Suppr超能文献

国家背景是否重要?欧洲国家间性别和休闲时间体力活动不足的比较分析。

Does country-context matter? A cross-national analysis of gender and leisure time physical inactivity in Europe.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2013 Jun;23(3):452-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks009. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well known that European women are less physically active in their leisure time than European men. Attempts to explain this gender difference often do not succeed in raising the problem above the individual level. However, the size of the disadvantage for women varies considerably across countries, proving that leisure time physical (in)activity takes place in a broader societal context and must also be approached as such. In this sense, some authors have explained women's lack of leisure time physical activity in terms of gendered power relations in society. Therefore, the present article postulates that over and above the individual effect of gender, there is an additional impact of a society's gender-based (in)equality distribution.

METHODS

By means of the 2005 Eurobarometer survey (comprising 25,745 adults from 27 European countries), gender differences in leisure time physical inactivity (LTPI) were analysed by means of multilevel logistic regression analysis. National gender-based (in)equality was measured by the Gender Empowerment Measure and the Gender Gap Index.

RESULTS

Controlled for compositional effects, gender differences in LTPI varied as a function of gender-related characteristics at the macro-level. In particular, in countries characterized by high levels of gender-based equality, LTPI differences between men and women even disappeared.

CONCLUSION

The findings underscore the need to adopt a society-level approach and to incorporate socio-contextual factors in the study of gender disparities in LTPI.

摘要

背景

众所周知,欧洲女性在闲暇时间的身体活动水平低于欧洲男性。试图解释这种性别差异的尝试往往未能将问题提升到个人层面以上。然而,女性在这方面的劣势大小因国家而异,这证明闲暇时间的身体(不)活动发生在更广泛的社会背景中,也必须如此看待。从这个意义上说,一些作者从社会中的性别权力关系方面解释了女性缺乏闲暇时间的身体活动。因此,本文假设,除了个人性别效应之外,还有一个社会性别(不)平等分配的额外影响。

方法

通过 2005 年的欧洲晴雨表调查(涵盖了来自 27 个欧洲国家的 25745 名成年人),本研究采用多层次逻辑回归分析,分析了闲暇时间身体不活动(LTPI)方面的性别差异。国家性别(不)平等通过性别赋权测度和性别差距指数来衡量。

结果

在控制了组成效应后,LTPI 的性别差异随着宏观层面上与性别相关的特征而变化。特别是在性别平等程度较高的国家,男女之间的 LTPI 差异甚至消失了。

结论

这些发现强调了需要采取社会层面的方法,并在研究 LTPI 中的性别差异时纳入社会背景因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验