Li Kewei, Xu Yongzhi, Tan Mingyue, Xia Shujie, Xu Zhonghua, Xu Dongliang
Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China.
Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 100 Haining Rd, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Feb;34(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2604-8. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Bladder cancer is currently considered the most common malignancy of the urinary tract. Thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumor (TmLRBT) and plasmakinetic transurethral resection of bladder tumor (PK-TURBT) are two alternative common procedures used in our department to manage patients with primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) over the past decade. In this work, the safety and efficacy of TmLRBT were retrospectively compared to those of PK-TURBT in patients with primary NMIBC. From January 2013 to December 2015, 256 patients diagnosed with primary NMIBC were selected for this retrospective study. A total of 136 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary NMIBC were enrolled in the TmLRBT group. A similar historical cohort of 120 consecutive patients who underwent PK-TURBT was used to compare the two procedures. Clinical data, including age, gender, tumor characteristics, operation duration, hospitalization, irrigation, catheterization, and intraoperative and postoperative complications, were recorded. There were no significant differences in age, gender, mean tumor size, mean tumor number, tumor location, or risk between the TmLRBT and PK-TURBT groups. The TmLRBT group was associated with a significantly shorter operation duration (25.96 ± 21.19 min vs 37.18 ± 25.77 min, P = 0.018) and a shorter hospitalization time (3.11 ± 1.05 days vs 5.24 ± 2.06 days, P = 0.036). The postoperative irrigation time (6.33 ± 4.05 h vs 14.76 ± 6.28 h, P = 0.027) and catheterization time (2.03 ± 1.61 days vs 4.27 ± 1.17 days, P = 0.035) in the TmLRBT group were lower than those in the PK-TURBT group. No significant differences in fever and rebleeding were found in the TmLRBT and PK-TURBT groups. There were no significant differences in the overall, low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk recurrence-free rates between the two groups (P = 0.43, P = 0.68, P = 0.71, and P = 0.24, respectively). The proportion of bladder detrusor muscle (BDM) identified in pathologic specimens of the TmLRBT group was higher than that in the PK-TURBT group (P = 0.006). TmLRBT may reduce operation duration time, hospitalization time, postoperative irrigation time, and catheterization time. TmLRBT is considered safer and more effective in treating primary NMIBC. Recurrence-free rates did not differ between groups.
膀胱癌目前被认为是泌尿系统最常见的恶性肿瘤。在过去十年中,铥激光整块切除膀胱肿瘤(TmLRBT)和等离子体动力经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(PK-TURBT)是我们科室用于治疗原发性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者的两种常见替代手术方法。在这项研究中,我们对原发性NMIBC患者进行回顾性研究,比较了TmLRBT与PK-TURBT的安全性和有效性。2013年1月至2015年12月,选取256例诊断为原发性NMIBC的患者进行这项回顾性研究。TmLRBT组纳入了136例连续诊断为原发性NMIBC的患者。选取120例连续接受PK-TURBT的患者作为类似的历史队列,以比较这两种手术方法。记录临床数据,包括年龄、性别、肿瘤特征、手术时间、住院时间、膀胱冲洗、导尿以及术中及术后并发症。TmLRBT组和PK-TURBT组在年龄、性别、平均肿瘤大小、平均肿瘤数量、肿瘤位置或风险方面无显著差异。TmLRBT组的手术时间明显更短(25.96±21.19分钟 vs 37.18±25.77分钟,P = 0.018),住院时间也更短(3.11±1.05天 vs 5.24±2.06天,P = 0.036)。TmLRBT组的术后膀胱冲洗时间(6.33±4.05小时 vs 14.76±6.28小时,P = 0.027)和导尿时间(2.03±1.61天 vs 4.27±1.17天,P = 0.035)低于PK-TURBT组。TmLRBT组和PK-TURBT组在发热和再出血方面无显著差异。两组在总体、低风险、中风险和高风险无复发生存率方面无显著差异(分别为P = 0.43、P = 0.68、P = 0.71和P = 0.24)。TmLRBT组病理标本中膀胱逼尿肌(BDM)的识别比例高于PK-TURBT组(P = 0.006)。TmLRBT可能会缩短手术时间、住院时间、术后膀胱冲洗时间和导尿时间。TmLRBT在治疗原发性NMIBC方面被认为更安全、更有效。两组间无复发生存率无差异。