Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1616-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2244-9. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Spinal fusion as a treatment for degenerative disc disease is controversial. Prior authors have identified various MRI findings as being pain generators, which might help guide patient selection for lumbar fusion procedures. These findings have included disc desiccation, disc contour, high-intensity zone annular disruption, the presence of Modic endplate changes, and disc space collapse. The purpose of this study is to investigate which MRI findings in patients with degenerative disc disease predict clinical improvement with lumbar fusion.
A single-center surgical database of patients undergoing lumbar fusion was reviewed for patients whose indication for fusion surgery was primary disc pathology. We identified 51 patients (71 disc levels) who had completed 2-year prospectively collected outcomes questionnaires and had preoperative MRIs available for review. NRS (0-10) back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 Physical Composite Summary scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. MRIs were reviewed by three fellowship-trained spine surgeons who were asked to grade them for the following five characteristics: (a) disc desiccation, (b) disc contour, (c) presence of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) annular tear, (d) presence of Modic endplate changes and (e) disc height. Two-year outcome measures were compared to MRI findings to identify which findings correlated with improvement in outcome scores.
Statistically significant improvements were noted in back pain, leg pain, SF-36 PCS and ODI in the group overall. Disc desiccation, disc contour, presence of an HIZ lesion, and the presence of Modic endplate changes did not correlate with 2-year outcomes. Disc height was correlated with 2-year change in outcome measures. Discs with preoperative height less than 5 mm demonstrated a 23.4 point ODI improvement compared to 9.2 points for discs >7 mm. Similarly, SF-36 PCS improved 9.5 points in discs <5 mm compared to 0.7 in discs greater than 7 mm. Discs between 5 and 7 mm demonstrated intermediate levels of improvement.
Several commonly utilized MRI criteria proposed as indications for lumbar fusion do not seem to correlate with 2-year improvement in clinical outcomes. Discs which are narrowed and collapsed, preoperatively, demonstrate better improvement at 2 years postoperatively as compared to discs which have maintained disc height. Significant disc space collapse may represent a subset of "degenerative disc disease" which responds more favorably to treatment with fusion.
脊柱融合术作为治疗退行性椎间盘疾病的一种方法存在争议。先前的作者已经确定了各种 MRI 发现是疼痛的产生因素,这可能有助于指导腰椎融合术患者的选择。这些发现包括椎间盘干燥、椎间盘轮廓、高信号区环形破裂、Modic 终板改变的存在以及椎间盘间隙塌陷。本研究的目的是研究退行性椎间盘疾病患者的哪些 MRI 发现可以预测腰椎融合后的临床改善。
对接受腰椎融合术的单中心手术数据库进行回顾性研究,纳入融合手术指征为原发性椎间盘病变的患者。我们共纳入了 51 名患者(71 个椎间盘水平),这些患者完成了前瞻性收集的 2 年随访结果问卷,并可获得术前 MRI 进行评估。术前及术后 1 年和 2 年分别评估患者的 NRS(0-10)腰痛和腿痛、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和 SF-36 生理综合评分。由 3 名脊柱外科 fellowship培训医师对 MRI 进行评估,要求他们对以下 5 种特征进行分级:(a)椎间盘干燥,(b)椎间盘轮廓,(c)存在高信号区(HIZ)环形撕裂,(d)Modic 终板改变,和(e)椎间盘高度。将 2 年的结果测量值与 MRI 发现进行比较,以确定哪些发现与结果评分的改善相关。
总体而言,患者的腰痛、腿痛、SF-36 PCS 和 ODI 均有显著改善。椎间盘干燥、椎间盘轮廓、HIZ 病变的存在和 Modic 终板改变与 2 年的结果无关。椎间盘高度与 2 年的结果测量值变化相关。术前高度小于 5mm 的椎间盘与大于 7mm 的椎间盘相比,ODI 改善了 23.4 分,而 SF-36 PCS 改善了 9.5 分。同样,术前高度小于 5mm 的椎间盘与大于 7mm 的椎间盘相比,SF-36 PCS 改善了 9.5 分,而大于 7mm 的椎间盘仅改善了 0.7 分。5-7mm 的椎间盘显示出中间水平的改善。
几种常用的 MRI 标准被认为是腰椎融合的指征,但似乎与 2 年的临床结果改善不相关。术前变窄和塌陷的椎间盘与保持椎间盘高度的椎间盘相比,术后 2 年改善更好。明显的椎间盘间隙塌陷可能代表“退行性椎间盘疾病”的一个亚组,对融合治疗的反应更好。