Diabetes Center, Endocrinology Division, Department of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo-Immunology Laboratory, Rua Pedro de Toledo 781/12, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2012 Apr;168(1):60-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04538.x.
Several studies correlated genetic background and pancreatic islet-cell autoantibody status (type and number) in type 1A diabetes mellitus (T1AD), but there are no data evaluating the relationship among these markers with serum cytokines, regulatory T cells and β cell function. This characterization has a potential importance with regard to T1AD patients' stratification and follow-up in therapeutic prevention. In this study we showed that peripheral sera cytokines [interleukin (IL)-12, IL-6, II-1β, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-10] and chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL8, CXCL9, CCL2) measured were significantly higher in newly diagnosed T1AD patients when compared to healthy controls (P < 0·001). Among T1AD, we found a positive correlation between CXCL10 and CCL-2 (r = 0·80; P = 0·000), IL-8 and TNF-α (r = 0·60; P = 0·000); IL-8 and IL-12 (r = 0·57; P = 0·001) and TNF-α and IL-12 (r = 0·93; P = 0·000). Glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD-65) autoantibodies (GADA) were associated negatively with CXCL10 (r = -0·45; P = 0·011) and CCL2 (r = -0·65; P = 0·000), while IA-2A showed a negative correlation with IL-10 (r = -0·38; P = 0·027). Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) DR3, DR4 or DR3/DR4 and PTPN22 polymorphism did not show any association with pancreatic islet cell antibodies or cytokines studied. In summary, our results revealed that T1AD have a proinflammatory cytokine profile compared to healthy controls and that IA-2A sera titres seem to be associated with a more inflammatory peripheral cytokine/chemokine profile than GADA. A confirmation of these data in the pre-T1AD phase could help to explain the mechanistic of the well-known role of IA-2A as a more specific marker of beta-cell damage than GADA during the natural history of T1AD.
几项研究将遗传背景与 1 型糖尿病(T1AD)的胰岛细胞自身抗体状态(类型和数量)相关联,但尚无数据评估这些标志物与血清细胞因子、调节性 T 细胞和β细胞功能之间的关系。这一特征对于 T1AD 患者的分层和治疗预防随访具有潜在的重要性。在这项研究中,我们发现与健康对照组相比,新诊断的 T1AD 患者外周血清细胞因子[白细胞介素(IL)-12、IL-6、IL-1β、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、IL-10]和趋化因子(CXCL10、CXCL8、CXCL9、CCL2)显著升高(P<0·001)。在 T1AD 中,我们发现 CXCL10 与 CCL-2 之间存在正相关(r=0·80;P=0·000),IL-8 与 TNF-α之间存在正相关(r=0·60;P=0·000),IL-8 与 IL-12 之间存在正相关(r=0·57;P=0·001),TNF-α与 IL-12 之间存在正相关(r=0·93;P=0·000)。谷氨酸脱羧酶 65(GAD-65)自身抗体(GADA)与 CXCL10(r=-0·45;P=0·011)和 CCL2(r=-0·65;P=0·000)呈负相关,而 IA-2A 与 IL-10 呈负相关(r=-0·38;P=0·027)。人类白细胞抗原(HLA)DR3、DR4 或 DR3/DR4 和 PTPN22 多态性与研究中的胰岛细胞抗体或细胞因子无任何关联。总之,与健康对照组相比,我们的结果显示 T1AD 存在促炎细胞因子谱,而 IA-2A 血清滴度似乎与更具炎症性的外周细胞因子/趋化因子谱相关,而不是 GADA。在 T1AD 前阶段对这些数据的证实可能有助于解释 IA-2A 作为比 GADA 更特异性的β细胞损伤标志物的作用机制,这在 T1AD 的自然史中是众所周知的。