Eghlimi B, Schaaf H, Hesse G
Baumrainklinik, Helios-Rehazentrum Bad Berleburg, Lerchenweg 8, 57319, Bad Berleburg, Deutschland.
HNO. 2012 Apr;60(4):330-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2419-4.
Assessing otolithic functions in the case of vertigo, although significant, is challenging from a practical point of view. A tilt of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a very sensitive sign of vestibular tonus imbalance in the roll plane. The standard method, a light bar in the dark, requires expensive, stationary equipment. However, portable equipment has been developed. The patient, who is in complete darkness afforded by a cover, sits in front of a monitor that can be seen by him and the examiner. Results obtained with this system were validated and compared with the standard application.
Measurements were taken in 100 unselected, consecutive patients suffering from dizziness treated at the Baumrain Klinik, Bad Berleburg as well as in 26 healthy volunteers. All were examined and diagnosed by an ENT physician. Measurements in all participants were taken first with the standard procedure (equipment Vertitest) followed by the portable procedure (Vertistar equipment). In each case the deviation of the absolute from the true vertical was measured and the mean differences between the two procedures calculated. These were then analyzed using a paired t-test with the help of the SPSS system.
Comparative measurements in the dizziness group (n = 100), t(25) = 0.868, p = 0.394 and in the healthy control group (n = 26), t(99) = -0.192, p = 0.848 showed no significant differences in the distribution of SVV values while using the stationary or the portable version. Inter-test reliability was significantly positive (r = 0.852; p < 0.01, n = 126).
The portable method for measuring SVV is practical, flexible and cost-effective and demonstrates the same diagnostic accuracy as the stationary method.
在眩晕病例中评估耳石功能虽然很重要,但从实际角度来看具有挑战性。主观视觉垂直(SVV)的倾斜是横滚平面前庭张力失衡的一个非常敏感的指标。标准方法是在黑暗中使用光条,需要昂贵的固定设备。然而,便携式设备已经研发出来。患者坐在一个由遮盖物营造出完全黑暗环境的地方,面前是一个他和检查者都能看到的显示器。用该系统获得的结果经过了验证,并与标准应用进行了比较。
对在巴特贝雷堡的鲍姆兰诊所接受治疗的100例未经挑选的连续头晕患者以及26名健康志愿者进行了测量。所有患者均由耳鼻喉科医生进行检查和诊断。所有参与者首先采用标准程序(Vertitest设备)进行测量,然后采用便携式程序(Vertistar设备)进行测量。在每种情况下,测量绝对垂直与真实垂直的偏差,并计算两种程序之间的平均差异。然后借助SPSS系统使用配对t检验对这些差异进行分析。
头晕组(n = 100)的比较测量结果,t(25) = 0.868,p = 0.394;健康对照组(n = 26)的比较测量结果,t(99) = -0.192,p = 0.848,表明使用固定版本或便携式版本时,SVV值的分布没有显著差异。测试间可靠性显著为正(r = 0.852;p < 0.01,n = 126)。
测量SVV的便携式方法实用、灵活且具有成本效益,并且与固定方法具有相同的诊断准确性。