• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高医学生的神经系统检查技能。

Improving the neurological exam skills of medical students.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Medicine, Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Neurol Sci. 2012 Jan;39(1):83-6. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100012749.

DOI:10.1017/s0317167100012749
PMID:22384501
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine if distributed practice of of neurological exam (NE) skills in first year medical school produces sustained improvements in the skills of second year students.

METHODS

A prospective, controlled, non-blinded study conducted at McGill University (class size = 180 students). Expanded teaching of muscle stretch reflexes was provided to first year medical students. A structured examination of muscle stretch reflexes (max score = 100) was administered in second year medical school after a required two week rotation in Neurology. Results for class A (received the intervention in first year) were compared to the results for the preceding class B (had not received the intervention).

RESULTS

77 of 177 (44%) eligible in class A and 69 of 166 (42%) eligible students in class B participated. Results were analyzed separately for each of the two examiners. Mean (SD) scores were 95.2 (5.6) for class A (intervention) and 81.7 (11.1) for class B (control) for the first examiner and 90.4 (8.2) for class A and 83.8 (11.7) for class B for the second examiner. Results were statistically significant (Mann-Whitney test z = 5.27, p<0.0001 first examiner and z = 2.67, p<0.0038 second examiner).

CONCLUSIONS

Distributed practice of muscle stretch reflexes during first year medical school results in improved performance by second year medical students after their mandatory clinical rotation in neurology, even when examined up to 14 months after the intervention. This finding has implications for the teaching of the NE.

摘要

目的

确定在医学生第一年中进行神经检查(NE)技能的分布式实践是否会持续提高第二年学生的技能。

方法

在麦吉尔大学(班级规模= 180 名学生)进行了一项前瞻性、对照、非盲研究。为第一年医学生提供了肌肉拉伸反射的扩展教学。在神经科必修两周轮转后,在第二年医学院进行了结构化的肌肉拉伸反射检查(满分为 100 分)。结果与前一班 B(未接受干预)进行了比较。

结果

在 A 班(在第一年接受了干预)中,有 77 名/177 名(44%)符合条件的学生和 B 班(未接受干预)中 69 名/166 名(42%)符合条件的学生参加了考试。分别分析了两位考官的考试结果。对于第一位考官,A 班(干预)的平均(SD)分数为 95.2(5.6),B 班(对照)的平均分数为 81.7(11.1);对于第二位考官,A 班的平均分数为 90.4(8.2),B 班的平均分数为 83.8(11.7)。结果具有统计学意义(Mann-Whitney 检验 z = 5.27,p <0.0001 位考官和 z = 2.67,p <0.0038 第二位考官)。

结论

在医学生第一年中进行肌肉拉伸反射的分布式实践,在他们强制性的神经科临床轮转后,会提高第二年医学生的表现,即使在干预后长达 14 个月进行检查也是如此。这一发现对 NE 的教学有影响。

相似文献

1
Improving the neurological exam skills of medical students.提高医学生的神经系统检查技能。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2012 Jan;39(1):83-6. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100012749.
2
An intervention to teach medical students ankle reflex examination skills.一项教授医学生踝关节反射检查技能的干预措施。
Neurologist. 2010 May;16(3):196-8. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181a0ae38.
3
Standardized patient outcomes trial (SPOT) in neurology.神经病学中的标准化患者结局试验(SPOT)。
Med Educ Online. 2011 Jan 14;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.5634.
4
The impact of formal instruction in clinical examination skills on medical student performance -- the example of peripheral nervous system examination.临床检查技能的正规教学对医学生表现的影响——以周围神经系统检查为例。
Med Educ. 2001 Apr;35(4):371-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00732.x.
5
[Acquisition of clinical observation skills by medical students improves with discipline-based teaching. The example of neurological examination].[医学生通过基于学科的教学,临床观察技能的获得有所提高。以神经学检查为例]
Rev Med Interne. 2018 Dec;39(12):905-911. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
6
Miming neurological syndromes improves medical student's long-term retention and delayed recall of neurology.模拟神经系统疾病可提高医学生对神经病学的长期保留和延迟回忆。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Aug 15;391:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
7
The essential neurologic examination: what should medical students be taught?基本神经学检查:医学生应该学些什么?
Neurology. 2009 Jun 9;72(23):2020-3. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a92be6.
8
Comparing students' feedback about clinical instruction with their performances.比较学生对临床教学的反馈与其表现。
Acad Med. 1991 Jan;66(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199101000-00009.
9
Attitudes and performance of third- vs fourth-year neurology clerkship students.三年级与四年级神经科实习学生的态度与表现
Arch Neurol. 2010 May;67(5):548-51. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.64.
10
Is there a role for GPs in teaching neurology to medical students? A qualitative evaluation.全科医生在向医学生教授神经病学方面是否能发挥作用?一项定性评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2019 Mar;30(2):110-116. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1566872. Epub 2019 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Education Research: Comparison of Lecture-Based and Direct Instruction Didactics to Improve Neurologic Examination Confidence in Neurology Clerkship Students.教育研究:基于讲座式教学法与直接指导教学法对提高神经病学实习学生神经系统检查信心的比较
Neurol Educ. 2025 Aug 26;4(3):e200236. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200236. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Exploring medical student perceptions of a video-modified Peyton's 4-step technique for teaching spinal and neurological examinations.探索医学生对用于教授脊柱和神经检查的视频改良佩顿四步法的看法。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2519391. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2519391. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Neurology Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.
神经病学本科医学教育:一项范围综述
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Mar;32(3):e70061. doi: 10.1111/ene.70061.
4
Systematic review of distributed practice and retrieval practice in health professions education.系统回顾分布式实践和检索实践在健康职业教育中的应用。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 May;29(2):689-714. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10274-3. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review.概念化健康专业教育中的间隔学习:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2020 Mar;54(3):205-216. doi: 10.1111/medu.14025. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Curing neurophobia in medical schools: evidence-based strategies.治疗医学院校中的神经恐惧症:循证策略
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 27;21:32476. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.32476. eCollection 2016.