University of Virginia, VA, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
Students who do not get along with their peers are at elevated risk for academic disengagement and school failure. Research has predominantly focused on factors within such children that contribute to their peer problems. This study considers whether teacher practices also predict social preference for children in that classroom. Participants were 26 elementary school teachers and 490 students in their classrooms followed for one school year. Results suggested that teachers who favored the most academically talented students in the fall had classrooms where children had lower average social preference in the spring after statistical control of children's fall social preference and externalizing behavior problems. Teachers who demonstrated emotionally supportive relationships with students in the fall had classrooms where children had greater possibility of changing their social preference from fall to spring. Although children with high externalizing behaviors tended to experience declining social preference over the course of the school year, teachers' learner-centered practices attenuated this progression. However, teachers' favoring of the most academically talented accentuated the negative relation between externalizing behaviors and social preference. Implications for school psychology practitioners are discussed.
与同伴相处不好的学生面临着学业脱节和学校失败的风险。研究主要集中在导致这些孩子同伴问题的内在因素上。本研究考虑了教师的做法是否也能预测课堂上孩子的社交偏好。参与者包括 26 名小学教师和他们课堂上的 490 名学生,这些学生在一学年内进行了跟踪研究。结果表明,在秋季偏爱学业最优秀学生的教师,其课堂在春季的平均社交偏好较低,而秋季学生的社交偏好和外化行为问题则通过统计控制。在秋季与学生建立了情感支持关系的教师,其课堂上的学生更有可能从秋季到春季改变社交偏好。尽管具有高度外化行为的儿童在整个学年中往往会经历社交偏好的下降,但教师以学习者为中心的做法减轻了这种发展趋势。然而,教师对学业最优秀学生的偏爱加剧了外化行为和社交偏好之间的负相关关系。讨论了对学校心理学从业者的启示。