-2024-0156f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/49689e008470/jkns-2024-0156f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/08b01b04dde0/jkns-2024-0156f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cc6/11725463/28683dadb822/jkns-2024-0156f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Introduction to the Korean Neurotrauma Data Bank System and Report on the Results of the Second Project.韩国神经创伤数据库系统介绍及第二个项目成果报告
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2025 Jan;68(1):25-36. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2024.0156. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Population : A Multicenter Analysis Using Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System 2010-2014.老年人群创伤性脑损伤的流行病学与转归:基于韩国神经创伤数据库系统2010 - 2014年的多中心分析
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Mar;62(2):243-255. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0017. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Therapeutic temperature modulation in severe or moderate traumatic brain injury: a propensity score analysis of data from the Nationwide Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.重度或中度创伤性脑损伤中的治疗性温度调节:来自日本全国神经创伤数据库数据的倾向评分分析
J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):527-37. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.JNS141895. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Analysis of Mortality and Epidemiology in 2617 Cases of Traumatic Brain Injury : Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System 2010-2014.2617例创伤性脑损伤的死亡率及流行病学分析:韩国神经创伤数据库系统(2010 - 2014年)
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Sep;59(5):485-91. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.485. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
5
Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷评分和瞳孔参数对儿童和成人严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和预后的影响:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):760-767. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
6
Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils score for predicting inpatient mortality among patients with traumatic subdural hematoma at United States trauma centers.评估美国创伤中心创伤性硬脑膜下血肿患者格拉斯哥昏迷量表瞳孔评分对内伤住院患者死亡率的预测价值。
J Neurosurg. 2024 May 3;141(4):908-916. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.JNS232695. Print 2024 Oct 1.
7
Comparison of Outcomes at Trauma Centers versus Non-Trauma Centers for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤在创伤中心与非创伤中心的治疗结果比较。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2023 Jan;66(1):63-71. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0163. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Graphical presentation of probabilities.简化创伤性脑损伤预后信息的使用。第 2 部分:概率的图形表示。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;128(6):1621-1634. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172782. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
9
Care pathways and factors associated with interhospital transfer to neurotrauma centers for patients with isolated moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a population-based study from the Norwegian trauma registry.伴有孤立性中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的院间神经创伤中心转院的路径和相关因素:来自挪威创伤登记处的一项基于人群的研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 26;31(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01097-7.
10
Outcome and surgical management for geriatric traumatic brain injury: analysis of 888 cases registered in the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank.老年创伤性脑损伤的结局与外科治疗:对日本神经创伤数据库中888例病例的分析
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview.《格拉斯哥结局量表-扩展访谈手册》
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Sep 1;38(17):2435-2446. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7527. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
2
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Population : A Multicenter Analysis Using Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System 2010-2014.老年人群创伤性脑损伤的流行病学与转归:基于韩国神经创伤数据库系统2010 - 2014年的多中心分析
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Mar;62(2):243-255. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0017. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Prognostic significance of abnormal hematological parameters in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.
需要去骨瓣减压术的严重创伤性脑损伤患者血液学参数异常的预后意义。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(2):545-551. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS182293. Print 2020 Feb 1.
4
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.《重型颅脑损伤管理指南(第四版)》
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
5
Analysis of Mortality and Epidemiology in 2617 Cases of Traumatic Brain Injury : Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System 2010-2014.2617例创伤性脑损伤的死亡率及流行病学分析:韩国神经创伤数据库系统(2010 - 2014年)
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Sep;59(5):485-91. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.485. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
6
Clinical Analysis of Results of Shunt Operation for Hydrocephalus Following Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤后脑积水分流手术结果的临床分析
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2015 Oct;11(2):58-62. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.58. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
7
Rotterdam computed tomography score as a prognosticator in head-injured patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy.颅脑损伤患者行去骨瓣减压术后的 Rotterdam CT 评分与预后的关系。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Jul;71(1):80-5. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182517aa1.
8
Fixed, dilated pupils following traumatic brain injury: historical perspectives, causes and ophthalmological sequelae.创伤性脑损伤后瞳孔固定、散大:历史观点、病因及眼科后遗症
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:295-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0956-4_57.
9
Final report of the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank project 1998-2001: 1,002 cases of traumatic brain injury.日本神经创伤数据库项目1998 - 2001年最终报告:1002例创伤性脑损伤病例。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006 Dec;46(12):567-74. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.567.
10
Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors.利用计算机断层扫描特征预测创伤性脑损伤的预后:计算机断层扫描分类与计算机断层扫描预测指标组合之间的比较
Neurosurgery. 2005 Dec;57(6):1173-82; discussion 1173-82. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000186013.63046.6b.