Department of Human Development and Family Studies, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Mar;36(1):42-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00118.2011.
The purpose of this study was to investigate students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science in two different forms: internet-assisted instruction and traditional (face-to-face only) instruction. The participants who took part in the study were 79 college students enrolled in a physiology class in north Taiwan. In all, 46 of the participants were from one class and 33 were from another class. Using a quasi-experimental research approach, the class of 46 students was assigned to be the "internet-assisted instruction group," whereas the class of 33 students was assigned to be the "traditional instruction group." The treatment consisted of a series of online inquiry activities. To explore the effects of different forms of instruction on students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science, two questionnaires were administered before and after the instruction: the Conceptions of Learning Science Questionnaire and the Approaches to Learning Science Questionnaire. Analysis of covariance results revealed that the students in the internet-assisted instruction group showed less agreement than the traditional instruction group in the less advanced conceptions of learning science (such as learning as memorizing and testing). In addition, the internet-assisted instruction group displayed significantly more agreement than the traditional instruction group in more sophisticated conceptions (such as learning as seeing in a new way). Moreover, the internet-assisted instruction group expressed more orientation toward the approaches of deep motive and deep strategy than the traditional instruction group. However, the students in the internet-assisted instruction group also showed more surface motive than the traditional instruction group did.
本研究旨在探讨两种不同教学形式(网络辅助教学和传统教学)下学生对科学的概念理解和学习方法。参与研究的是台湾北部一所大学生理学课程的 79 名学生。其中,共有 46 名学生来自一个班级,33 名学生来自另一个班级。采用准实验研究方法,将 46 名学生的班级分配为“网络辅助教学组”,而 33 名学生的班级分配为“传统教学组”。该治疗包括一系列在线探究活动。为了探究不同教学形式对学生对科学的概念理解和学习方法的影响,在教学前后使用了两份问卷:《科学学习概念问卷》和《科学学习方法问卷》。协方差分析结果表明,网络辅助教学组在科学学习的概念理解上(如学习就是记忆和测试)比传统教学组的认同度更低。此外,网络辅助教学组在更复杂的概念(如以新的方式看待学习)上的认同度明显高于传统教学组。而且,网络辅助教学组比传统教学组更倾向于采用深层动机和深层策略的学习方法。然而,网络辅助教学组的学生比传统教学组的学生表现出更多的表面动机。