• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性依地普仑与安慰剂对抑郁症患者一级亲属的人格特质的影响:一项随机试验。

Effect of chronic escitalopram versus placebo on personality traits in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with depression: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031980. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0031980
PMID:22393376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3290539/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The serotonergic neurotransmitter system is closely linked to depression and personality traits. It is not known if selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) have an effect on neuroticism that is independent of their effect on depression. Healthy individuals with a genetic liability for depression represent a group of particular interest when investigating if intervention with SSRIs affects personality. The present trial is the first to test the hypothesis that escitalopram may reduce neuroticism in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with major depressive disorder (MD).

METHODS

The trial used a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled parallel-group design. We examined the effect of four weeks escitalopram 10 mg daily versus matching placebo on personality in 80 people who had a biological parent or sibling with a history of MD. The outcome measure on personality traits was change in self-reported neuroticism scores on the Revised Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPQ) from entry until end of four weeks of intervention.

RESULTS

When compared with placebo, escitalopram did not significantly affect self-reported NEO-PI-R and EPQ neuroticism and extroversion, EPQ psychoticism, NEO-PI-R openness, or NEO-PI-R conscientiousness (p all above 0.05). However, escitalopram increased NEO-PI-R agreeableness scores significantly compared with placebo (mean; SD) (2.38; 8.09) versus (-1.32; 7.94), p = 0.046), but not following correction for multiplicity. A trend was shown for increased conscientiousness (p = 0.07). There was no significant effect on subclinical depressive symptoms (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

In healthy first-degree relatives of patients with MD, there is no effect of escitalopram on neuroticism, but it is possible that escitalopram may increase the personality traits of agreeableness and conscientiousness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00386841.

摘要

简介

血清素能神经递质系统与抑郁和人格特质密切相关。目前尚不清楚选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)是否对神经质有影响,而这种影响与它们对抑郁的影响无关。对于那些有抑郁遗传倾向的健康个体来说,当研究 SSRIs 干预是否会影响人格时,他们是一个特别有趣的群体。本试验首次测试了假设,即艾司西酞普兰可能会降低重度抑郁症(MD)患者一级亲属的神经质。

方法

该试验采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照平行组设计。我们检查了在 80 名有 MD 病史的生物学父母或兄弟姐妹的健康个体中,每天服用艾司西酞普兰 10 毫克 4 周与匹配安慰剂对人格的影响。人格特质的结果测量是在 4 周干预开始到结束时,自我报告的神经质评分的变化,使用修订后的神经质-外向性-开放性-人格量表(NEO-PI-R)和艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)进行评估。

结果

与安慰剂相比,艾司西酞普兰对自我报告的 NEO-PI-R 和 EPQ 神经质和外向性、EPQ 精神病质、NEO-PI-R 开放性或 NEO-PI-R 尽责性均无显著影响(p 均大于 0.05)。然而,与安慰剂相比,艾司西酞普兰显著增加了 NEO-PI-R 的宜人性评分(均值;标准差)(2.38;8.09)与(-1.32;7.94),p=0.046),但未进行多重校正。尽责性呈增加趋势(p=0.07)。对亚临床抑郁症状无显著影响(p=0.6)。

