Suppr超能文献

肿瘤生物标志物研究的临床试验设计

Design of clinical trials for biomarker research in oncology.

作者信息

Mandrekar Sumithra J, Sargent Daniel J

机构信息

Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Clin Investig (Lond). 2011 Dec;1(12):1629-1636. doi: 10.4155/CLI.11.152.

Abstract

The developmental pathway from discovery to clinical practice for biomarkers and biomarker-directed therapies is complex. While several issues need careful consideration, two critical issues that surround the validation of biomarkers are the choice of clinical trial design (which is based on the strength of the preliminary evidence and marker prevalence) and the biomarker assay related issues surrounding the marker assessment methods such as the reliability and reproducibility of the assay. This review focuses on trial designs for marker validation, both in the setting of early phase trials for initial validation, as well as in the context of larger definitive trials. Designs for biomarker validation are broadly classified as retrospective (i.e., using data from previously well-conducted, randomized, controlled trials) or prospective (enrichment, allcomers or adaptive). We believe that the systematic evaluation and implementation of these design strategies are essential to accelerate the clinical validation of biomarker-guided therapy, thereby taking us a step closer to the goal of personalized medicine.

摘要

生物标志物及生物标志物导向疗法从发现到临床应用的发展路径十分复杂。虽然有几个问题需要仔细考虑,但围绕生物标志物验证的两个关键问题是临床试验设计的选择(这基于初步证据的强度和标志物患病率)以及与生物标志物检测相关的问题,例如检测方法的可靠性和可重复性等标志物评估方法。本综述聚焦于标志物验证的试验设计,包括用于初始验证的早期试验设置,以及更大规模的确证性试验背景下的设计。生物标志物验证的设计大致分为回顾性(即使用先前精心开展的随机对照试验的数据)或前瞻性(富集、所有受试者或适应性)。我们认为,对这些设计策略进行系统评估和实施对于加速生物标志物导向疗法的临床验证至关重要,从而使我们向个性化医疗的目标迈进一步。

相似文献

1
Design of clinical trials for biomarker research in oncology.
Clin Investig (Lond). 2011 Dec;1(12):1629-1636. doi: 10.4155/CLI.11.152.
2
Drug designs fulfilling the requirements of clinical trials aiming at personalizing medicine.
Chin Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 1;3(2):14. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2014.05.03.
3
A review of phase II trial designs for initial marker validation.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 8.
4
Predictive biomarker validation in practice: lessons from real trials.
Clin Trials. 2010 Oct;7(5):567-73. doi: 10.1177/1740774510368574. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
5
Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges.
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 20;27(24):4027-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3701. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials.
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Apr;6(4):658-60. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820e17cb.
9
Clinical trial designs for testing biomarker-based personalized therapies.
Clin Trials. 2012 Apr;9(2):141-54. doi: 10.1177/1740774512437252. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
10
Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: one size does not fit all.
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(3):530-42. doi: 10.1080/10543400902802458.

引用本文的文献

1
Using circulating tumor DNA as a novel biomarker of efficacy for dose-finding designs in oncology.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Aug;34(8):1665-1683. doi: 10.1177/09622802251350457. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
2
Looking ahead in early-phase trial design to improve the drug development process: examples in oncology.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jun 29;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01979-5.
3
Evolving notions on immune response in colorectal cancer and their implications for biomarker development.
Inflamm Res. 2018 May;67(5):375-389. doi: 10.1007/s00011-017-1128-1. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Optimizing Trial Designs for Targeted Therapies.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 29;11(9):e0163726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163726. eCollection 2016.
6
Bayesian Two-stage Biomarker-based Adaptive Design for Targeted Therapy Development.
Stat Biosci. 2016 Jun;8(1):99-128. doi: 10.1007/s12561-014-9124-2. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149803. eCollection 2016.
8
Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review.
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(1):99-119. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1092034.
9
Next-generation clinical trials: Novel strategies to address the challenge of tumor molecular heterogeneity.
Mol Oncol. 2015 May;9(5):967-96. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
10
Mast cells as a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer.
Dis Markers. 2013;35(6):711-20. doi: 10.1155/2013/478303. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.
Cancer Discov. 2011 Jun;1(1):44-53. doi: 10.1158/2159-8274.CD-10-0010. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
2
Steady progress against HER2-positive breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 6;365(14):1336-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1101326.
3
Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).
J Proteome Res. 2011 Aug 5;10(8):3429-38. doi: 10.1021/pr200021n. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
4
All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials.
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Apr;6(4):658-60. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820e17cb.
5
A threshold sample-enrichment approach in a clinical trial with heterogeneous subpopulations.
Clin Trials. 2010 Oct;7(5):537-45. doi: 10.1177/1740774510378695. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
6
Equipoise lost: ethics, costs, and the regulation of cancer clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 10;28(17):2925-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5404. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
7
Predictive biomarker validation in practice: lessons from real trials.
Clin Trials. 2010 Oct;7(5):567-73. doi: 10.1177/1740774510368574. Epub 2010 Apr 14.
8
The cross-validated adaptive signature design.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;16(2):691-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1357. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
A comparison of phase II study strategies.
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 1;15(19):5950-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3205. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
10
Genomic advances and their impact on clinical trial design.
Genome Med. 2009 Jul 13;1(7):69. doi: 10.1186/gm69.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验