Center for Urologic Oncology & Minimally Invasive Therapies, Urology Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):614-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0587. Epub 2012 May 3.
Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the standard of care for initial bladder tumor management. In response to its shortcomings, we propose an alternative technique for tumor resection and retrieval: The endoscopic snare resection of bladder tumor (ESRBT). Eleven tumors managed by ESRBT were reviewed retrospectively. Via cystoscopy, tumors were resected en bloc with an electrosurgical polypectomy snare and retrieved transurethrally. Safety and efficacy were assessed by clinical and pathologic outcomes. ESRBT was highly effective for appropriate tumors. Tumor size and location varied: Two small, six medium, three large; six lateral wall, two dome, two trigone, one posterior wall. Half of initial urothelial carcinoma specimens contained muscle. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications (mean follow-up: 17 mos; range 10-25 mos). ESRBT is a feasible technique for the resection of pedunculated bladder tumors. It offers evident and theoretical advantages over TURBT and may augment bladder tumor management. Further study is needed.
经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)是初始膀胱肿瘤管理的标准治疗方法。针对其缺点,我们提出了一种替代的肿瘤切除和检索技术:内镜圈套切除术(ESRBT)。回顾性分析了 11 例采用 ESRBT 治疗的肿瘤。通过膀胱镜检查,用电切息肉切除术圈套器整块切除肿瘤,并经尿道取出。通过临床和病理结果评估安全性和疗效。ESRBT 对合适的肿瘤非常有效。肿瘤的大小和位置各不相同:两个小肿瘤,六个中等大小,三个大肿瘤;六个侧壁,两个穹隆,两个三角区,一个后壁。一半的初始尿路上皮癌标本含有肌肉。无术中或术后并发症(平均随访时间:17 个月;范围 10-25 个月)。ESRBT 是一种可行的有蒂膀胱肿瘤切除术技术。它比 TURBT 具有明显的和理论上的优势,可能增强膀胱肿瘤的管理。需要进一步研究。