Department of Nephrology, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Perit Dial Int. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):507-15. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00116. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of oral pioglitazone (PIO) on lipid metabolism, insulin resistance, inflammation, and adipokine metabolism in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.
In this randomized crossover trial, 36 CAPD patients with serum triglyceride levels above 1.8 mmol/L were randomly assigned to receive either oral PIO 15 mg once daily or no PIO for 12 weeks. Then, after a 4-week washout, the patients were switched to the alternative regimen. The primary endpoint was change in serum triglycerides during the PIO regimen compared with no PIO. Secondary endpoints included changes in other lipid levels, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), adipocytokines, and C-reactive protein (CRP).
All 36 CAPD patients (age: 64 ± 11 years; 33% men; 27.8% with diabetes mellitus) completed the study. Comparing patients after PIO and no PIO therapy, we found no significant differences in mean serum triglycerides (3.83 ± 1.49 mmol/L vs 3.51 ± 1.98 mmol/L, p = 0.2). However, mean high-density lipoprotein (0.94 ± 0.22 mmol/L vs 1.00 ± 0.21 mmol/L, p = 0.004) and median total adiponectin [10.34 μg/mL (range: 2.59 - 34.48 μg/mL) vs 30.44 μg/mL (3.47 - 93.41 μg/mL), p < 0.001] increased significantly. Median HOMA-IR [7.51 (1.39 - 45.23) vs 5.38 (0.97 - 14.95), p = 0.006], mean fasting blood glucose (7.31 ± 2.57 mmol/L vs 6.60 ± 2.45 mmol/L, p = 0.01), median CRP [8.78 mg/L (0.18 - 53 mg/L) vs 3.50 mg/L (0.17 - 26.30 mg/L), p = 0.005], and mean resistin (32.70 ± 17.17 ng/mL vs 28.79 ± 11.83 ng/mL, p = 0.02) all declined. The PIO was well tolerated, with only one adverse event: lower-extremity edema in a patient with low residual renal function.
Blood triglycerides were not altered after 12 weeks of PIO 15 mg once daily in CAPD patients, but parameters of dysmetabolism were markedly improved, including insulin resistance, inflammation, and adipokine balance, suggesting that PIO could be of value for this high-risk patient group. Larger, more definitive studies are needed to confirm these findings.
本研究旨在探讨口服吡格列酮(PIO)对持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者脂代谢、胰岛素抵抗、炎症和脂肪因子代谢的影响。
在这项随机交叉试验中,36 名血清甘油三酯水平高于 1.8mmol/L 的 CAPD 患者被随机分为接受口服 PIO 15mg 每日一次或不接受 PIO 治疗 12 周。然后,经过 4 周的洗脱期后,患者切换至另一种治疗方案。主要终点是 PIO 治疗与不接受 PIO 治疗相比血清甘油三酯的变化。次要终点包括其他血脂水平、稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)、脂肪细胞因子和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的变化。
所有 36 名 CAPD 患者(年龄:64±11 岁;33%为男性;27.8%患有糖尿病)完成了研究。与接受 PIO 和不接受 PIO 治疗的患者相比,我们发现平均血清甘油三酯无显著差异(3.83±1.49mmol/L 与 3.51±1.98mmol/L,p=0.2)。然而,高密度脂蛋白平均值(0.94±0.22mmol/L 与 1.00±0.21mmol/L,p=0.004)和中位总脂联素[10.34μg/mL(范围:2.59-34.48μg/mL)与 30.44μg/mL(3.47-93.41μg/mL),p<0.001]显著增加。中位 HOMA-IR[7.51(1.39-45.23)与 5.38(0.97-14.95),p=0.006]、空腹血糖平均值(7.31±2.57mmol/L 与 6.60±2.45mmol/L,p=0.01)、中位 CRP[8.78mg/L(0.18-53mg/L)与 3.50mg/L(0.17-26.30mg/L),p=0.005]和平均抵抗素(32.70±17.17ng/mL 与 28.79±11.83ng/mL,p=0.02)均下降。PIO 耐受性良好,仅有 1 例不良事件:低残余肾功能患者下肢水肿。
在 CAPD 患者中,每日口服 PIO 15mg 治疗 12 周后,血甘油三酯没有改变,但代谢紊乱的参数明显改善,包括胰岛素抵抗、炎症和脂肪因子平衡,这表明 PIO 可能对这一高危患者群体有价值。需要更大、更明确的研究来证实这些发现。