Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Mar;36(1):54-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00050.2011.
Medical students following a traditional curriculum get few opportunities to engage in activities such as a literature search, scientific writing, and active and collaborative learning. An analytical essay writing activity (AEWA) in physiology was introduced to first-year students. Each student prepared an essay incorporating new research findings with existing knowledge on a medical topic. Students were expected to study on the topic in detail from textbooks as well as from research publications and write a descriptive and critical analysis. This activity would help them to be aware of new developments in the field and understand the complexity and rapidity of changes in the subject. The aim of this study was to learn how students used the AEWA as a learning process. For this purpose, student perceptions were assessed quantitatively and those of the faculty staff were assessed qualitatively. The data from the students showed considerable achievements in the medical database search, scientific writing, group work, and search for new scientific knowledge. The activity was influenced by prior capabilities in computer use, English language knowledge, and writing ability. Resources available at the medical school had a greater influence on the activity. Faculty staff appreciated the quality of the essay while highlighting areas of improvement. The students seemed to be satisfied with the supervisory role of the faculty staff, whereas the staff felt that the students used the supervisors less than expected. The AEWA was a successful activity promoting many aspects of active and collaborative learning. The low availability of books and information and communications technology (ICT) resources, poor internet connection, and insufficient English language skills were probably responsible for the negative feedback on this activity in this resource-deprived environment.
医学生在传统课程中很少有机会参与文献检索、科学写作和主动协作学习等活动。我们向一年级学生介绍了一种生理学分析论文写作活动(AEWA)。每个学生都要准备一篇论文,将新的研究发现与医学主题的现有知识结合起来。学生需要从教材以及研究出版物中详细研究该主题,并撰写描述性和批判性分析。这一活动可以帮助学生了解该领域的新发展,理解该主题的复杂性和快速变化。本研究旨在了解学生如何将 AEWA 作为一种学习过程。为此,我们从定量和定性两个方面评估了学生和教职员工的看法。学生的数据显示,他们在医学数据库搜索、科学写作、小组工作和寻找新的科学知识方面取得了相当大的成就。活动受到计算机使用能力、英语语言知识和写作能力等先前能力的影响。医学院的可用资源对活动的影响更大。教职员工赞赏论文的质量,同时强调了需要改进的地方。学生们似乎对教职员工的监督作用感到满意,而教职员工则认为学生的使用监督力度低于预期。AEWA 是一项成功的活动,促进了主动协作学习的许多方面。在资源匮乏的环境中,书籍和信息通信技术(ICT)资源的可用性低、网络连接差以及英语语言技能不足,可能是导致对该活动的负面反馈的原因。