Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Hum Biol. 2012 May-Jun;24(3):261-76. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22253. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
The global obesity epidemic remains poorly understood, partly because it has emerged alongside persisting under-nutrition in many populations. At an abstract level, obesity develops from exposure to the "obesogenic niche," comprising diverse factors predisposing to weight gain. This article first explores how susceptibility to the obesogenic niche is influenced by developmental and life-history experience. Human growth is sensitive to early-life ecological conditions, under the transducing effect of maternal phenotype. Such plasticity is associated with subsequent variability in body composition and metabolism, impacting susceptibility to the obesogenic niche, albeit with heterogeneity across populations. Both nutritional constraint and nutritional excess during early life are associated with variability in relevant molecular pathways. The article then considers the fundamental contribution of capitalist economics to population under-nutrition and over-nutrition. Historically, capitalism contributed to the under-nutrition of many populations through demand for cheap labor. As the limiting factor for economic growth switched to consumption, capitalism has increasingly driven consumer behavior inducing widespread over-nutrition. In populations undergoing nutritional transition, many individuals encounter both under- and over-nutrition within the life course, elevating both susceptibility and exposure to the obesogenic niche. The interactions between global economic forces and nutritional shifts are distributed across generations, and are strongly transduced by maternal effects. The structural connections between undernourished and overnourished worldwide and between under- and over-nutrition within individual life-courses highlight the central role of capitalist economics in the global obesity epidemic. Prevention policies targeting individual behavior have proved ineffective and economic policies are arguably the optimal target for intervention.
全球肥胖症流行仍未得到充分理解,部分原因是它与许多人群中持续存在的营养不足同时出现。从抽象层面来看,肥胖是由暴露于“致肥胖环境”引起的,其中包括多种导致体重增加的因素。本文首先探讨了易感性如何受到发育和生活史经历的影响。人类的生长对母亲表型的转录效应下的早期生态条件敏感。这种可塑性与随后的身体成分和代谢变化有关,影响到易感性,但在不同人群中存在异质性。早期的营养限制和营养过剩都与相关分子途径的变异性有关。然后,文章考虑了资本主义经济学对人口营养不足和营养过剩的根本贡献。从历史上看,资本主义通过对廉价劳动力的需求导致了许多人群的营养不足。随着经济增长的限制因素转变为消费,资本主义越来越多地推动消费者行为,导致广泛的营养过剩。在经历营养转型的人群中,许多人在整个生命周期中都经历了营养不足和营养过剩,这增加了他们对致肥胖环境的易感性和暴露率。全球经济力量和营养变化之间的相互作用在代际间分布,并受到母体效应的强烈转录。全世界营养不足和营养过剩之间以及个体生命历程中营养不足和营养过剩之间的结构性联系突出了资本主义经济学在全球肥胖症流行中的核心作用。针对个体行为的预防政策已被证明无效,经济政策可以说是干预的最佳目标。