• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗良性肾上腺肿瘤的比较。

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms.

作者信息

Brunt L M, Doherty G M, Norton J A, Soper N J, Quasebarth M A, Moley J F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):1-10.

PMID:8673301
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has recently been used for removing a variety of adrenal neoplasms. The purpose of the present study was to compare results and outcomes in patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open adrenalectomy at our institution from 1988 to the present.

STUDY DESIGN

The records of 66 consecutive patients with benign adrenal neoplasms who underwent adrenalectomy from 1988 through 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the operative approach: group I (n = 25), open anterior transabdominal approach; group II (n = 17), open posterior retroperitoneal approach; and group III (n = 24), laparoscopic transabdominal flank approach. Various parameters were compared and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The three groups were similar in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and distribution of unilateral compared with bilateral adrenalectomy. Mean tumor size was slightly larger in group I (3.4 +/- 1.4 cm) than in group II (2.4 +/- 1.4 cm) or group III (2.7 +/- 1.4 cm) (p = NS). Mean operative times for unilateral adrenalectomy were 142 +/- 38 minutes in group I, 136 +/- 34 minutes in group II, and 183 +/- 35 minutes in group III (p < 0.001, groups I and II compared with group III). For bilateral adrenalectomy, mean operative times were 205 +/- 71 minutes (group I), 328 +/- 11 minutes (group II), and 422 +/- 77 minutes (group III). Patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy had significantly less operative blood loss (mean, 104 mL compared to 408 mL in group I and 366 mL in group II, p < 0.001) and a lower incidence of perioperative blood transfusion. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was also associated with significantly reduced parenteral pain medication requirements (p < or = 0.001) and more rapid resumption of a regular diet (p < or = 0.01) compared to open adrenalectomy. Postoperative length of stay was significantly longer in group I (8.7 +/- 4.5 days) and in group II (6.2 +/- 3.9 days) after open adrenalectomy than after laparoscopic adrenalectomy (3.2 +/- 0.9 days) (p < 0.01). Total hospital charges were similar for groups II and III but somewhat higher for group I. Patients were able to resume 100 percent activity an average of 10.6 +/- 4.9 days after laparoscopic adrenalectomy and returned to work a mean of 16.0 +/- 6.1 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective procedure and has several advantages over open adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy should become the preferred operative approach for the treatment of patients with small, benign adrenal neoplasms.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术近来已用于切除各种肾上腺肿瘤。本研究的目的是比较1988年至今在我院接受腹腔镜或开放性肾上腺切除术患者的结果及预后。

研究设计

回顾性分析了1988年至1995年连续66例接受肾上腺切除术的良性肾上腺肿瘤患者的记录。根据手术方式将患者分为三组:第一组(n = 25),开放性经腹前入路;第二组(n = 17),开放性经后腹膜后入路;第三组(n = 24),腹腔镜经腹侧入路。比较了各项参数并进行了统计分析。

结果

三组患者在年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分级以及单侧与双侧肾上腺切除术的分布方面相似。第一组平均肿瘤大小(3.4±1.4 cm)略大于第二组(2.4±1.4 cm)或第三组(2.7±1.4 cm)(p =无显著性差异)。单侧肾上腺切除术的平均手术时间在第一组为142±38分钟,第二组为136±34分钟,第三组为183±35分钟(p < 0.001,第一组和第二组与第三组比较)。对于双侧肾上腺切除术,平均手术时间分别为205±71分钟(第一组)、328±11分钟(第二组)和422±77分钟(第三组)。接受腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的患者术中失血量明显较少(平均104 mL,而第一组为408 mL,第二组为366 mL,p < 0.001),围手术期输血发生率较低。与开放性肾上腺切除术相比,腹腔镜肾上腺切除术还与肠外止痛药物需求显著减少(p≤0.001)以及恢复正常饮食更快(p≤0.01)相关。开放性肾上腺切除术后第一组(8.7±4.5天)和第二组(6.2±3.9天)的术后住院时间明显长于腹腔镜肾上腺切除术后(3.2±0.9天)(p < 0.01)。第二组和第三组的总住院费用相似,但第一组略高。腹腔镜肾上腺切除术后患者平均10.6±4.9天能够恢复100%的活动,术后平均16.0±6.1天返回工作岗位。

