• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从薄片到凹槽:法国西南部末次冰盛期鹿角加工技术的转变。

From flakes to grooves: a technical shift in antlerworking during the last glacial maximum in southwest France.

机构信息

CNRS, Laboratoire TRACES, Université Toulouse 2, Maison de la Recherche, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2012 Apr;62(4):435-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.12.005
PMID:22386151
Abstract

The evolution of antlerworking technology in Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe, especially the production of splinters, is usually described as a cumulative process. A progressive increase in blank standardization and productivity was prompted by the application of a key technical process, the groove and splinter technique (GST). The Badegoulian, however, appears as an interruption in this continuum. According to the original definition of this post-Solutrean, pre-Magdalenian archeological culture, one of its distinctive features is the absence of the GST and the manufacture of antler blanks by knapping only. However, this conception has been recently questioned, leading to an alternative hypothesis suggesting that both GST and knapping were used during the Badegoulian. In this article, we present new evidence from several sites in southwest France, which sheds new light on the issue of Badegoulian antlerworking and the transition with the subsequent Lower Magdalenian. Our study is based on two complementary methods: the technological analysis of antler assemblages well-dated to the Badegoulian (Le Cuzoul de Vers) or to the Lower Magdalenian (La Grotte des Scilles, Saint-Germain-la-Rivière), and the direct (14)C dating of specific antler artifacts from mixed or problematic contexts (Cap-Blanc, Reverdit and Lassac). The results firmly establish that, in southwest France, knapping is the only method used for the production of antler splinters during the Badegoulian, before ca. 20,500 cal BP (calibrated years before present), and that it is rapidly replaced by the GST at the beginning of the Lower Magdalenian, after ca. 20,500 cal BP. This technical shift is not linked to an influx of new human populations, environmental change or the supposed economic advantages of the GST. Instead, it must be understood as one of the expressions of a broader reconfiguration of the technical world that starts to take shape in the middle of the Last Glacial Maximum.

摘要

旧石器时代和中石器时代欧洲鹿角加工技术的演变,尤其是裂片的制作,通常被描述为一个累积的过程。关键技术工艺——槽与裂片技术(GST)的应用,促使毛坯标准化和生产力逐步提高。然而,巴德高利亚文化却在这个连续体中出现了中断。根据这个后索尔图雷-前马格德林文化的原始定义,其独特特征之一是缺乏 GST,并且只通过敲打法制造鹿角毛坯。然而,这种观念最近受到了质疑,导致了另一种假设,即 GST 和敲打法在巴德高利亚时期都曾被使用。在本文中,我们提出了来自法国西南部几个遗址的新证据,这些证据为巴德高利亚时期的鹿角加工和与随后的下马德林时期的过渡问题提供了新的线索。我们的研究基于两种互补的方法:对年代确定为巴德高利亚时期(Le Cuzoul de Vers)或下马德林时期(La Grotte des Scilles,Saint-Germain-la-Rivière)的鹿角组合进行技术分析,以及对来自混合或有问题背景(Cap-Blanc、Reverdit 和 Lassac)的特定鹿角文物进行直接(14)C 年代测定。结果明确表明,在法国西南部,在大约 20500 年前(校准的距今年前)之前,敲打法是巴德高利亚时期制造鹿角裂片的唯一方法,并且在大约 20500 年前之后,GST 迅速取代了敲打法,进入了下马德林时期。这种技术转变与新人类群体的涌入、环境变化或 GST 的所谓经济优势无关。相反,它必须被理解为始于末次冰盛期中期的技术世界更广泛重组的表现之一。

相似文献

1
From flakes to grooves: a technical shift in antlerworking during the last glacial maximum in southwest France.从薄片到凹槽:法国西南部末次冰盛期鹿角加工技术的转变。
J Hum Evol. 2012 Apr;62(4):435-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
2
Art and the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in Europe: comments on the archaeological arguments for an early Upper Paleolithic antiquity of the Grotte Chauvet art.艺术与欧洲旧石器时代中晚期过渡:关于肖维岩洞艺术旧石器时代晚期早期年代的考古学论据之评论
J Hum Evol. 2008 Nov;55(5):908-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
3
Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400-200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel.系统刀生产在晚更新世(400-200 千年前)的以色列 Qesem 洞穴。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Oct;61(4):458-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
4
Circulation of whale-bone artifacts in the northern Pyrenees during the late Upper Paleolithic.在晚更新世时期,鲸鱼骨制品在比利牛斯山脉北部的流通。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Nov;65(5):525-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
5
Climatic conditions, settlement patterns and cultures in the Paleolithic: the example of the Garonne Valley (southwest France).旧石器时代的气候条件、居住模式和文化:以法国西南部加龙河谷为例。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Nov;61(5):538-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
6
Socio-economic dynamics of Magdalenian hunter-gatherers: Functional perspective.马格德林时期采集狩猎者的社会经济动态:功能视角。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0274819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274819. eCollection 2022.
7
Hammer or crescent wrench? Stone-tool form and function in the Aurignacian of southwest Germany.锤子还是月牙扳手?德国西南部奥瑞纳文化时期的石器形式与功能
J Hum Evol. 2008 May;54(5):648-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Knapping tools in Magdalenian contexts: New evidence from Gough's Cave (Somerset, UK).磨制石器在马格德林文化时期的应用:来自英国萨默塞特郡高夫洞的新证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261031. eCollection 2021.
9
Evolutionary trends of stature in upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe.旧石器时代晚期和中石器时代欧洲身高的进化趋势。
J Hum Evol. 1999 Mar;36(3):319-33. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0270.
10
Hominin occupations at the Dmanisi site, Georgia, Southern Caucasus: raw materials and technical behaviours of Europe's first hominins.格鲁吉亚南高加索地区德马尼西遗址的古人类活动:欧洲最早古人类的原材料和技术行为。
J Hum Evol. 2011 May;60(5):571-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.008. Epub 2011 Jan 31.