Norwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development, Oslo, Norway.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):167-80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2007. Epub 2012 Mar 4.
This article describes the validation of the Angry Aggression Scales (AAS), the Behavior Inhibition System and the Behavior Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, the reactive aggression and proactive power scales in relation to a Norwegian sample of 101 antisocial youths with conduct problems (64 boys, 37 girls, mean age 15 ± 1.3 years) and 101 prosocial controls matched on age, gender, education, ethnicity, and school district. Maximum likelihood exploratory factor analyses with oblique rotation were performed on AAS, BIS/BAS, reactive aggression and proactive power scales as well as computation of Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Tests for normality and homogeneity of variance were acceptable. Factor analyses of AAS and the proactive/reactive aggression scales suggested a hierarchical structure comprising a single higher-order angry aggression (AA) factor and four and two lower-order factors, respectively. Moreover, results suggested one BIS factor and a single higher-order BAS factor with three lower-order factors related to drive, fun-seeking and reward responsiveness. To compare scores of antisocial youths with controls, t-tests on the mean scale scores were computed. Results confirmed that antisocial youths were different from controls on the above-mentioned scales. Consistent with the idea that anger is associated with approach motivation, AAS scores correlated with behavioral activation, but only explosive/reactive and vengeful/ruminative AA correlated with behavioral inhibition. Results generally validated the quadruple typology of aggression and violence proposed by Howard (2009).
本文描述了愤怒攻击性量表(AAS)、行为抑制系统和行为激活系统(BIS/BAS)量表、反应性攻击性和主动性力量量表在挪威 101 名有行为问题的反社会青年(64 名男孩,37 名女孩,平均年龄 15 ± 1.3 岁)和 101 名与之匹配的亲社会对照组中的验证情况,这些对照组在年龄、性别、教育、种族和学区方面相匹配。对 AAS、BIS/BAS、反应性攻击性和主动性力量量表进行了最大似然探索性因子分析,并进行了斜交旋转,同时计算了 Cronbach 的 alpha 和 McDonald 的 omega。正态性和方差同质性检验是可以接受的。AAS 和主动/反应性攻击性量表的因子分析表明,存在一个单一的高阶愤怒攻击性(AA)因子和四个和两个低阶因子。此外,结果表明存在一个 BIS 因子和一个单一的高阶 BAS 因子,与驱力、寻求乐趣和奖励反应性相关的三个低阶因子。为了比较反社会青年和对照组的得分,计算了平均量表得分的 t 检验。结果证实,反社会青年在上述量表上与对照组存在差异。与愤怒与趋近动机相关的观点一致,AAS 得分与行为激活相关,但只有爆发性/反应性和报复性/沉思性 AA 与行为抑制相关。结果总体上验证了霍华德(2009 年)提出的攻击性和暴力的四重分类法。