结论

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是一种安全有效的手术方法,与开放性肾上腺切除术相比有几个优点。腹腔镜肾上腺切除术应成为治疗小的良性肾上腺肿瘤患者的首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy compared to open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasms.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗良性肾上腺肿瘤的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):1-10.
2
Laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for surgical adrenal disease.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺外科疾病的比较
Can J Urol. 2003 Oct;10(5):1995-9.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic adrenalectomy with open surgery for adrenal tumors.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放手术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2009 Aug;25(8):438-44. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70539-X.
4
Laparoscopic vs open adrenalectomy for benign adrenal neoplasm.腹腔镜与开放肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺良性肿瘤
Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1356-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640080052. Epub 2001 Aug 16.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与开放性肾上腺切除术的比较。
Am Surg. 1997 Oct;63(10):908-12.
6
Laparoscopic approach to adrenalectomy: review of perioperative outcomes in a single center.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:单中心围手术期结果回顾
Am Surg. 2011 May;77(5):592-6.
7
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy and splenectomy are safe and reduce hospital stay and charges.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术和脾切除术安全且可缩短住院时间并降低费用。
Am Surg. 2003 May;69(5):377-81.
8
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: does size matter?腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿块:大小重要吗?
Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.019. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
9
Anterior, posterior, or laparoscopic approach for the management of adrenal diseases?肾上腺疾病的治疗采用前路、后路还是腹腔镜入路?
Am J Surg. 1997 Feb;173(2):120-5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00408-4.
10
[Safety analysis of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal pheochromocytoma of 5 to 10 cm].[5至10厘米肾上腺嗜铬细胞瘤腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的安全性分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug 15;46(16):1245-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Laparoscopic Adrenal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 83 Patients at a Tertiary Cancer Center.优化腹腔镜肾上腺手术:对一家三级癌症中心83例患者的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Aug 8;17(8):e89621. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89621. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Does size still matter? - Feasibility of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for tumors >6cm.尺寸仍然重要吗?——后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗直径>6cm肿瘤的可行性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 13;410(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03769-7.
3
MEN2: surgical precision in the era of precision medicine.
MEN2:精准医学时代的手术精准性。
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2025 Jun 6;32(6). doi: 10.1530/ERC-24-0251. Print 2025 Jun 1.
4
Minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenocortical cancers: A systematic review.肾上腺皮质癌的微创肾上腺切除术:一项系统评价
Indian J Urol. 2025 Apr-Jun;41(2):91-97. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_343_24. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Benefits of transitioning from transperitoneal laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-a single center experience.从经腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术过渡到后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的益处——单中心经验
Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):1977-1985. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-286. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
6
Safety and feasibility of single-port surgery for posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic system: a retrospective cohort study.使用达芬奇SP机器人系统行后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术单孔手术的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8269-8276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10380-8. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
7
Laparoscopic or Open Adrenalectomy for Stage I-II Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.腹腔镜或开放性肾上腺切除术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期肾上腺皮质癌:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 26;12(11):3698. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113698.
8
Pathological and clinical outcomes of adrenalectomy: A multi-center experience in Saudi Arabia.肾上腺切除术的病理及临床结果:沙特阿拉伯的多中心经验
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023 Mar;30(3):103575. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103575. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
9
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经侧腹肾上腺切除术:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8619-8629. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09663-3. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Should We Hesitate to Perform Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Pheochromacytomas Larger Than 5 cm in Diameter with No Pre-Operative Suspicious Criteria for Malignancy?对于直径大于5厘米且术前无恶性可疑标准的嗜铬细胞瘤,我们是否应犹豫是否进行腹腔镜肾上腺切除术?
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Jun 28;56(2):244-249. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.81598. eCollection 2022.