• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中,使用无创伤性纤维蛋白胶与钉合固定超轻钛化网比较的长期结果和慢性疼痛:单中心经验。

Long-term outcome and chronic pain in atraumatic fibrin glue versus staple fixation of extra light titanized meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Agatharied Hospital, Hausham, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1929-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06965-x. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-06965-x
PMID:31300910
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair belongs to the most frequently performed surgical procedures. Endoscopic techniques like TAPP and TEP have become standard of care together with the conventional open techniques. Especially in endoscopic techniques, there is a confusing amount of different meshes and fixation techniques with impact on perioperative and long-term outcome. We present the first single-center data on the use of titanized extra lightweight meshes and fibrin glue fixation compared to staple fixation regarding long-term outcome, especially chronic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A clinical trial with retrospective analysis of patient- and procedure-related data and questionnaire-based follow-up of TAPP procedures performed in 2012-2014 was conducted in a specialized hernia center. Standard TAPP technique was used with placement of TiMesh extra light (16 g/m) and either fibrin glue or staple fixation. Procedure- and patient-related data are compared after propensity score matching regarding perioperative complications and long-term outcome.

RESULTS

Of 612 TAPP procedures 372 procedures were included in analysis after propensity score matching. Fibrin glue was used in n = 279 and staple fixation in n = 93 cases. There were significant differences regarding duration of the surgical procedures (p = 0.001) and distribution of mesh size. No differences were noted regarding perioperative complications such as seroma or hematoma formation and need for re-laparoscopy. During a mean follow-up of 32.1 ± 20.6 month with a follow-up rate of 79%, there was no difference in long-term outcome, especially for rate of recurrence (p = 0.112) and development of chronic pain (p = 0.846). The overall rate of recurrence was 3.0% (n = 11), and in 2.4% (n = 9) patients complained of chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

Inguinal hernia repair using extra lightweight titanized meshes and fibrin glue fixation is safe and feasible compared to staple fixation even in large and combined hernia defects, if mesh size is adjusted to size of hernia defect. The rate of chronic pain was extremely low at 2.4%.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术属于最常施行的外科手术之一。与传统的开放式手术相比,TAPP 和 TEP 等内镜技术已成为标准治疗方法。特别是在内镜技术中,不同的网片和固定技术种类繁多,对围手术期和长期结果都有影响。我们报告了首例关于使用钛加固超轻量网片和纤维蛋白胶固定与使用钉枪固定相比,在长期结果,特别是慢性疼痛方面的单中心数据。

材料和方法

对 2012-2014 年在专门的疝中心进行的 TAPP 手术的患者和手术相关数据进行前瞻性分析,并进行问卷调查随访,开展了一项临床试验。采用标准的 TAPP 技术,使用 TiMesh 超轻量网片(16g/m),并采用纤维蛋白胶或钉枪固定。在倾向评分匹配后,比较手术和患者相关数据,以评估围手术期并发症和长期结果。

结果

在 612 例 TAPP 手术中,372 例手术在倾向评分匹配后纳入分析。在 n=279 例中使用纤维蛋白胶,在 n=93 例中使用钉枪固定。手术时间(p=0.001)和网片尺寸分布存在显著差异。围手术期并发症(如血清肿或血肿形成和需要再次腹腔镜检查)无差异。在平均 32.1±20.6 个月的随访期(随访率为 79%)内,长期结果无差异,尤其是复发率(p=0.112)和慢性疼痛的发展(p=0.846)无差异。总体复发率为 3.0%(n=11),2.4%(n=9)的患者抱怨慢性疼痛。

