Mandrekar Sumithra J, Sargent Daniel J
Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Clin Investig (Lond). 2011 Dec;1(12):1629-1636. doi: 10.4155/CLI.11.152.
The developmental pathway from discovery to clinical practice for biomarkers and biomarker-directed therapies is complex. While several issues need careful consideration, two critical issues that surround the validation of biomarkers are the choice of clinical trial design (which is based on the strength of the preliminary evidence and marker prevalence) and the biomarker assay related issues surrounding the marker assessment methods such as the reliability and reproducibility of the assay. This review focuses on trial designs for marker validation, both in the setting of early phase trials for initial validation, as well as in the context of larger definitive trials. Designs for biomarker validation are broadly classified as retrospective (i.e., using data from previously well-conducted, randomized, controlled trials) or prospective (enrichment, allcomers or adaptive). We believe that the systematic evaluation and implementation of these design strategies are essential to accelerate the clinical validation of biomarker-guided therapy, thereby taking us a step closer to the goal of personalized medicine.
生物标志物及生物标志物导向疗法从发现到临床应用的发展路径十分复杂。虽然有几个问题需要仔细考虑,但围绕生物标志物验证的两个关键问题是临床试验设计的选择(这基于初步证据的强度和标志物患病率)以及与生物标志物检测相关的问题,例如检测方法的可靠性和可重复性等标志物评估方法。本综述聚焦于标志物验证的试验设计,包括用于初始验证的早期试验设置,以及更大规模的确证性试验背景下的设计。生物标志物验证的设计大致分为回顾性(即使用先前精心开展的随机对照试验的数据)或前瞻性(富集、所有受试者或适应性)。我们认为,对这些设计策略进行系统评估和实施对于加速生物标志物导向疗法的临床验证至关重要,从而使我们向个性化医疗的目标迈进一步。