Rubie-Davies Christine M
University of Auckland, Aukland, New Zealand.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Jun;77(Pt 2):289-306. doi: 10.1348/000709906X101601.
Early research exploring teacher expectations concentrated on the dyadic classroom interactions of teachers with individual students. More recent studies have shown whole class factors to have more significance in portraying teachers' expectations. Recently teachers having high or low expectations for all their students have been identified.
The aim of the current investigation was to explore whether the classroom exchanges of high- and low-expectation teachers differed substantially and might be considered a mechanism for teachers' expectations.
The participants were 12 primary school teachers from eight schools who had been identified as having expectations for their students' learning that were either significantly above or below the children's achievement level. The teachers formed three groups called high-expectation, low-expectation and average-progress teachers.
The participants were observed twice in the academic year during half-hour reading lessons. Two people observed each lesson, one completing a structured observation protocol and the other a running record and audiotape.
In contrast to the average progress and low expectation teachers, the high-expectation teachers spent more time providing a framework for students' learning, provided their students with more feedback, questioned their students using more higher-order questions, and managed their students' behaviour more positively.
There appear to be important differences in the classroom environments for the students of high-expectation, average-progress and low-expectation teachers. The differences apply to both the instructional and socioemotional environments of the classroom. Such disparities may act as mechanisms for teacher expectation effects.
早期关于教师期望的研究集中在教师与个别学生的二元课堂互动上。最近的研究表明,全班因素在描绘教师期望方面具有更大的重要性。最近,已经确定了对所有学生期望高或低的教师。
本调查的目的是探讨期望高和期望低的教师在课堂交流上是否存在显著差异,以及这种差异是否可被视为教师期望的一种机制。
参与者是来自八所学校的12名小学教师,他们对学生学习的期望被确定为显著高于或低于学生的成绩水平。这些教师被分成三组,分别称为高期望教师、低期望教师和中等进步教师。
在学年期间,对参与者进行了两次半小时阅读课观察。每次课由两人观察,一人完成结构化观察记录,另一人进行连续记录并录音。
与中等进步教师和低期望教师相比,高期望教师花更多时间为学生的学习提供框架,给学生提供更多反馈,用更多高阶问题提问学生,并更积极地管理学生行为。
对于高期望、中等进步和低期望教师的学生来说,课堂环境似乎存在重要差异。这些差异适用于课堂的教学环境和社会情感环境。这种差异可能是教师期望效应的一种机制。