• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)中自固定补片与纤维蛋白胶固定补片的比较。

Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP).

作者信息

Cambal M, Zonca P, Hrbaty B

机构信息

1st Department of Surgery, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(2):103-7. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_024.

DOI:10.4149/bll_2012_024
PMID:22394041
Abstract

AIM

Comparison of self-gripping mesh with fibrin-glue mesh fixation for laparoscopic hernia repair using TAPP technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trial has a prospective randomized design. The primary end-point was the evaluation of pain at 2 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The pain occurring 3 months after the surgery was considered as chronic pain.

RESULTS

We have compared a group of 50 patients with self-gripping mesh with a group of 50 patients with fibrin glue mesh fixation using TAPP technique. There was no statistical difference between the basic group parameters (sex distribution, average age). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative pain 1 month and 3 months after the surgery (p>0.05). There was no patient with chronic pain at 3-month follow-up in our trial. The mean operation time was 44 minutes in the group with self-gripping mesh and 48.5 minutes in the group with fibrin glue mesh fixation. There was a significant difference between both groups (p=0.006)

CONCLUSION

Both fixation methods appear to be a well-tolerated alternative to classical methods for mesh fixation with clips. According to our trial there is no difference in the postoperative pain incidence in self-gripping mesh and fibrin glue mesh fixation groups for laparoscopic hernia repair. Our data has showed that self-gripping mesh represents a tendency to a faster technique in comparison with fibrin-glue fixation. Both techniques are easy-to-use. There is no superior technique according to our trial (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 23).

摘要

目的

比较自固定补片与纤维蛋白胶补片固定用于经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的效果。

材料与方法

本试验采用前瞻性随机设计。主要终点是评估术后2天、1个月和3个月时的疼痛情况。术后3个月出现的疼痛被视为慢性疼痛。

结果

我们将一组50例使用自固定补片的患者与一组50例使用纤维蛋白胶补片固定并采用TAPP技术的患者进行了比较。两组基本参数(性别分布、平均年龄)之间无统计学差异。两组在术后1个月和3个月时的疼痛情况无显著差异(p>0.05)。在我们的试验中,3个月随访时没有患者出现慢性疼痛。自固定补片组的平均手术时间为44分钟,纤维蛋白胶补片固定组为48.5分钟。两组之间存在显著差异(p=0.006)。

结论

两种固定方法似乎都是传统夹闭补片固定方法耐受性良好的替代方法。根据我们的试验,自固定补片组和纤维蛋白胶补片固定组在腹腔镜疝修补术后的疼痛发生率没有差异。我们的数据表明,与纤维蛋白胶固定相比,自固定补片的技术操作倾向于更快。两种技术都易于使用。根据我们的试验,没有哪种技术更具优势(表2,图2,参考文献23)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP).腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)中自固定补片与纤维蛋白胶固定补片的比较。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(2):103-7. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_024.
2
Fibrin glue versus staple mesh fixation in single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A propensity score-matched analysis.纤维蛋白胶与钉板网片固定在单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
How I do it: the horizontal-bilateral unfolding method for self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh placement in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.我的操作方法:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中用于自固定(Progrip™)补片放置的水平双侧展开法
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):809-815. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01896-x. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Long-term outcome and chronic pain in atraumatic fibrin glue versus staple fixation of extra light titanized meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single-center experience.在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中,使用无创伤性纤维蛋白胶与钉合固定超轻钛化网比较的长期结果和慢性疼痛:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1929-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06965-x. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks.网片固定方法与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛:纤维蛋白胶与钉枪的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4077-4084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5454-8. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
Fibrin glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: indications, technique, and outcomes.用于腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)疝修补术中补片固定的纤维蛋白胶:适应证、技术及结果
Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1846-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0502-1.
7
Initial experience with the use of fibrin sealant for the fixation of the prosthetic mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中使用纤维蛋白胶固定人工补片的初步经验。
Rozhl Chir. 2005 Aug;84(8):399-402.
8
Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶与吻合钉用于补片固定的Meta分析和系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5039-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Review of 1000 fibrin glue mesh fixation during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.1000例内镜全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶网片固定的回顾
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4544-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4791-3. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study.腹腔镜经腹疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶与吻合钉用于补片固定的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):668-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9458-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a self-adherent mesh: a patient-reported follow-up study.使用自粘补片进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的复发及并发症:一项患者报告的随访研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2464-2470. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11614-7. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with self-fixated meshes: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜下使用自固定补片修补腹股沟疝:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2425-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11616-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Penetrating versus non-penetrating mesh fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair.
腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中穿透性与非穿透性补片固定
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD016122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016122.
4
Meta-analysis of RCTs on the safety of non-fixation of mesh in TAPP inguinal hernia repair: an updated meta-analysis.经 RCT 分析的 TAPP 腹股沟疝修补术中不固定补片的安全性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 17;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02628-4.
5
A retrospective study of 3D laparoscopy and 2D laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) for unilateral inguinal hernia in elderly patients.回顾性研究 3D 腹腔镜与 2D 腹腔镜在老年单侧腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)中的应用。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2593-2601. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01923-2. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Cyanoacrylate mesh fixation for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study.氰基丙烯酸酯网片固定用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9105-9115. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10439-6. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
No evidence for fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中无网片固定的证据:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8291-8300. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10237-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
8
Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.不同的腹股沟疝修补术后恢复期建议:系统范围综述。
Hernia. 2022 Aug;26(4):1009-1021. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
9
The comparison of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中自固定网片与传统网片的比较:荟萃分析结果。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):857-863. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01218-w. Epub 2022 Jan 16.
10
Prospective randomized study comparing single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at 2 years.前瞻性随机研究比较单切口腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术 2 年的疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3262-3272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6045-z. Epub 2018 Jan 23.