Suppr超能文献

利用支架式教学法和刻意练习提高生物学入门实验课程中的摘要写作能力

Using Scaffolding and Deliberate Practice to Improve Abstract Writing in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Course.

作者信息

Christian Natalie, Kearns Katherine D

机构信息

Evolution, Ecology and Behavior Program, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.

Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.

出版信息

J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Aug 31;19(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1564. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

s play the pivotal role of selling an article to a prospective reader, and for students, the ability to communicate science in concise written form may foster scientific thinking. However, students struggle with abstract composition, and we lack evidence-based educational innovations to help them develop this skill. We designed, implemented, and assessed an intervention for abstract composition with elements of scaffolding and transparency to ask whether deliberate practice improves concise scientific writing in early career undergraduate biology majors. We evaluated student performance by analyzing abstracts written before and after the intervention and by assessing pre- and posttest student concept maps. We found that scaffolded learning improved student abstract writing, with the greatest gains in students' ability to describe the motivation for their work. Using a set of tested tools to teach scientific writing has important implications for strengthening students' capacity to reinforce and synthesize content in the future, whether that is in laboratory course exercises, in independent research, or as a transferable skill to general critical thinking.

摘要

摘要在向潜在读者推销一篇文章方面起着关键作用,对于学生而言,以简洁书面形式交流科学知识的能力可能会促进科学思维。然而,学生在撰写摘要时遇到困难,而且我们缺乏基于证据的教育创新方法来帮助他们培养这项技能。我们设计、实施并评估了一项针对摘要撰写的干预措施,该措施具有支架式教学和透明度的元素,以探究刻意练习是否能提高本科生物专业低年级学生简洁的科学写作能力。我们通过分析干预前后撰写的摘要以及评估学生的课前和课后概念图来评估学生的表现。我们发现支架式学习提高了学生的摘要写作能力,其中学生描述其研究动机的能力提升最为显著。使用一套经过测试的工具来教授科学写作对于增强学生未来强化和综合内容的能力具有重要意义,无论是在实验室课程练习中、独立研究中,还是作为一种可迁移到一般批判性思维的技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef26/6113659/6dc654349259/jmbe-19-83f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Scaffolding and Deliberate Practice to Improve Abstract Writing in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Course.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Aug 31;19(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1564. eCollection 2018.
2
When Do Students "Learn-to-Comprehend" Scientific Sources?: Evaluation of a Critical Skill in Undergraduates Progressing through a Science Major.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2015 May 1;16(1):13-20. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.828. eCollection 2015 May.
3
Increased Scaffolding and Inquiry in an Introductory Biology Lab Enhance Experimental Design Skills and Sense of Scientific Ability.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020 Jul 31;21(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i2.2143. eCollection 2020.
6
An Off-Line Scaffolding Tool for Writing Abstracts of Qualification Papers.
Procedia Comput Sci. 2020;176:1271-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.136. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
An Equity-Focused Redesign of an Introductory Organismal Biology Lab Course To Develop Foundational Scientific Practices.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Jan 9;24(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00213-22. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Mar 15;13(2):A101-9. eCollection 2015 Spring.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Low-Stakes Assignments To Support Scientific Lab Report Writing in Introductory Science Courses.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020 Dec 21;21(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i3.2183. eCollection 2020.
2
Scaffolding Activities Increase Performance and Lower Frustration with Genotype-to-Evolution Models in Molecular Genetics.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2020 Nov 12;21(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i3.2033. eCollection 2020.
3
An Off-Line Scaffolding Tool for Writing Abstracts of Qualification Papers.
Procedia Comput Sci. 2020;176:1271-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.136. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A deliberate practice approach to teaching phylogenetic analysis.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):676-86. doi: 10.1187/cbe-13-03-0046.
2
Writing a research abstract: eloquence in miniature.
Int Angiol. 2012 Jun;31(3):297-302.
4
Analytical essay writing: a new activity introduced to a traditional curriculum.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Mar;36(1):54-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00050.2011.
5
Lab course goals: science or writing?
Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):524; author reply 524. doi: 10.1126/science.333.6042.524-a.
6
Science education. Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course.
Science. 2011 May 20;332(6032):919-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1200353.
7
Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):140-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-11-0203.
8
Writing good abstracts.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(4):256-9. doi: 10.1159/000098324. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
9
Learning biology through research papers: a stimulus for question-asking by high-school students.
Cell Biol Educ. 2003 Winter;2(4):266-74. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-12-0062.
10
Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2001 Dec;25(1-4):167-75. doi: 10.1152/advances.2001.25.3.167.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验