结论

在 MD 患者的一级亲属中,艾司西酞普兰对神经质没有影响,但它可能会增加宜人性和尽责性的人格特质。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00386841。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd54/3290539/fc86f65ea30d/pone.0031980.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd54/3290539/fc86f65ea30d/pone.0031980.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd54/3290539/fc86f65ea30d/pone.0031980.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of chronic escitalopram versus placebo on personality traits in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with depression: a randomized trial.慢性依地普仑与安慰剂对抑郁症患者一级亲属的人格特质的影响:一项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031980. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
2
The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with major depressive disorder - an experimental medicine blinded controlled trial.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对重度抑郁症患者健康一级亲属的影响——一项实验性医学双盲对照试验。
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4426.
3
Personality change during depression treatment: a placebo-controlled trial.抑郁症治疗期间的人格变化:一项安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;66(12):1322-30. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.166.
4
Escitalopram and neuroendocrine response in healthy first-degree relatives to depressed patients--a randomized placebo-controlled trial.依西酞普兰对健康一级亲属(抑郁症患者)神经内分泌反应的影响——一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021224. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
5
Neuroticism as a mediator of treatment response to SSRIs in major depressive disorder.神经质作为重度抑郁症中对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗反应的中介因素
J Affect Disord. 2008 Nov;111(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
6
Neuroticism but not omega-3 fatty acid levels correlate with early responsiveness to escitalopram.神经质而非ω-3脂肪酸水平与艾司西酞普兰的早期反应相关。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;22(3):157-63.
7
Personality traits and escitalopram treatment outcome in major depression.人格特质与重度抑郁症的艾司西酞普兰治疗结果
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;72(5):354-360. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1465590. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Effect of escitalopram versus placebo on GRα messenger RNA expression in peripheral blood cells of healthy individuals with a family history of depression - a secondary outcome analysis from the randomized AGENDA trial.艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂对有抑郁症家族史的健康个体外周血细胞中糖皮质激素受体α信使核糖核酸表达的影响——随机AGENDA试验的次要结局分析
Nord J Psychiatry. 2016;70(4):297-302. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2015.1109138. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Prevention of depression with escitalopram in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.在接受头颈部癌症治疗的患者中用依地普仑预防抑郁:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jul;139(7):678-86. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3371.
10
The impact of chronic depression on acute and long-term outcomes in a randomized trial comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy versus each of 2 different antidepressant medication combinations.在一项比较选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂单药治疗与两种不同抗抑郁药物联合治疗的随机试验中,慢性抑郁症对急性和长期结局的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):967-76. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07043. Epub 2012 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Traits and Psychopathology Over the Course of Six Months of Outpatient Psychotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study.门诊心理治疗六个月过程中的人格特质与精神病理学:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 7;11:174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00174. eCollection 2020.
2
Psychological Status of Volunteers in a Phase I Clinical Trial Assessed by Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ).采用症状自评量表 90(SCL-90)和艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)评估 I 期临床试验志愿者的心理状况。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jul 17;24:4968-4973. doi: 10.12659/MSM.909524.
3
The Effects of Tryptophan on Everyday Interpersonal Encounters and Social Cognitions in Individuals with a Family History of Depression.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial of the effect of escitalopram versus placebo on cognitive function in healthy first-degree relatives of patients with depression.一项随机试验研究了艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂对抑郁症患者一级亲属认知功能的影响。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;1(5):133-44. doi: 10.1177/2045125311422591.
2
Escitalopram and neuroendocrine response in healthy first-degree relatives to depressed patients--a randomized placebo-controlled trial.依西酞普兰对健康一级亲属(抑郁症患者)神经内分泌反应的影响——一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021224. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
3
Short-term antidepressant administration reduces negative self-referential processing in the medial prefrontal cortex in subjects at risk for depression.
色氨酸对有抑郁症家族史个体的日常人际接触和社会认知的影响。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Mar 2;18(8):pyv012. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv012.
4
Possible role of more positive social behaviour in the clinical effect of antidepressant drugs.更积极的社会行为在抗抑郁药物临床疗效中的可能作用。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014 Jan;39(1):60-5. doi: 10.1503/jpn.130165.
5
Preliminary evidence that sub-chronic citalopram triggers the re-evaluation of value in intimate partnerships.初步证据表明,亚慢性西酞普兰会引发对亲密关系中价值的重新评估。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Sep;9(9):1419-25. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst135. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
短期抗抑郁药物治疗可减少抑郁高危人群内侧前额叶皮质的负性自我参照加工。
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 May;17(5):503-10. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.16. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Personality and bipolar disorder: dissecting state and trait associations between mood and personality.人格与双相障碍:剖析心境与人格之间的状态与特质关联。
Psychol Med. 2011 Aug;41(8):1593-604. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710002333. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
5
The effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in healthy subjects. A systematic review.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对健康受试者的影响。一项系统评价。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 May 4;64(3):153-63. doi: 10.3109/08039480903511381.
6
Personality change during depression treatment: a placebo-controlled trial.抑郁症治疗期间的人格变化:一项安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;66(12):1322-30. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.166.
7
The genetic and environmental relationship between major depression and the five-factor model of personality.重性抑郁与五因素人格模型的遗传与环境关系。
Psychol Med. 2010 May;40(5):801-6. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991140. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
8
Rationale and design of the participant, investigator, observer, and data-analyst-blinded randomized AGENDA trial on associations between gene-polymorphisms, endophenotypes for depression and antidepressive intervention: the effect of escitalopram versus placebo on the combined dexamethasone-corticotrophine releasing hormone test and other potential endophenotypes in healthy first-degree relatives of persons with depression.关于基因多态性、抑郁症内表型与抗抑郁干预之间关联的参与者、研究者、观察者和数据分析人员设盲的随机AGENDA试验的原理与设计:艾司西酞普兰与安慰剂对抑郁症患者健康一级亲属联合地塞米松-促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素试验及其他潜在内表型的影响
Trials. 2009 Aug 11;10:66. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-66.
9
Why do antidepressants take so long to work? A cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant drug action.为什么抗抑郁药需要这么长时间才能起效?抗抑郁药物作用的认知神经心理学模型。
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;195(2):102-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.051193.
10
High familial risk for mood disorder is associated with low dorsolateral prefrontal cortex serotonin transporter binding.情绪障碍的高家族风险与背外侧前额叶皮质血清素转运体结合水平低有关。
Neuroimage. 2009 Jun;46(2):360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Feb 20.