Suppr超能文献

[妇科实践中的菌尿筛查:中段尿的价值是什么?]

[Bacteriuria screening in gynecologic practice: what is the value of mid-stream urine?].

作者信息

Retzke U, Loth M, Waitz I, Liebetrau B

机构信息

Frauenklinik, Bezirkskrankenhauses Suhl.

出版信息

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1990;112(15):957-62.

PMID:2238994
Abstract

In 55 healthy women corresponding urine proofs were taken by suprapubic punction and by mid stream technique from the same content of the urinary bladder. For detection or exclusion of bacteriuria both collection-methods are of equal value. In 96% of the cases the microbiological results were corresponding. The leucocyte-count is of no value to detect indirectly a bacteriuria as well in punction- and in mid stream urine. A pathologic count is just as little pathognomonic for infection as a normal count excludes a bacteriuria. Therefore the counting of leucocytes should be given up to the favour of a better microbiological observation in gynecological outpatient departments.

摘要

对55名健康女性,通过耻骨上穿刺和中段尿采集技术从膀胱相同尿液中获取对应尿液样本。对于检测或排除菌尿症,两种采集方法具有同等价值。在96%的病例中,微生物学结果一致。无论是穿刺尿液还是中段尿,白细胞计数对于间接检测菌尿症均无价值。病理性计数对于感染并非特异性表现,正常计数也不能排除菌尿症。因此,在妇科门诊,应放弃白细胞计数,转而进行更好的微生物学观察。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验