Knorr Ulla, Kessing Lars Vedel
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 May 4;64(3):153-63. doi: 10.3109/08039480903511381.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) show antidepressant properties in many patients with a diagnosis of depression. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the effect of SSRIs in healthy patients may lead to an understanding of the yet unclear pathophysiology of depression. Recent reviews of studies investigating the effect of SSRIs in healthy persons conclude that the results are inconsistent and that--in relation to a wide range of outcomes--the effect of SSRIs is limited; however, reasons for the inconsistencies are poorly studied.
To investigate whether methodological artefacts can explain the diverging findings, we conducted a systematic review of all randomized multiple-dose, placebo-controlled trials on the effect of treatment by SSRI for at least a week in healthy persons published before January 2009.
We identified 33 trials, investigating six SSRIs and 163 outcome tests. The effect of SSRI showed divergence presumably related to methodological issues. Specifically, it is likely that the majority of studies included a mix of healthy persons with and without a family history of affective disorders. Few presented information on factors that may influence outcomes such as age, gender, family history of psychiatric disorder, drug levels and ethnicity. No study fulfilled principles of conducting and reporting randomized controlled trials, according to the CONSORT Statement guidelines.
It is unclear whether the effect of SSRIs in healthy persons may lead to an understanding of the pathophysiology of depression, since the present evidence is divergent and may be severely influenced by a number of methodological drawbacks.
选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在许多被诊断为抑郁症的患者中显示出抗抑郁特性。了解SSRIs在健康患者中发挥作用的潜在机制,可能有助于理解目前尚不清楚的抑郁症病理生理学。最近对研究SSRIs对健康人影响的研究进行的综述得出结论,结果并不一致,而且就广泛的结果而言,SSRIs的作用有限;然而,对于结果不一致的原因研究较少。
为了调查方法学假象是否可以解释这些不同的研究结果,我们对2009年1月之前发表的所有关于SSRIs治疗健康人至少一周效果的随机多剂量、安慰剂对照试验进行了系统综述。
我们确定了33项试验,研究了6种SSRIs和163项结果测试。SSRIs的作用显示出差异,这可能与方法学问题有关。具体而言,很可能大多数研究纳入了有和没有情感障碍家族史的健康人。很少有研究提供可能影响结果的因素信息,如年龄、性别、精神疾病家族史、药物水平和种族。根据CONSORT声明指南,没有一项研究符合进行和报告随机对照试验的原则。
目前尚不清楚SSRIs对健康人的作用是否有助于理解抑郁症的病理生理学,因为目前的证据存在分歧,并且可能受到一些方法学缺陷的严重影响。