• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统刀生产在晚更新世(400-200 千年前)的以色列 Qesem 洞穴。

Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400-200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel.

机构信息

Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2011 Oct;61(4):458-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003
PMID:21813161
Abstract

Qesem Cave is assigned to the Acheulo-Yabrudian cultural complex of the late Lower Paleolithic period. The 7.5 m deep stratigraphic sequence is dated to 400-200 ka (thousands of years ago). It is mostly attributed to the Amudian blade-dominated industry, one of the earliest blade production technologies in the world. In this paper, we present the results of a detailed study of five Amudian assemblages from Qesem Cave and suggest two trajectories for the production of blades at the site. We argue that the reduction sequences of blades at Qesem Cave represent an innovative and straightforward technology aimed at the systemic and serial production of predetermined blanks. We suggest that this predetermined blank technology shows planning and intensity that is not significantly different from Middle Paleolithic Mousterian technological systems. Furthermore, this well-organized serial manufacture of cutting implements mainly for butchering might indicates that a significant change in human behavior had taken place by the late Lower Paleolithic period.

摘要

盖森洞被归入旧石器时代晚期阿舍利-亚伯都利文化复合体。这个 7.5 米深的地层序列的年代可以追溯到 40 万至 20 万年前。它主要归因于阿穆迪安的刀片主导型工业,这是世界上最早的刀片生产技术之一。在本文中,我们介绍了对盖森洞的五个阿穆迪安组合的详细研究结果,并提出了该遗址生产刀片的两种轨迹。我们认为,盖森洞的刀片减少序列代表了一种创新和直接的技术,旨在系统性和序列化生产预定的坯料。我们认为,这种预定的坯料技术表明了规划和强度,与中更新世莫斯特技术系统没有显著差异。此外,这种用于屠宰的切割工具的有序系列制造主要表明,到旧石器时代晚期,人类行为发生了重大变化。

相似文献

1
Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400-200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel.系统刀生产在晚更新世(400-200 千年前)的以色列 Qesem 洞穴。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Oct;61(4):458-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
2
Hearth-side socioeconomics, hunting and paleoecology during the late Lower Paleolithic at Qesem Cave, Israel.以色列 Qesem 洞晚更新世的炉边社会经济学、狩猎和古生态学。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Feb;60(2):213-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.006. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
3
Uranium series dates from Qesem Cave, Israel, and the end of the Lower Palaeolithic.来自以色列凯塞姆洞穴及旧石器时代晚期结束时的铀系年代测定。
Nature. 2003 Jun 26;423(6943):977-9. doi: 10.1038/nature01718.
4
Interpreting the Quina and demi-Quina scrapers from Acheulo-Yabrudian Qesem Cave, Israel: Results of raw materials and functional analyses.解读来自以色列阿舍利-亚伯鲁德时期的 Qesem 洞穴中的奎那和准奎那刮刀:原材料和功能分析的结果。
J Hum Evol. 2020 Jul;144:102798. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102798. Epub 2020 May 4.
5
Recycling for a purpose in the late Lower Paleolithic Levant: Use-wear and residue analyses of small sharp flint items indicate a planned and integrated subsistence behavior at Qesem Cave (Israel).在旧石器时代晚期黎凡特的有目的回收利用:对小型燧石尖状器的使用痕迹和残留物分析表明,在 Qesem 洞穴(以色列)存在有计划和综合的生存行为。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Jun;131:109-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Dating the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Levant: a view from Misliya Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel.黎凡特下更新世至中更新世过渡时期的年代测定:来自以色列 Carmel 山 Misliya 洞的观察。
J Hum Evol. 2013 Nov;65(5):585-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Acheulo-Yabrudian and Early Middle Paleolithic at Hayonim Cave (Western Galilee, Israel): Continuity or break?阿舍利-雅布若文化期和中更新世早期在海诺姆洞(以色列加利利西部):连续还是断裂?
J Hum Evol. 2020 Feb;139:102733. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102733. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
8
Evidence for habitual use of fire at the end of the Lower Paleolithic: site-formation processes at Qesem Cave, Israel.旧石器时代晚期用火的证据:以色列凯塞姆洞穴的遗址形成过程
J Hum Evol. 2007 Aug;53(2):197-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
9
Middle Pleistocene dental remains from Qesem Cave (Israel).中更新世的牙齿化石来自凯瑟姆洞穴(以色列)。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Apr;144(4):575-92. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21446. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
10
Feathers and food: Human-bird interactions at Middle Pleistocene Qesem Cave, Israel.羽毛与食物:以色列中更新世 Qesem 洞穴的人类-鸟类互动。
J Hum Evol. 2019 Nov;136:102653. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2019.102653. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to: An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China.回复:中国北方柿子园遗址的旧石器时代晚期早期归属缺乏实证支持。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan;9(1):38-41. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02554-x. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.回归基础:石器技术中“溯源”概念助力追踪古人类技术创新
Evol Anthropol. 2024 Dec;33(6):e22045. doi: 10.1002/evan.22045. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
The expansion of Acheulean hominins into the Nefud Desert of Arabia.
阿舍利手斧人扩展到阿拉伯内夫得沙漠。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 12;11(1):10111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89489-6.
4
Estimating temperatures of heated Lower Palaeolithic flint artefacts.加热的下旧石器时代燧石文物的温度估计。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Feb;5(2):221-228. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00955-z. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
The use of ash at Late Lower Paleolithic Qesem Cave, Israel-An integrated study of use-wear and residue analysis.以色列下旧石器时代晚期 Qesem 洞穴中的灰烬使用情况——使用痕迹与残留物分析的综合研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0237502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237502. eCollection 2020.
6
Dedicated core-on-anvil production of bladelet-like flakes in the Acheulean at Thomas Quarry I - L1 (Casablanca, Morocco).在摩洛哥卡萨布兰卡的托马斯采石场 I-L1 的阿舍利石器工业中,专门制作叶片状石片。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65903-3.
7
Shaped stone balls were used for bone marrow extraction at Lower Paleolithic Qesem Cave, Israel.形状规整的石球曾被用于在以色列旧石器时代下切斯姆洞(Lower Paleolithic Qesem Cave)提取骨髓。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0230972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230972. eCollection 2020.
8
Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates.识别石器切割刃生产速率演变中的主要转变。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167244. eCollection 2016.
9
Predetermined flake production at the Lower/Middle Paleolithic boundary: Yabrudian scraper-blank technology.旧石器时代中晚期边界处的预定片状石器生产:亚布鲁迪安刮削器坯料技术。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 5;9(9):e106293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106293. eCollection 2014.
10
Using bones to shape stones: MIS 9 bone retouchers at both edges of the Mediterranean Sea.用骨头塑形石头:地中海两岸的中石器时代 9 号骨修器。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e76780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076780. eCollection 2013.