结论

与钉枪固定相比,使用超轻量钛加固网片和纤维蛋白胶固定进行腹股沟疝修补术是安全可行的,即使在大的和合并疝缺损中,如果网片尺寸调整到疝缺损的尺寸。慢性疼痛的发生率极低,为 2.4%。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome and chronic pain in atraumatic fibrin glue versus staple fixation of extra light titanized meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single-center experience.在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中,使用无创伤性纤维蛋白胶与钉合固定超轻钛化网比较的长期结果和慢性疼痛:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1929-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06965-x. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
2
Staple versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.缝线与纤维蛋白胶固定在腹腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1269-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2025-2. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
3
Fibrin glue versus staple mesh fixation in single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A propensity score-matched analysis.纤维蛋白胶与钉板网片固定在单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.029. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
Review of 1000 fibrin glue mesh fixation during endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.1000例内镜全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶网片固定的回顾
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4544-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4791-3. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks.网片固定方法与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛:纤维蛋白胶与钉枪的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4077-4084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5454-8. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶与吻合钉用于补片固定的Meta分析和系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5039-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs. staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study.在 TAPP 疝修补术中使用无创伤纤维蛋白密封胶与钉合网片固定对慢性疼痛和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):249-54. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1862-3. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
8
One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP).一项前瞻性、随机临床试验的一年结果比较了四种网片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中的应用。
Hernia. 2011 Oct;15(5):503-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0810-4. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
9
Biomechanical analyses of mesh fixation in TAPP and TEP hernia repair.TAPP和TEP疝修补术中补片固定的生物力学分析
Surg Endosc. 2008 Mar;22(3):731-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9476-5.
10
Fibrin glue versus stapler fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair: a single center 5-year experience and analysis of the results in the elderly.纤维蛋白胶与钉合器固定在腹腔镜经腹腹股沟疝修补术中的比较:单中心 5 年经验及老年患者结果分析。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S94-S98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.371. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Modern Perspectives on Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review on Surgical Techniques, Mesh Selection and Fixation Strategies.腹股沟疝修补术的现代观点:关于手术技术、补片选择和固定策略的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 9;14(14):4875. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144875.
2
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair: risk of operation for recurrence depends on choice of both mesh and fixation device. A study from the Danish Hernia Database.经腹腹膜前疝修补术:复发的手术风险取决于补片和固定装置的选择。来自丹麦疝数据库的一项研究。
Hernia. 2025 Jul 11;29(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03344-5.
3
Comparison of anatomical polyester mesh without fixation and conventional flat mesh with fixation in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Concepts of Inguinal Hernia Repair.腹股沟疝修补术的当前概念
Visc Med. 2018 Apr;34(2):145-150. doi: 10.1159/000487278. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures.经腹腹膜前补片修补术后血清肿:发生率、危险因素和预防措施。
解剖学聚酯无固定补片与传统固定平片在腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的比较
Hernia. 2025 Mar 29;29(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03231-5.
4
Non-fixation versus fixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中补片非固定与固定的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 6;19(12):e0314334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314334. eCollection 2024.
5
[Outpatient treatment for hernia surgery in Germany].[德国疝气手术的门诊治疗]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;95(12):956-961. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02164-0. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
6
Comparison of modified tumescent and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective clinical study.改良肿胀技术与传统腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220789. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220789.
7
Impact of titanium-coated polypropylene mesh on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair.钛涂层聚丙烯补片对腹股沟疝修补术后功能结局和生活质量的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 29;9(7):e17691. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17691. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair: Should it be the preferred technique?腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补术:它应该成为首选技术吗?
World J Methodol. 2022 Jul 20;12(4):193-199. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.193.
9
Evaluation of long-term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.单侧与双侧环形切口经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的长期慢性疼痛及预后评估
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Feb 16;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12556. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Bio-based and bio-inspired adhesives from animals and plants for biomedical applications.用于生物医学应用的来自动植物的生物基和仿生粘合剂。
Mater Today Bio. 2022 Jan 12;13:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100203. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2222-2231. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5912-3. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
What are the influencing factors for chronic pain following TAPP inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of 20,004 patients from the Herniamed Registry.TAPP 腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的影响因素分析:来自 Herniamed 登记处的 20004 例患者分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1971-1983. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5893-2. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Lichtenstein Versus Total Extraperitoneal Patch Plasty Versus Transabdominal Patch Plasty Technique for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Registry-based, Propensity Score-matched Comparison of 57,906 Patients.经腹补片修补术与全腹膜外补片修补术与经腹腹膜外补片修补术治疗原发性单侧腹股沟疝的疗效比较:基于登记的、倾向评分匹配的 57906 例患者比较。
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):351-357. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002541.
6
[Inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique in a day-case surgery setting - at what price?].[日间手术模式下经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝——代价几何?]
Chirurg. 2017 Sep;88(9):792-798. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0429-9.
7
Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks.网片固定方法与经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛:纤维蛋白胶与钉枪的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4077-4084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5454-8. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中纤维蛋白胶与吻合钉用于补片固定的Meta分析和系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5039-y. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?外科医生的手术量对内窥镜腹股沟疝修补术的结果有影响吗?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):573-585. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5001-z. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Potential Pitfalls of Reporting and Bias in Observational Studies With Propensity Score Analysis Assessing a Surgical Procedure: A Methodological Systematic Review.采用倾向评分分析评估外科手术的观察性研究中的报告潜在缺陷与偏倚:一项方法学系统评价
Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):901-909. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001797.