• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹腔腹腔镜单部位手术与标准腹腔镜肾上腺切除术单外科医生系列的比较。

Comparison of single-surgeon series of transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.052.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.052
PMID:22386401
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) adrenalectomy and determine whether it shows any objective advantage compared with standard laparoscopy.

METHODS

From August 2009 to May 2011, 13 transperitoneal LESS adrenalectomies were performed through a 2-3-cm skin incision using the TriPort access system. This cohort was compared with a contemporary 1:2 matched-pair group of 26 patients undergoing standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy by the same urologist. The perioperative outcomes, including cosmetic satisfaction scores, were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The 2 groups were comparable with respect to patient demographics, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization (P > .05). The LESS procedures had a longer mean operative time (148.5 vs 112.9 minutes, P = .032) but a significantly lower postoperative visual analog pain scale score (2.3 vs 3.7, P = .001), fewer patients requiring analgesics (30.8% vs 73.1%, P = .011), and an earlier resumption of oral intake (21.6 vs 26.0 hours, P = .002). The mean length of the scar in the LESS group was much smaller (2.3 vs 5.9 cm, P < .0001) with a statistically significant greater mean cosmetic satisfaction score (9.5 vs 9.1, P = .042).

CONCLUSION

The perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal LESS adrenalectomy for small adrenal tumors were comparable to those with the standard laparoscopic approach. It also provides better postoperative pain control, faster recovery of bowel function, and better cosmetic satisfaction than standard laparoscopy, albeit with a longer operative time.

摘要

目的

评估经腹腔腹腔镜单部位(LESS)肾上腺切除术的可行性、安全性和疗效,并确定其与标准腹腔镜相比是否具有任何客观优势。

方法

2009 年 8 月至 2011 年 5 月,通过 2-3cm 的皮肤切口使用 TriPort 通道系统完成了 13 例经腹腔 LESS 肾上腺切除术。通过相同的泌尿科医生将这一组与同期的 26 例接受标准腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的 1:2 匹配对患者组进行比较。对包括美容满意度评分在内的围手术期结果进行了统计学分析。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学、估计失血量和术后住院时间具有可比性(P>.05)。LESS 手术的平均手术时间较长(148.5 分钟比 112.9 分钟,P=.032),但术后视觉模拟疼痛评分明显较低(2.3 分比 3.7 分,P=.001),需要止痛药的患者较少(30.8%比 73.1%,P=.011),并且更早恢复口服摄入(21.6 小时比 26.0 小时,P=.002)。LESS 组的疤痕平均长度要小得多(2.3 厘米比 5.9 厘米,P<.0001),且美容满意度评分显著更高(9.5 分比 9.1 分,P=.042)。

结论

对于小的肾上腺肿瘤,经腹腔 LESS 肾上腺切除术的围手术期结果与标准腹腔镜方法相当。它还提供了更好的术后疼痛控制、更快的肠道功能恢复和更好的美容满意度,尽管手术时间较长。

相似文献

1
Comparison of single-surgeon series of transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy.经腹腔腹腔镜单部位手术与标准腹腔镜肾上腺切除术单外科医生系列的比较。
Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.052.
2
Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与标准腹腔镜左供肾切除术:配对比较。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: bilateral step-by-step technique.腹腔镜单孔后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:双侧分步技术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3351-3352. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5400-1. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
4
Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for surgical adrenal disease.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺外科疾病的比较
Can J Urol. 2003 Oct;10(5):1995-9.
5
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗良性肾上腺肿瘤的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):1-10.
6
Comparison of three techniques for adrenalectomy.三种肾上腺切除术技术的比较。
Br J Surg. 1997 May;84(5):679-82.
7
Comparison of 3 surgical approaches to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a nonrandomized, background matched analysis.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术三种手术入路的比较:一项非随机、背景匹配分析
J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):437-43.
8
A matched-pair comparison of single plus one port versus standard extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single urologist.一位泌尿外科医生对单孔加一孔与标准腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术进行的配对比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Jul;31(7):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 13.
9
Robotic vs laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):272-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2040.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched-pair comparison with the gold standard.经脐单孔腹腔镜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:与金标准的配对比较。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1506-z. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration of umbilical hernia incidence and etiology in 753 cases of single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.753例单孔腹腔镜手术脐疝发生率及病因探讨:一项回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2025 May 22;25(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02958-x.
2
Initial experience of laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy with a novel purpose-built robotic system.使用新型专用机器人系统进行腹腔镜单孔根治性前列腺切除术的初步经验。
Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Efficacy and safety of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
单孔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与传统腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的疗效及安全性:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):20-34. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.110446. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy: A systemic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔肾上腺切除术与多孔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 May 21;66:102388. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102388. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Open adrenalectomy: A 20-year review of our experience in a developing country.开放性肾上腺切除术:对我们在一个发展中国家20年经验的回顾。
Ann Afr Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;19(1):26-30. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_10_19.
6
Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.接受腹腔镜肾上腺切除术患者延长住院时间的危险因素。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Jun;13(2):141-147. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.73357. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
7
The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: an analysis of over 100 cases.腹腔镜单孔肾上腺切除术的学习曲线:100余例病例分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):170-177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4950-6. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
A matched-pair comparison of single plus one port versus standard extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single urologist.一位泌尿外科医生对单孔加一孔与标准腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术进行的配对比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Jul;31(7):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 13.
9
Robotic single-site versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which is cheaper? A cost report and analysis.机器人单孔与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:哪种成本更低?一份成本报告与分析。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):267-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4203-0. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery adrenalectomy - own experience and matched case-control study with standard laparoscopic adrenalectomy.经腹腔镜单孔手术肾上腺切除术——自身经验及与标准腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的配对病例对照研究
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Dec;9(4):596-602. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.46803. Epub 2014 Nov 12.